Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

7/2/2010
12:41 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Popular Windows Apps Reject Microsoft Security Features

Some third-party applications aren't using Microsoft's Windows DEP, ASLR security

Turns out Microsoft's much-lauded Data Execution Protection (DEP) and Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) security features for Windows aren't necessarily being deployed in widespread third-party Windows applications.

Secunia sampled 16 of the most popular third-party Windows apps to study how or if they supported Microsoft's and ASLR, and found that half of these apps don't use them at all.

The apps analyzed were Adobe Flash Player, Sun Java JRE, Adobe Reader, Mozilla Firefox, Apple QuickTime Player, VLC Media Player, Apple iTunes, Google Chrome, Adobe Shockwave Player, OpenOffice.org, Google Picasa, Foxit Reader, Opera, Winamp, RealPlayer, and Apple Safari. Among those, QuickTime, Foxit Reader, Picasa, Java, OpenOffice.org, RealPlayer, VideoLAN VLC Player, and Winamp do not use Microsoft's DEP and ASLR.

DEP helps quell code execution in nonexecutable memory and was one of the key defenses against the original Operation Aurora exploit code. ASLR basically protects the system from an exploit attempting to call a system function by placing code in random areas of memory and making it more difficult for an attacker to run malware on a machine.

Thomas Kristensen, CSO at Secunia, says he was surprised that these key Windows apps weren't taking advantage of the Microsoft security features. "That such popular, high-profile products -- some of which has been active exploited recently -- aren't doing more to secure their users" was surprising, he says. "Using DEP/ASLR is a cheap and easy way to make exploitation significantly more difficult."

And all of these apps also have recently discovered memory-corruption vulnerabilities that allow for code execution, he says.

Meanwhile, several of these vendors plan to implement DEP and ASLR, but in the interim their apps remain more exposed. "It is much easier to exploit vulnerabilities in a reliable and consistent manner" without DEP and ASLR, Kristensen says.

A copy of Secunia's full report can be downloaded here (PDF). Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
Inside the Ransomware Campaigns Targeting Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/2/2021
Commentary
Beyond MITRE ATT&CK: The Case for a New Cyber Kill Chain
Rik Turner, Principal Analyst, Infrastructure Solutions, Omdia,  3/30/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-27486
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
The Fatek Automation WinProladder Versions 3.3 and prior are vulnerable to an integer underflow, which may cause an out-of-bounds write and allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2021-3465
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-15942
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
An information disclosure vulnerability in Web Vulnerability Scan profile of Fortinet's FortiWeb version 6.2.x below 6.2.4 and version 6.3.x below 6.3.5 may allow a remote authenticated attacker to read the password used by the FortiWeb scanner to access the device defined in the scan profile.
CVE-2021-22190
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
A path traversal vulnerability via the GitLab Workhorse in all versions of GitLab could result in the leakage of a JWT token
CVE-2021-24024
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
A clear text storage of sensitive information into log file vulnerability in FortiADCManager 5.3.0 and below, 5.2.1 and below and FortiADC 5.3.7 and below may allow a remote authenticated attacker to read other local users' password in log files.