Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

8/2/2016
09:00 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Kaspersky Lab Kicks Off Its First Bug Bounty Program

Security vendor teams up with HackerOne to pay out $50K to researchers over next six months.

Security software is no stranger to security flaws and a major anti-virus company today launched a bug bounty program that opens up its products to outside scrutiny by researchers.

Kaspersky Lab has teamed up with bug bounty platform vendor HackerOne to o /admin/.http:/googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2015/09/kaspersky-mo-unpackers-mo-problems.ht ffer $50,000 in rewards to white-hat hackers who find vulnerabilities in its Kaspersky Internet Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Security products. The bug bounty program, which begins today and runs for six months, could be expanded into a long-term program covering additional Kaspersky software products, the company says.

Security vendors such as Symantec, McAfee, Kaspersky, and Trend Micro, all have been the subject of vulnerability discoveries in their software. Most recently, Kaspersky last fall patched multiple flaws exposed by Google’s Tavis Ormand, who at the time pointed out how antivirus exploits are a hot commodity in the black market. “We have strong evidence that an active black market trade in antivirus exploits exists. Research shows that it’s an easily accessible attack surface that dramatically increases exposure to targeted attacks,” Ormandy said in a Sept. blog post, where he also gave Kaspersky Lab kudos for their rapid fixes. “For this reason, the vendors of security products have a responsibility to uphold the highest secure development standards possible to minimise the potential for harm caused by their software.”

Kaspersky’s new bug bounty program follows an internal “ad hoc” type approach the security firm used for rewarding researchers who found flaws in its software, says Ryan Naraine, head of Kaspersky Lab’s global research & analysis team in the US. “We already had an internal system for dealing with” vulnerability reporting, Naraine says. "But we never had a process that actively encourages researchers to come with us with bugs."

Naraine says he hopes more security vendors will also launch bug bounty programs. “Security vendors as a whole have a higher level of responsibility” here, he says. “In one year, my hope is that a bug bounty launch will not be a news story” anymore, he says.

Software security experts say bug bounty programs are a key element of checking code with a fresh set of eyes outside the organization; HackerOne recently worked with the Defense Department on its pilot bug bounty program—the very first for the US federal government.

“Kaspersky has a long history of collaborating with the research community and with their public bug bounty program we anticipate they will be able to find and resolve even more vulnerabilities with the help of external hackers," says Alex Rice, CTO and co-founder of HackerOne.

 

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
dwilds
50%
50%
dwilds,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/10/2016 | 5:58:04 AM
Kaspersky
Kaspersky Lab is an international software security group operating in almost 200 countries and territories worldwide.
alphaa10
100%
0%
alphaa10,
User Rank: Strategist
8/4/2016 | 5:24:49 AM
Let the Bidding Wars Begin
Everyone who finds a prospective bug has value to offer a software publisher. The exercise of "choosing the best tip" is only a token nod to the importance of information harvested.

That renders bug bounties cost-effective more often than not for the sheer volume of information and perspective bug finders offer. 

The problem emerges when a bug finder wants to be paid more for the discovery, or something comparable to what he imagines he can get from criminal operations.

 
Commentary
What the FedEx Logo Taught Me About Cybersecurity
Matt Shea, Head of Federal @ MixMode,  6/4/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
A View From Inside a Deception
Sara Peters, Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/2/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-31811
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
In Apache PDFBox, a carefully crafted PDF file can trigger an OutOfMemory-Exception while loading the file. This issue affects Apache PDFBox version 2.0.23 and prior 2.0.x versions.
CVE-2021-31812
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
In Apache PDFBox, a carefully crafted PDF file can trigger an infinite loop while loading the file. This issue affects Apache PDFBox version 2.0.23 and prior 2.0.x versions.
CVE-2021-32552
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. When this function is used by the openjdk-16 package apport hooks, it could expose private data to other local users.
CVE-2021-32553
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. When this function is used by the openjdk-17 package apport hooks, it could expose private data to other local users.
CVE-2021-32554
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. When this function is used by the xorg package apport hooks, it could expose private data to other local users.