Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

8/15/2013
06:14 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Don't Underestimate Directory Traversal Attacks

Are attackers dot-dot-slashing their way into your data?

About as simple to fix as they are to exploit, directory traversal vulnerabilities stand as a persistent threat in the application environment. Yet it is one that many developers and even security teams are unaware can lead attackers to gain valuable information about how a system is organized, to get access to sensitive files on the application server, or even to easily leverage to start other attacks on that server or the rest of the network.

Perhaps not as favored as SQL injection, directory traversal attacks can wreak a lot of damage by taking advantage of the way applications access files not really meant to be accessed by that application.

"What a directory traversal attack is is an attempt to circumvent a URL or a request to a website by trying to get the application to point in the wrong direction," says Barry Shteiman, senior security strategist for Imperva, explaining that often all it takes is a well-placed "../" expression in a user-input field or, even within URLs in the case of RESTful Web services, for attackers to get a vulnerable app to allow them to climb the directory for unauthorized access. "A ../ to the server means, 'Let's go back a directory on the back-end server structure.' Every time you do that, the application climbs higher to a previous state."

[Did you miss Black Hat USA? See Dark Reading's Black Hat coverage to catch up the highlights from talks and research presented at the show.]

Using a directory traversal attack, which is also frequently referred to as path traversal, it's often possible for an attacker to go as far back as the C drive of the server. From there, the world is an attacker's oyster -- they can frequently steal information directly from there or use information they've gained to launch other attacks.

"When an app is vulnerable to this, it is commonly because it is not validating inputs or has a very old version of [Web server software] which does not enforce a bounded file system root location," says Scott Parcel, CTO of Cenzic. "Also it is easier to accept file names for some selections than to present a choice of mapped names. If accepting and using actual file names, different names and paths can be forced into the input and thus cause operations on files not indented to be referenced in this way."

According to Imperva's most recent "Web Application Attack Report," released last month, directory traversal attacks against retail Web applications made up 31 percent of the attacks compared to the eight most prevalent types of attacks, and they made up 36 percent of attacks against all other industries' Web apps. In retail, that number lagged behind a whopping 53 percent of SQL injection attacks, but in other verticals it even led SQLi, which only made 27 percent of attacks. Meanwhile, secure hosting firm FireHost also reported last month in its Superfecta attack statistics about four major attacks it commonly blocks -- XSS, directory traversal, cross-site request forgery, and SQL injection -- directory traversal ranked second behind XSS, making up 23 percent of the 9.8 million attacks blocked from these four major categories using its IP Reputation Management system.

And according to Chris Wysopal, CTO and co-founder of Veracode, three years of data from more than 20,000 applications the firm has tested have found that applications with one or more directory flaws is at 49 percent and has been steady during those years.

"Directory traversal is actually the vulnerability developers fix the least, even when they know it is in their app," Wysopal says. "Developers either don't understand the risks of directory traversal or don't see much risk in it. On the contrary, directory traversal vulnerabilities that can be used to access files that should remain confidential can also be used to modify files on the application server."

As organizations seek to mitigate the threat of these attacks, input validation is crucial, says Parcel.

"Validation should check not only for prefix characters, such as "../..", but for a limited enumeration of indirect names," he says. "In general, accepting actual file names from Web inputs should be avoided unless that part of the application is intentionally presenting the concept of files as entities that users are manipulating, such as would be the case for Google Drive Web pages."

Meanwhile, Web application firewalls can be used to catch common phrases used, but organizations have to be careful they don't break apps because coders frequently hard-wire directory traversal right into their apps, Shteiman says.

"A lot of developers in the world, just for means of convenience, embed directory traversal into their code," he says, explaining that they may use coding shortcuts to avoid having to do painstaking changes to file names when application or system versions change. "It makes mitigation just a little bit harder because you can't really do a signature on it. If the application is written this way, you're going to have a false positive, and then you just kept your application from working."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Mobile Banking Malware Up 50% in First Half of 2019
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/17/2020
Exploits Released for As-Yet Unpatched Critical Citrix Flaw
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  1/13/2020
Microsoft to Officially End Support for Windows 7, Server 2008
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/13/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
[Just Released] How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
[Just Released] How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-7227
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-18
Westermo MRD-315 1.7.3 and 1.7.4 devices have an information disclosure vulnerability that allows an authenticated remote attacker to retrieve the source code of different functions of the web application via requests that lack certain mandatory parameters. This affects ifaces-diag.asp, system.asp, ...
CVE-2019-15625
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-18
A memory usage vulnerability exists in Trend Micro Password Manager 3.8 that could allow an attacker with access and permissions to the victim's memory processes to extract sensitive information.
CVE-2019-19696
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-18
A RootCA vulnerability found in Trend Micro Password Manager for Windows and macOS exists where the localhost.key of RootCA.crt might be improperly accessed by an unauthorized party and could be used to create malicious self-signed SSL certificates, allowing an attacker to misdirect a user to phishi...
CVE-2019-19697
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-18
An arbitrary code execution vulnerability exists in the Trend Micro Security 2019 (v15) consumer family of products which could allow an attacker to gain elevated privileges and tamper with protected services by disabling or otherwise preventing them to start. An attacker must already have administr...
CVE-2019-20357
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-18
A Persistent Arbitrary Code Execution vulnerability exists in the Trend Micro Security 2020 (v160 and 2019 (v15) consumer familiy of products which could potentially allow an attacker the ability to create a malicious program to escalate privileges and attain persistence on a vulnerable system.