Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

11/5/2009
01:36 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Little-Known Hole Lets Attacker Hit Main Website Domain Via Its Subdomains

Proof-of-concept demonstrates how exploits on Google, Expedia, Chase Manhattan subdomains could lead to compromises of their main sites

Turns out an exploit on a Website's subdomain can be used to attack the main domain: A researcher has released a proof-of-concept showing how cookies can be abused to execute such an insidious attack.

Michael Bailey, senior researcher for Foreground Security, published a paper this week that demonstrates how an exploit in a subdomain, such as mail.google.com, could be used to hack the main production domain, google.com, all because of the way browsers handle cookies.

"There's no specific vulnerability here, but it's widening the attack surface for any large organization that has more than one [Web] server set up. A [vulnerability] in any one of those servers can affect all the rest," Bailey says.

Most Web developers aren't aware that a vulnerability in a subdomain could be used to target the main domain. "We're trying to get the message out that now you have to treat everything [in the domain] as though someone can compromise your crown jewels," says Michael Murray, CSO for Foreground. "You have to realize that every vulnerability, every attack vector in those subdomains, can be used to compromise [other areas of the domain]," he says.

It all boils down to the browsers themselves. Within the DNS architecture, the main domain -- fortune500company.com, for instance -- has control over its subdomains, such as development.fortune500company.com. Development.fortune500company.com has no authority to change anything on the main fortune500company.com site.

But browsers do the reverse, Murray says. Development.fortune500company.com can set cookies for fortune500company.com, the main domain. That leaves the door open for cookie-tampering, he says, when the subdomain has an exploitable vulnerability, such as cross-site scripting (XSS) or cross-site request forgery (CSRF).

"Most developers don't care if there's an XSS bug in the development site. But now all of those vulnerabilities are as important as an XSS in the main site," Murray says.

There's no actual patch to protect against the attack -- it's more about how Web developers set up their site domains. And when the site uses third-party content, it's even more at risk, according to the researchers.

In his paper (PDF), Foreground's Bailey showed PoCs with Google, Expedia, and Chase Manhattan's Websites. "The Chase online banking app could be compromised from one of the marketing companies they partnered with," Bailey says. His example in the PoC showed how images.chase.com, images.capitalone.com, and online.chasevisasignature.com all point to content from images.bigfootinteractive.com, an advertising agency's server. That server is actually vulnerable to XSS, he found, so it can be used to compromise a legitimate Chase user's banking session.

The answer, he says, is to use a completely different subdomain from your main one when pointing to content from a third party.

Bailey says so far he hasn't seen any actual attacks exploiting this. "But I have seen mentions of similar research on black hat forums. I know this isn't completely new to black hats," he says. He recommends users clean up their cookies regularly and use separate Web browsers or browser sessions for sensitive browsing activities.

Meanwhile, any flaw on a subdomain is putting all users on the main domain at risk. "They've got to treat a development site the same as the online banking site," Foreground's Murray says. "The implications are huge here."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Data Leak Week: Billions of Sensitive Files Exposed Online
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/10/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Our Endpoint Protection system is a little outdated... 
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19782
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
The FTP client in AceaXe Plus 1.0 allows a buffer overflow via a long EHLO response from an FTP server.
CVE-2019-19777
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
stb_image.h (aka the stb image loader) 2.23, as used in libsixel and other products, has a heap-based buffer over-read in stbi__load_main.
CVE-2019-19778
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
An issue was discovered in libsixel 1.8.2. There is a heap-based buffer over-read in the function load_sixel at loader.c.
CVE-2019-16777
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Versions of the npm CLI prior to 6.13.4 are vulnerable to an Arbitrary File Overwrite. It fails to prevent existing globally-installed binaries to be overwritten by other package installations. For example, if a package was installed globally and created a serve binary, any subsequent installs of pa...
CVE-2019-16775
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Versions of the npm CLI prior to 6.13.3 are vulnerable to an Arbitrary File Write. It is possible for packages to create symlinks to files outside of thenode_modules folder through the bin field upon installation. A properly constructed entry in the package.json bin field would allow a package publi...