Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

1/21/2020
05:00 PM
50%
50%

Microsoft, DHS Warn of Zero-Day Attack Targeting IE Users

Software firm is "aware of limited targeted attacks" exploiting a scripting issue vulnerability in Internet Explorer 9, 10, and 11 that previously has not been disclosed.

A targeted attack is targeting a previously unknown vulnerability in Internet Explorer to corrupt memory and exploit victims' Windows systems, Microsoft warned in an advisory published on January 17.

The flaw, described as a scripting engine memory corruption vulnerability and designated CVE-2020-0674, allows an attacker to take control of a Windows system by forcing it to use an older version of Microsoft's JavaScript that is only present for backward compatibility. By default, Internet Explorer does not use the vulnerable dynamic library, Microsoft stated.

"The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user," Microsoft stated in Advisory 200001. "An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system."

While the attack is serious, its impact is limited because Internet Explorer is only used by a limited number of users who want backward compatibility with older Microsoft technologies. Currently, only 2.3% of visitors use Internet Explorer 11, one of the vulnerable versions, according to W3counter.

The vulnerable library, <code>jscript.dll</code> is typically not used, so an attacker needs to control the website or have created a web page that is opened in a vulnerable browser.

"By convincing a user to view a specially crafted HTML document — [that is,] a web page [or] an email attachment — PDF file, Microsoft Office document, or any other document that supports embedded Internet Explorer scripting engine content, an attacker may be able to execute arbitrary code," Carnegie Mellon University's CERT Coordination Center stated in an advisory.

Companies that rely on Internet Explorer — a much smaller portion than a decade ago — should apply Microsoft's recommended workaround as soon as possible, says Casey Ellis, founder and chief technology officer of Bugcrowd.

"In the absence of a patch, having a workaround is crucial, and it's great that Microsoft provided alternatives to mitigate the risk to users," he says. "Since Google's Threat Analysis Group reported the vulnerability, it's unlikely that Chrome is affected by a similar bug and is safe to use."

The advice to use another browser is a more viable protection, mostly since other browsers are now much more popular than Microsoft Edge. Currently, only about 8% of web visitors use either Internet Explorer or, more likely, Microsoft Edge, according to W3Counter.

This is not the first time that Microsoft has had to scramble to contain attacks targeted its older scripting engines. If it seems like deja vu, it's because Microsoft patched a similar flaw in November. The issue, CVE-2019-1429, allowed attackers to corrupt the scripting engine's memory using a specially crafted website or an ActiveX control.

A year before that, another vulnerability, CVE-2018-8653, affected the scripting engine of Internet Explorer, allowing attackers to execute Visual Basic scripts or Microsoft's version of JavaScript.

Although Microsoft adopted a bug bounty to head off flaws, nation-state and criminal hackers continue to find ways to compromise systems, raising the question: If Microsoft's bug bounty did not convince the attacker to sell the vulnerability information to the software maker, are bug bounties effective?

Bugcrowd's Ellis defends the bounties because they raise the price of exploits and give ethical researchers another reason to disclose issues.

"This does not undermine bug bounties or crowdsourced security," he says. "The reality is that since the exploit has been used in limited targeted attacks, it is likely an offensive buyer paid more for it than Microsoft was offering or it was developed in-house for offensive use."

Ellis notes that Microsoft credited two organizations for finding the latest issue.

Related Content

Check out The Edge, Dark Reading's new section for features, threat data, and in-depth perspectives. Today's top story: "With International Tensions Flaring, Cyber-Risk Is Heating Up for All Businesses."

Veteran technology journalist of more than 20 years. Former research engineer. Written for more than two dozen publications, including CNET News.com, Dark Reading, MIT's Technology Review, Popular Science, and Wired News. Five awards for journalism, including Best Deadline ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Stop Defending Everything
Kevin Kurzawa, Senior Information Security Auditor,  2/12/2020
Small Business Security: 5 Tips on How and Where to Start
Mike Puglia, Chief Strategy Officer at Kaseya,  2/13/2020
Architectural Analysis IDs 78 Specific Risks in Machine-Learning Systems
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  2/13/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-2228
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-19
The XStream extension in HP Fortify SCA before 2.2 RC3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unsafe deserialization of XML messages.
CVE-2014-2727
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-19
The STARTTLS implementation in MailMarshal before 7.2 allows plaintext command injection.
CVE-2015-2104
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-19
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2014-3622
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-19
Use-after-free vulnerability in the add_post_var function in the Posthandler component in PHP 5.6.x before 5.6.1 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging a third-party filter extension that accesses a certain ksep value.
CVE-2016-10000
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-19
Insufficient type checks were employed prior to casting input data in SimpleXMLElement_exportNode and simplexml_import_dom. This issue affects HHVM versions prior to 3.9.5, all versions between 3.10.0 and 3.12.3 (inclusive), and all versions between 3.13.0 and 3.14.1 (inclusive).