Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

5/5/2010
05:24 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Product Watch: FireEye Unveils Signature-Less Anti-Malware Appliances

"Modern malware" detection and prevention behind the firewall

FireEye now offers an inline appliance version of its Malware Protection System: the new appliances sit behind the firewall and detect attacks without the use of antivirus signatures.

The new appliances, which are based on the company's existing Malware Protection System products, basically catch the unknown threats that firewalls and intrusion prevention systems (IPSes) don't, says Marc Maiffrett, chief security architect for FireEye. "When we light up is when [unknown threats] are slipping through, or if there's already stuff on your network," he says.

FireEye's technology uses virtual machine analysis and FireEye's cloud-based intelligence network -- but no malware signatures. "In a full malware lifecycle, there are still inbound exploits coming through the network from WiFi or USBs … existing compromised machines, so we look at the outbound traffic coming out of the network [as well]," Maiffrett says.

Maiffrett says FireEye got to see its technology's response during Operation Aurora, when some of its customers were among those targeted in the attacks on Google, Adobe, Intel, and others. "We got to see firsthand how it would play out. Three of our customers ... were using our [original] detection product," he says, which helped analyze the malware used in the attacks.

With the new inline appliance, a zero-day like Aurora would go to the VM analysis engine first: "As soon as we could see it was bad ... we put in a rule that blocks it from calling back to the server in Taiwan," for example, Maiffrett says. "So any computers that might have been targeted would not be able to communicate out."

FireEye today also launched Modern Malware Exposed, a site that includes educational content and tools for businesses and provides a free malware assessment.

Pricing for the FireEye 2000, 4000, and 7000 series network security appliances starts at $24,950.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19012
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
An integer overflow in the search_in_range function in regexec.c in Oniguruma 6.x before 6.9.4_rc2 leads to an out-of-bounds read, in which the offset of this read is under the control of an attacker. (This only affects the 32-bit compiled version). Remote attackers can cause a denial-of-service or ...
CVE-2019-19022
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
iTerm2 through 3.3.6 has potentially insufficient documentation about the presence of search history in com.googlecode.iterm2.plist, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, as demonstrated by searching for the NoSyncSearchHistory string in .plist files within public Git r...
CVE-2019-19035
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
jhead 3.03 is affected by: heap-based buffer over-read. The impact is: Denial of service. The component is: ReadJpegSections and process_SOFn in jpgfile.c. The attack vector is: Open a specially crafted JPEG file.
CVE-2019-19011
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
MiniUPnP ngiflib 0.4 has a NULL pointer dereference in GifIndexToTrueColor in ngiflib.c via a file that lacks a palette.
CVE-2019-19010
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-16
Eval injection in the Math plugin of Limnoria (before 2019.11.09) and Supybot (through 2018-05-09) allows remote unprivileged attackers to disclose information or possibly have unspecified other impact via the calc and icalc IRC commands.