Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

Flaws Reported in Bank of America System

Sestus, rival to vendor of Bank of America's SiteKey authentication system, reports vulnerabilities in the Sitekey technology

The authentication technology used by Sitekey, Bank of America's online customer service system, is flawed and could make the bank vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks, a vendor said yesterday in a report that was disputed by both the bank and its primary contractor.

The two-factor authentication system offered by Bank of America, which allows a user to select a separate image file to help verify his/her identity, was developed by Passmark, an authentication tool vendor now owned by RSA Security.

But in a bit of vendor gamesmanship, the vulnerability report was issued by Sestus, a Passmark rival that also makes multi-factor authentication technology. Sestus, maker of PhishCops, has been critical of the Passmark technology in the past, publishing other documents that put Sitekey in a negative light.

In this case, however, Sestus reported the discovery of a "previously unreported vulnerability" in the Bank of America system that would enable an attacker to exploit the bank's lockout process to launch a denial-of-service attack on Sitekey, effectively preventing customers from accessing their accounts online.

"It appears that this lockout process can be exploited by malicious hackers to remotely lock out customers from their accounts en masse, or used by fraudsters in a hybrid lockout/phishing attack to access the actual account," the report said. The researchers did not publish a proof of concept with the vulnerability report.

In a series of three different scenarios, Sestus described how an attacker might use scripts and commonly-used login words to guess Bank of America customer login information, then type invalid information when the system requests the second authentication factor. Such an exploit would effectively lock users out of their accounts and tie up Bank of America systems, the vendor said. Attackers might also create a look-alike "error" page to phish personal information away from frustrated users, according to the report.

The vulnerability is not unique to Sitekey, but it could be exploited in any system that requests personal information before verifying the authenticity of the Web page, Sestus observed.

According to a Bank of America spokeswoman, the vulnerability doesn't threaten the safety of users' data. "It's not an issue that poses a risk to customers' information," she says. However, the vulnerability could lock out users if a hacker launched a denial-of-service attack, she says, and "anything that would be an inconvenience to our customers would be a concern for us."

Louie Gasparini, CTO of the RSA unit that now owns the Passmark technology, put a finer point on his response. "There's no vulnerability here that hasn't been in online banking systems for the past 10 years," he says. "This is the way the [banking authentication] system has always worked, and it's not unique to Sitekey or Passmark."

— Tim Wilson, Site Editor, Dark Reading

  • RSA Security Inc. (Nasdaq: EMC)
  • Sestus Data Corp.

    Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    Zero-Factor Authentication: Owning Our Data
    Nick Selby, Chief Security Officer at Paxos Trust Company,  2/19/2020
    44% of Security Threats Start in the Cloud
    Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/19/2020
    Ransomware Damage Hit $11.5B in 2019
    Dark Reading Staff 2/20/2020
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Current Issue
    6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
    This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
    Flash Poll
    How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
    How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
    The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
    Heap-based buffer overflow in Xchat-WDK before 1499-4 (2012-01-18) xchat 2.8.6 on Maemo architecture could allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (xchat client crash) or execute arbitrary code via a UTF-8 line from server containing characters outside of the Basic Multilingual Plane (BM...
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
    Information-disclosure vulnerability in Netsurf through 2.8 due to a world-readable cookie jar.
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
    The HTTPS protocol, as used in unspecified web applications, can encrypt compressed data without properly obfuscating the length of the unencrypted data, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain plaintext secret values by observing length differences during a series of guesses...
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
    Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Autonomy KeyView IDOL before 10.16, as used in Symantec Mail Security for Microsoft Exchange before 6.5.8, Symantec Mail Security for Domino before 8.1.1, Symantec Messaging Gateway before 10.0.1, Symantec Data Loss Prevention (DLP) before 11.6.1, IBM Notes 8....
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
    Insecure plugin update mechanism in tucan through 0.3.10 could allow remote attackers to perform man-in-the-middle attacks and execute arbitrary code ith the permissions of the user running tucan.