Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

01:00 PM
Pieter Danhieux
Pieter Danhieux
Connect Directly
E-Mail vvv

Hiding in Plain Sight: What the SolarWinds Attack Revealed About Efficacy

Multilayered infiltration involved custom malicious tooling, backdoors, and cloaked code, far beyond the skills of script kiddies.

If ever there was something to ruin Christmas in the cybersecurity industry, it's a devastating data breach that is on track to becoming the largest cyberespionage event affecting the US government on record. 

The SolarWinds attack is far reaching, with threat actors having initially breached the software as early as mid-2019. This months-long heist was discovered in December 2020 after the scheme was used to infiltrate prominent cybersecurity firm, FireEye, and the nightmare unraveled from there. The full scope of the breach is still being investigated, but key areas of infiltration include US Departments of State, Homeland Security, Commerce, and the Treasury, in addition to the National Institutes of Health. 

Related Content:

7 Things We Know So Far About the SolarWinds Attacks

Special Report: How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem

New From The Edge: Unemployment Fraud: As If Being Out of Work Wasn't Bad Enough

This incident is going to have ongoing aftershocks, but the sheer sophistication of it is fascinating. At a technical level, it is a multilayered infiltration involving custom malicious tooling, backdoors, and cloaked code, far beyond the skill of script kiddies we so often see exploiting more obvious errors.

Code Laundering at Its Best Worst
CrowdStrike has done more of their genius work in reverse-engineering the exploit, and detailing the findings for all to see. It has now come to light that SolarWinds was the victim of an infrastructure breach, allowing malicious code injection into system updates, resulting in at least four separate malware tools opening up unprecedented access for the threat actors.

The method was covert, allowing for a strategic precision that seems straight out of a Jason Bourne novel. It bought time to sniff around, plan, and strike victims outside of the SolarWinds network exactly when they wanted, in a comprehensive supply chain attack. And it was all carried out with code that looked completely benign. 

Cyberattacks are often the result of simple, yet costly, errors. Once discovered, the mistakes are fairly obvious; think a poorly configured network, passwords stored in plaintext, or unpatched software that sits vulnerable to known exploits. In this case, the code didn't stand out at all, and not just to developers and security engineers. A wide myriad of expensive, complex security technology failed to detect it too.  

Tools Rendered Virtually Useless
Security professionals are aided in their quest to safeguard enormous amounts of company data, software, and infrastructure, by a technology stack that is customized to the security needs of the business. This usually takes the form of components like network firewalls, automated penetration testing, monitoring and scanning tools, with the latter soaking up a lot of time in the software development process. This tooling can quickly spiral and become unruly to manage and execute, with many companies using upward of 300 different products and services.

SolarWinds would have an eye-watering array of tools to find and highlight security bugs in code, attempted unauthorized network access, potential compromise in any part of the infrastructure, and even pick up on signs of detection evasion. It is unprecedented that these threat actors were able to inject malicious code that went undiscovered even by the most advanced security stack. 

Infrastructure hardening — especially access control — is a fundamental component of general cybersecurity best practice, but if an attacker can quietly exploit a tiny window of opportunity, then a network can be compromised just the same as a vulnerability in stand-alone software. 

This breach is a reminder that, in general, any company that relies heavily on tools alone to secure its network infrastructure and software is taking an enormous risk. It's not always enough to protect code; everything storing, running, and compiling it must be equally as fortified. The ideal state is a balance of tools and people, executing a robust strategy that goes deep in assessing and reducing the potential attack surface.

Benefits of Cross-Team Security Awareness
The SolarWinds breach has already started to make a significant impact on security operations, especially at a government level. Experts are touting that this could reshape cybersecurity practices forever.

An increasingly digital infrastructure powers our lives, and while it can be vulnerable to attack if not meticulously managed, our general strategy is flawed. We are wildly understaffed when it comes to security expertise, yet we're not doing a whole lot to close the gap. Human-driven security awareness is an underutilized element of cybersecurity, as is making prevention rather than reaction a priority. 

Infrastructure security is a complex undertaking with many moving parts, but, similar to how they are positioned in software creation, developers can be an asset in reducing structural risk if properly trained and security-aware. 

Threat modeling rarely accounts for supply-chain attacks, despite this type of attack being highlighted as early as 2012 as a key risk that is difficult to prevent with current techniques, and it leaves many companies underprepared. Software developers could absolutely play a role in prevention, and it starts with ensuring they are upskilled and able to assess their code integrity from the inside out. Have they built the update mechanism securely? Is the software running with unnecessary connectivity that could allow for easier malicious compromise? 

When security is synonymous with software quality, it is easy to see the immense value a security-aware engineer can bring to the table.

Pieter Danhieux is a globally recognised security expert, with over 12 years experience as a security consultant and 8 years as a Principal Instructor for SANS teaching offensive techniques on how to target and assess organisations, systems and individuals for security ... View Full Bio

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Ransomware Is Not the Problem
Adam Shostack, Consultant, Entrepreneur, Technologist, Game Designer,  6/9/2021
How Can I Test the Security of My Home-Office Employees' Routers?
John Bock, Senior Research Scientist,  6/7/2021
New Ransomware Group Claiming Connection to REvil Gang Surfaces
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  6/10/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Zero Trust doesn't have to break your budget!
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-18
Use of hard-coded credentials vulnerability in php component in Synology Calendar before 2.4.0-0761 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-18
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in cgi component in Synology Media Server before 1.8.3-2881 allows remote attackers to access intranet resources via unspecified vectors.
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-18
Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('Command Injection') vulnerability in task management component in Synology Download Station before 3.8.16-3566 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-18
Improper privilege management vulnerability in cgi component in Synology Download Station before 3.8.16-3566 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-18
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in task management component in Synology Download Station before 3.8.16-3566 allows remote authenticated users to access intranet resources via unspecified vectors.