Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

7/2/2010
12:41 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Popular Windows Apps Reject Microsoft Security Features

Some third-party applications aren't using Microsoft's Windows DEP, ASLR security

Turns out Microsoft's much-lauded Data Execution Protection (DEP) and Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) security features for Windows aren't necessarily being deployed in widespread third-party Windows applications.

Secunia sampled 16 of the most popular third-party Windows apps to study how or if they supported Microsoft's and ASLR, and found that half of these apps don't use them at all.

The apps analyzed were Adobe Flash Player, Sun Java JRE, Adobe Reader, Mozilla Firefox, Apple QuickTime Player, VLC Media Player, Apple iTunes, Google Chrome, Adobe Shockwave Player, OpenOffice.org, Google Picasa, Foxit Reader, Opera, Winamp, RealPlayer, and Apple Safari. Among those, QuickTime, Foxit Reader, Picasa, Java, OpenOffice.org, RealPlayer, VideoLAN VLC Player, and Winamp do not use Microsoft's DEP and ASLR.

DEP helps quell code execution in nonexecutable memory and was one of the key defenses against the original Operation Aurora exploit code. ASLR basically protects the system from an exploit attempting to call a system function by placing code in random areas of memory and making it more difficult for an attacker to run malware on a machine.

Thomas Kristensen, CSO at Secunia, says he was surprised that these key Windows apps weren't taking advantage of the Microsoft security features. "That such popular, high-profile products -- some of which has been active exploited recently -- aren't doing more to secure their users" was surprising, he says. "Using DEP/ASLR is a cheap and easy way to make exploitation significantly more difficult."

And all of these apps also have recently discovered memory-corruption vulnerabilities that allow for code execution, he says.

Meanwhile, several of these vendors plan to implement DEP and ASLR, but in the interim their apps remain more exposed. "It is much easier to exploit vulnerabilities in a reliable and consistent manner" without DEP and ASLR, Kristensen says.

A copy of Secunia's full report can be downloaded here (PDF). Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
News
Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
Commentary
Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-32089
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** An issue was discovered on Zebra (formerly Motorola Solutions) Fixed RFID Reader FX9500 devices. An unauthenticated attacker can upload arbitrary files to the filesystem that can then be accessed through the web interface. This can lead to information disclosure and c...
CVE-2020-24586
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that received fragments be cleared from memory after (re)connecting to a network. Under the right circumstances, when another device sends fragmented frames encrypted us...
CVE-2020-24587
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that all fragments of a frame are encrypted under the same key. An adversary can abuse this to decrypt selected fragments when another device sends fragmented frames and...
CVE-2020-24588
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that the A-MSDU flag in the plaintext QoS header field is authenticated. Against devices that support receiving non-SSP A-MSDU frames (which is mandatory as part of 802....
CVE-2020-26139
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
An issue was discovered in the kernel in NetBSD 7.1. An Access Point (AP) forwards EAPOL frames to other clients even though the sender has not yet successfully authenticated to the AP. This might be abused in projected Wi-Fi networks to launch denial-of-service attacks against connected clients and...