Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

How 'Postcript' Exploits Networked Printers

At Black Hat 2017, a university researcher will demo how attackers can drill into networked printers by way of the ubiquitous PostScript programming language.

Network printer exploits are like old dogs learning new tricks, according to a security researcher with Ruhr University.

In his upcoming Black Hat presentation, Exploiting Network Printers, Jens Muller, Ruhr University chair for network and data security will delve into an analysis of printer attacks, in which he discovered 20 printer models were all vulnerable to at least one of the same attacks that he tested. Muller will also disclose unusual ways the Internet is enabling network printer attacks via advanced cross-site printing techniques.

The vulnerability, Muller says, stems from the 35-year-old PostScript programming language, which has connected printers to end-users for decades, even as technology evolved from the parallel printer cable, to the USB stick, to networked printers, and today to the cloud.

"Before, printers used parallel cables and having PostScript wasn't a problem." Muller says. "But now, the printer manufacturers are still using PostScript and they can easily be exploited remotely."

PostScript: An Industry Standard 

The PostScript programming language is an industry standard for network printers and its use is ubiquitous. But despite attackers ability to exploit this language, printer manufacturers have largely looked the other way, he says. Instead, manufacturers put the onus on network administrators to place the printers inside the network, where the devices are presumed to be protected from outside threats.

Even today, he notes, manufacturers do not seem to realize that attackers can drill into networked printers by way of the Internet.

On the networking side, network administrators tend to view their connected printers as nothing more than a printing device, as opposed to a potential vector of attack, he says, noting that the end result is that network admins may not think it's important to secure network printers.

Some of the attacks Muller has tested include a denial of service attack that damaged eight of the 20 printers he was testing. One new issue to emerge is the ability to set a printer back to its factory defaults by taking control of the printer remotely. Other printer attacks range from stealing print jobs containing sensitive information to pilfering system files.

Work Arounds

One potential solution to the problem, Muller says, is to corral all the connected printers and put them on a separate network with a print server. The downside: it would require a network administrator to oversee two networks, which, he says, could be difficult for midsized companies and result in the additional costs of installing and monitoring a second firewall.

"What CISOs should really do is ask themselves do they really need a device connected," Muller says. "It may make sense not to connect the printer to the cloud."

Related Content:

Dawn Kawamoto is an Associate Editor for Dark Reading, where she covers cybersecurity news and trends. She is an award-winning journalist who has written and edited technology, management, leadership, career, finance, and innovation stories for such publications as CNET's ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Data Privacy Protections for the Most Vulnerable -- Children
Dimitri Sirota, Founder & CEO of BigID,  10/17/2019
State of SMB Insecurity by the Numbers
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  10/17/2019
Tor Weaponized to Steal Bitcoin
Dark Reading Staff 10/18/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
2019 Online Malware and Threats
2019 Online Malware and Threats
As cyberattacks become more frequent and more sophisticated, enterprise security teams are under unprecedented pressure to respond. Is your organization ready?
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-8087
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-22
Information Leakage in PPPoE Packet Padding in AVM Fritz!Box 7490 with Firmware versions Fritz!OS 6.80 and 6.83 allows physically proximate attackers to view slices of previously transmitted packets or portions of memory via via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2019-10079
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-22
Apache Traffic Server is vulnerable to HTTP/2 setting flood attacks. Earlier versions of Apache Traffic Server didn't limit the number of setting frames sent from the client using the HTTP/2 protocol. Users should upgrade to Apache Traffic Server 7.1.7, 8.0.4, or later versions.
CVE-2019-12147
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-22
The Sangoma Session Border Controller (SBC) 2.3.23-119 GA web interface is vulnerable to Argument Injection via special characters in the username field. Upon successful exploitation, a remote unauthenticated user can create a local system user with sudo privileges, and use that user to login to the...
CVE-2019-12148
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-22
The Sangoma Session Border Controller (SBC) 2.3.23-119 GA web interface is vulnerable to an authentication bypass via an argument injection vulnerability involving special characters in the username field. Upon successful exploitation, a remote unauthenticated user can login into the device's admin ...
CVE-2019-12290
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-22
GNU libidn2 before 2.2.0 fails to perform the roundtrip checks specified in RFC3490 Section 4.2 when converting A-labels to U-labels. This makes it possible in some circumstances for one domain to impersonate another. By creating a malicious domain that matches a target domain except for the inclusi...