Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

2/1/2019
10:30 AM
Joshua Goldfarb
Joshua Goldfarb
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail vvv
0%
100%

KISS, Cyber & the Humble but Nourishing Chickpea

The combination of simple, straightforward, and methodical ingredients are the keys to developing a balanced and well-rounded security program.

In recent years, hummus has become a trendy food. Once considered a mere dip-like side dish in many western countries, hummus has recently found a seat at the table as a serious and tasty main course option. It raises the question: What is it about hummus that has made it a star?

In my opinion, what sets hummus apart from other foods is its uncanny ability to be both simple and fulfilling at the same time. Hummus is humble, yet nourishing. It is plain, yet flavorful. It is inexpensive, yet filling.

To fully understand the magic of hummus, we need to break it down to its essence. While there are many different hummus recipes and varieties, the core ingredient of hummus is chickpeas — plain old garbanzo beans. Chickpeas have no need to get fancy or showy; they simply get the job done, time after time, with minimal cost and waste.

So, what does my obsession with hummus have to do with information security? More than you might initially be inclined to believe. Allow me to explain:

1. KISS: The KISS principle (Keep it simple, stupid!) states that most systems work best if they are kept simple rather than complicated. More often than not, there is a simple, straightforward way to solve a problem. If you design a solution that is cumbersome and overcomplicated, chances are you don't understand the problem well enough to solve it elegantly. There is almost never a need to get fancy. That merely creates an opportunity to introduce error unnecessarily.

2. Slow and steady wins the race: It may be tempting to chase after the item "du jour," or the latest fad in security, but during the course of my career, I've watched the quick rise and hurried fall of one trendy topic after another. At the end of the day, security teams need to remain focused on improving security posture and reducing risk. That involves applying people, process, and technology strategically over the long term and solving in a repeatable manner over time. Getting distracted by bright, shiny objects doesn't help in the least.

3. Minimize cost: It's always fascinated me how the default response to solving a problem almost always seems to be to throw more money at it. Obviously, proper funding is required to ensure that a security organization can accomplish its goals and that security challenges get addressed at scale. But what about when funding isn't the problem? Or, to ask the question differently, what about situations where problems can be solved by leveraging or optimizing existing investments? Looking to be frugal and resourceful, when appropriate, can be surprisingly effective. It's not always necessary to make large investments to get the job done. In fact, doing so can sometimes have exactly the opposite effect. How so? In the near term, it can divert resources and attention away from important work. In the longer term, it can introduce additional levels of complexity that will draw scarce resources away from other tasks.

4. Minimize waste: I've lost count of the number of times in my career that I've seen complex, expensive systems procured, deployed, operated, maintained, replaced, and then decommissioned. The cost of running through this process can grow quite large. Granted, risk changes, technology matures, and priorities adapt over time. But even taking all this into account, some technologies are discarded simply because they were procured three or four years ago. Does the age of a solution affect whether or not it can address a modern challenge? In some cases, perhaps. But instead of considering a technology's age, what if we considered its relevance to the goals and priorities we are looking to address? From this perspective, you might want to hold on to some of what you have before giving it the boot.

5. Cover the essential nutrients: A security program has many different limbs to feed, nurture, and sustain. It's important to take care of and provide for all of these essential elements in accordance with their needs. Focusing too much on one particular aspect of security comes at the expense of the others. A simple, straightforward, and methodical way to nourish all parts of the security program produces a far more balanced and well-rounded approach. There is nothing to be gained by focusing on a small number of elements, and in fact, there is quite a bit to be lost. When important security functions are neglected, the organization's security posture suffers.

Related Content:

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop agenda here.

Josh (Twitter: @ananalytical) is an experienced information security leader who works with enterprises to mature and improve their enterprise security programs.  Previously, Josh served as VP, CTO - Emerging Technologies at FireEye and as Chief Security Officer for ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
97% of Americans Can't Ace a Basic Security Test
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  5/20/2019
How Security Vendors Can Address the Cybersecurity Talent Shortage
Rob Rashotte, VP of Global Training and Technical Field Enablement at Fortinet,  5/24/2019
TeamViewer Admits Breach from 2016
Dark Reading Staff 5/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-7068
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7069
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7070
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7071
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure.
CVE-2019-7072
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .