Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

5/4/2016
08:30 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Millions Of Web Servers Vulnerable To ImageMagick Attack

US-CERT issues advisory on 0-day flaws found in popular image processing tool.

LAS VEGAS – Interop 2016 -- A popular open-source image processing tool used in content management systems, social media, and other Web servers contains newly discovered vulnerabilities that could allow an attacker to wrest control of those systems.

Researchers yesterday disclosed details of the flaws found in the ImageMagick library of tools --before fully functioning patches were available because there were already exploits circulating.  Meantime, Metasploit modules have been created and are in the public review process.

US-CERT today issued an advisory about the vulnerabilities, and noted that the developers of ImageMagick have released updates to their software, versions 7.0.1-1 and 6.9.3-10. But the research firm that found and studied the flaws says the patches are "incomplete."

Moore and other security experts say the vulnerabilities are noteworthy and potentially serious, but the good news is that there are some configurations that won’t necessarily be at risk. And the image attacks are nowhere near as easy to pull off as many other Web exploits.

“Right now there’s lower-hanging fruit. You don’t need to burn an 0-day,” says Cameron Camp, security researcher at ESET, who will give a presentation on malware here this week. An attacker more easily could scan for other simpler vulnerabilities or exploit an open port, Camp says.

Some Web platforms have filters that content must pass before being sent to the ImageMagick library, so the attack isn’t necessarily lethal for all sites. “The systems most at risk are Web applications that allow users to upload media. This applies to forums, content management systems, image boards, and various social media networks,” Moore says. “Many blogging and hosting platforms also support ImageMagick as a plugin, but most of those require a valid user account before you can upload media.”

ImageMagick is a tool for resizing images uploaded to Web servers. “A PHP function calls ImageMagick to resize photos. If you can impersonate ImageMagick, you have a privileged user situation,” Camp says.

Mail.Ru’s Nikolay Ermishkin is credited with discovering several flaws in ImageMagick, including the CVE-2016-3716 vulnerability that could let an attacker remotely run code on a victim server. The flaw lies in insufficient filtering for a filename such that an attacker could slip malicious code into the file conversion process. 

A second flaw, CVE-2016-3716, described as a “file moving” bug, allows an attacker to move an image file to another file extension in any folder using ImageMagick’s “msl” protocol. “In real life it may be web services written in PHP, which allows to upload raw txt files and process images with ImageMagick,” Mail.Ru wrote in a post today. 

There are a total of five vulnerabilities, which have been dubbed "ImageTragick."

“The less-likely but more dangerous scenarios are systems that automatically process media stored by untrusted users. For example, a photo gallery service that uses ImageMagick to generate thumbnails from user uploads,” Moore says.

Meanwhile, experts recommend verifying all image files before sending them to ImageMagick for formatting, and using a policy file to disable the vulnerable ImageMagick coders. 

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "The truth behind Stonehenge...."
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-27886
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
rakibtg Docker Dashboard before 2021-02-28 allows command injection in backend/utilities/terminal.js via shell metacharacters in the command parameter of an API request. NOTE: this is NOT a Docker, Inc. product.
CVE-2016-8153
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8154
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8155
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8156
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.