Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

DR Survey: Insiders Take the Cake

Dark Reading regulars say the biggest threat comes from within their own organization

If you're anything like other Dark Reading readers, you're worrying a lot less about exploits that threaten the Internet and a lot more about the ones that could hit your own organization.

That's one of the things we've learned so far as we review the results of our first annual reader survey here. The survey will remain open until June 8.

When asked which threats they considered most important for coverage in the next six months, readers so far have come down heavily on the side of exploits that might affect them directly. "Insider threats" is the biggest vote-getter so far, getting the nod from about 16 percent of respondents. "Targeted attacks" is a close second, with about 15 percent of the votes.

Thirteen percent of readers consider identity theft to be the most important threat, while 12 percent are most concerned about portable device security.

By contrast, threats that might affect the Web at large are relatively low on Dark Reading readers' priority lists. Only 3 percent of respondents (so far) list phishing as their most important threat. Worms/viruses (less than four percent) and denial of service attacks (less than four percent) have received only a little bit more attention. SQL injection rounds out the bottom four (4.3 percent).

Readers clearly have been influenced by recent disclosures of security violations in other organizations. When asked what types of news coverage they'd like to see more in the coming year, nearly half of all readers requested more information on security breaches. "Analysis of hacker activities and how to stop them" is a close second (44.76 percent).

One reader expressed concerns about the way vulnerability information is collected and tabulated. "There is a lack of intelligence gathering in IT security," he says. "We are protecting our people based on what vendors tell us is out there, and that's bad." Security pros need more unbiased sources of attack and vulnerability data, he says.

In addition to measuring security pros' perceptions about attacks and threats, the survey includes a number of questions about Dark Reading and what readers would like to see from the site in the coming year. Our editors will offer some feedback on your input, as well as some ideas on how we can respond, in the weeks ahead.

— Tim Wilson, Site Editor, Dark Reading

Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
SOC 2s & Third-Party Assessments: How to Prevent Them from Being Used in a Data Breach Lawsuit
Beth Burgin Waller, Chair, Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Practice , Woods Rogers PLC,  12/5/2019
Navigating Security in the Cloud
Diya Jolly, Chief Product Officer, Okta,  12/4/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
domain/section/markdown/markdown.go in Documize before 3.5.1 mishandles untrusted Markdown content. This was addressed by adding the bluemonday HTML sanitizer to defend against XSS.
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in the Xtivia Web Time and Expense (WebTE) interface used for Microsoft Dynamics NAV before 2017 allows an attacker to download arbitrary files by specifying arbitrary values for the recId and filename parameters of the /Home/GetAttachment fun...
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
phpMyAdmin before 4.9.2 does not escape certain Git information, related to libraries/classes/Display/GitRevision.php and libraries/classes/Footer.php.
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-05
A Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in LDAP Account Manager (LAM) Pro 3.6 in the filter parameter to cmd.php in an export and exporter_id action. and the filteruid parameter to list.php.
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-05
A Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in LDAP Account Manager (LAM) Pro 3.6 in the export, add_value_form, and dn parameters to cmd.php.