Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

12/9/2013
05:17 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Hacking The Zero-Day Vulnerability Market

Private brokers sell zero-day bugs for anywhere between $40,000 and $160,000 -- and in some cases buyers could end up spending much more for lucrative targets, new analysis says

A zero-day vulnerability remains private and unknown to the affected software vendor and its users for an average of 151 days.

And on any given day, knowledge of some 85 zero-day flaws are available from boutique exploit providers, according to new analysis of the growing market for these vulnerabilities. Boutique firms, which sell their vulnerability finds to companies and governments, are able to offer more than 100 exploits a year, according to NSS Labs research director Stefan Frei, who has written a new report on just how pervasive and available these "known unknown" zero-day flaws actually are.

And these estimates, according to Frei, are on the low end of the actual numbers. The operations of cybercriminals and nation-states' zero-day activities are not fully known. "This is really a minimum estimate," says Frei, who conducted his analysis using publicly available information.

"Using data from known exploit programs or boutique vendors like VUPEN and putting them all together and connecting the dots -- it's astonishing what you get," he says.

Take the NSA's 2013 budget of $25 million for the purchase of exploits, Frei says. Given that the market price for an exploit ranges from $40,000 to $250,000, this could result in 86 to 541 additional "unknown known" bugs per day floating around, according to his calculations.

[UPDATED 12/10/13 to correct context of dollar figure reference:]
Hitting a particularly valuable target could mean investing even more: "Some [targets] are worth $500,000 or even $1 million," Frei says. If the expected revenue from a target were $10 million, for example, he says, a buyer could spend up to $1 million for an exploit.

A wave of vendors, the most conspicuous being Microsoft, has launched bug bounty programs over the past year or so to attempt to encourage responsible disclosure by researchers and to try to compete with the black market underground for bugs. But with legal zero-day vulnerability providers, such as VUPEN Security, also in the mix, bug bounty programs still face stiff competition.

"They cannot compete," Frei says.

[Microsoft and Facebook co-sponsor community bug bounty program that pays researchers for flaws found in popular open-source software and in Internet protocols. See New Bucks For Bugs Program Focuses On Open-Source Software, Internet Infrastructure.]

Frei crunched the numbers from two major commercial vulnerability purchase programs at iDefense and TippingPoint's Zero Day Initiative from when they were launched in 2002 and 2005, respectively, through September of this year. The two programs in all purchased nearly 2,400 bugs, Frei found, and the timeframe between purchase and disclosure of the flaws was 133 for iDefense and 174 for ZDI.

And drilling down for the years 2010, 2011, and 2012, he found the two companies had published some 1,026 vulnerabilities. "On any given day during those three years, the VCP and ZDI programs possessed 58 unpublished vulnerabilities" affecting Microsoft, Apple, Oracle, or Adobe, the report says.

Boutique vulnerability providers, such as VUPEN Security, ReVuln, NetraGard, Endgame Systems, and Exodus Intelligence, sell subscriptions that include 25 zero-day flaws per year for $2.5 million. Frei says such pricing has cracked the monopoly of nation-states as the main customers of these bugs.

Nation-states are still major buyers, however. "[The boutique vendors] saw a drop in purchases on the government side" during the U.S. government sequester, he says. But that just means "they sell to the other side more," he says.

Jarno Limnell, director of cybersecurity for McAfee's Stonesoft, says the report is a grim reminder that there are plenty of unknown threats circulating below the surface. "That's very scary," he says of the findings. "We also have to keep in mind that a lot of issues are happening in the Internet that we are not even aware of."

The problem then is that some organizations just focus on what is known. "You need to understand the importance of these unknown [threats] and increase resilience," Limnell says.

Frei's full report is available here (PDF) for download.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Florida Town Pays $600K to Ransomware Operators
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/20/2019
Pledges to Not Pay Ransomware Hit Reality
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  6/21/2019
AWS CISO Talks Risk Reduction, Development, Recruitment
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/25/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-1619
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and execute arbitrary actions with administrative privileges on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper session ...
CVE-2019-1620
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to upload arbitrary files on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to incorrect permission settings in affected DCNM software. An attacker could ex...
CVE-2019-1621
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain access to sensitive files on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to incorrect permissions settings on affected DCNM software. An attacker...
CVE-2019-1622
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve sensitive information from an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper access controls for certain URLs on affected DCNM software...
CVE-2019-10133
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-26
A flaw was found in Moodle before 3.7, 3.6.4, 3.5.6, 3.4.9 and 3.1.18. The form to upload cohorts contained a redirect field, which was not restricted to internal URLs.