Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

12:00 AM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases

Lastline Knowledge Base of Malware Intelligence with String Indexing Launches at RSA

Vast, Structured Repository Offers an Average of 10 Times More Data per Malware Query than Other Threat Intelligence Stores

Tuesday, April 21, 2015 — San Francisco, Calif. — The Lastline Knowledge Base (LLKB) launched today at the RSA Conference. The new software module can be combined with the Lastline Breach Detection Platform to give security professionals critical context around incidents to proactively respond to and defend against active breaches. The vast, structured data repository contains years of comprehensive malware data that is updated continuously as new threats and relationships between them emerge.

The LLKB lets security professionals quickly dig deep into historical breaches, related IP addresses and the indicators of compromise (IOCs) for malware tied to an advanced threat. Incident Response (IR) and Security Operations Center (SOC) teams can then use the LLKB to identify specific attributions related to previously unseen malware attacking their network to drastically improve escalation accuracy, rapid containment, effective countermeasures and future protections.

“In enterprise security, knowledge is the lifeblood of defense,” said Brian Laing, vice president of products for Lastline. “Drawing on decades of research, we’ve built a continuously updated, fully integrated and searchable database of threat intelligence within the Lastline Breach Detection Platform. The Lastline Knowledge Base puts instant malware knowledge specific to each customer organization into the hands of security professionals who can use it to simultaneously defend against current threats while preventing future breaches.”

Upwards of 10x the Data on Each Malware Query vs. Standard Threat Intelligence

Combining IOC and activity information for each sample, the LLKB delivers at least 10 times the data on each malware sample as compared to typical threat intelligence stores. When triaging a detected threat, SOC members can use the LLKB to assess the prevalence and historical impact of related malware samples within their network or industry vertical. Escalation and remediation decisions are reached more quickly, and are better informed. In parallel, they can block all related domains or IP addresses -- particularly useful if there are indications of a targeted attack. With the LLKB, you can also search for URLs in the memory image of every known malware sample, potentially identifying malware targeting your organization before it even reaches your network. This unprecedented level of detail is made possible by full system emulation (FUSE). FUSE is the only approach to sandboxing that provides visibility into every single instruction that a malware sample executes, together with a complete view of its memory during runtime. With this unique level of visibility, the LLKB is enriched with information that no other threat intelligence source can provide.

LLKB Indexes Malware Memory Strings, IOCs, IP Addresses, Domains and More

The LLKB allows an operator to query for malware data well-beyond IP addresses and domains. Uniquely, the LLKB indexes the strings in the memory of the malware. For example, queries can be performed against strings that have been observed in memory snapshots taken during malware executions. This run-time information can be key in determining if a malware sample is targeted to specific environments or enterprise accounts.

The LLKB helps incident responders get a full picture of the evolving threat landscape in the context of their organization. For example, they can query the LLKB using information about a new variant of Dyre to identify other related IP addresses or domains associated with similar malware. They can then proactively change rules in their existing in-line intrusion prevention system (IPS) or next-generation firewall (NGFW) security systems to ensure the right defensive countermeasures are in place. IR team members can also use the LLKB to get detailed context on malware like Carbanak to pinpoint traces of related malware within their own network using the Lastline Breach Detection Platform. The LLKB also integrates with third party tools through the Lastline Defense Program for enhanced threat intelligence sharing.

The Lastline Breach Detection Platform is based on over a decade of research and helps protect Global 2000 organizations from advanced and evasive malware. The software-based anti-malware platform also powers products and services offered by leading security providers including Barracuda, Dell SecureWorks and WatchGuard Technologies.

To learn more about Lastline, please visit: www.lastline.com.

About Lastline

Lastline is innovating the way companies detect active breaches caused by advanced persistent threats, targeted attacks and evasive malware with its software-based Breach Detection Platform. Lastline’s open architecture integrates advanced threat defenses and intelligence into existing operational workflows and security systems. Inspection of suspicious objects occurs at scale in real-time using a full-system emulation approach to sandboxing that is superior to virtual machine-based and OS emulation techniques. Lastline's technology correlates network and object analysis to achieve timely breach confirmation and incident response. Lastline was built by Anubis and Wepawet researchers and industry veterans with decades of experience focused specifically on advanced breach weaponry and tactics.

Headquartered in Redwood City, California with offices throughout North America, Europe and Asia, Lastline’s platform is used by global managed security service providers, Global 2000 enterprises and leading security vendors worldwide. To learn more, visit www.lastline.com.


Jeannie Hornung
[email protected]


Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
SerComm AG Combo VD625 AGSOT_2.1.0 devices allow CRLF injection (for HTTP header injection) in the download function via the Content-Disposition header.
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
An issue was discovered in through SaltStack Salt before 3002.5. salt.modules.cmdmod can log credentials to the info or error log level.
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
In SaltStack Salt before 3002.5, eauth tokens can be used once after expiration. (They might be used to run command against the salt master or minions.)
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
An issue was discovered in SaltStack Salt before 3002.5. Sending crafted web requests to the Salt API can result in salt.utils.thin.gen_thin() command injection because of different handling of single versus double quotes. This is related to salt/utils/thin.py.
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
i-doit before 1.16.0 is affected by Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) issues that could allow remote authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via C__MONITORING__CONFIG__TITLE, SM2__C__MONITORING__CONFIG__TITLE, C__MONITORING__CONFIG__PATH, SM2__C__MONITORING__CONFIG__PATH, C__M...