Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

5/28/2014
12:00 PM
Felix Leder
Felix Leder
Commentary
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

Dissecting Dendroid: An In-Depth Look Inside An Android RAT Kit

Dendroid is full of surprises to assist it in subverting traditional security tactics through company-issued Android phones or BYOD.

In March, alarms went off when security researchers discovered the Android malware creation kit Dendroid was being advertised in malware forums for sale to anyone who wanted to automate the distribution process for a mere $300.

Dendroid consists of a web-based administration panel and a builder that can add “Remote Administration Toolkit” (RAT) functionality by repackaging it with existing applications. Researchers disclosed how easy it is to patch Dendroid into existing apps (which is scary enough, given how quick users are to download new apps) but what sets Dendroid apart is the myriad of malicious functionality it possesses to exploit an Android device.

One of the most frightening examples of Dendroid capabilities is that it can secretly record all of your phone calls or silently listen in on your phone’s microphone whenever it wants. The malware can also upload all of your phone’s pictures. Imagine walking into the office, going on an interview, or applying for a bank loan one day and have to face your entire digital personal history on display. Even costlier than personal embarrassment, though, is the potential risk Dendroid poses for businesses using company-issued Android devices or supporting a BYOD policy. Pictures of notes from brainstorming sessions or intellectual property are temptingly at risk of exploitation.

Diverging from the data-loss theme for a moment, Dendroid can also perform “classic” Android malware functions, such as sending SMS messages to premium-rate numbers without making its owner aware until the huge bill arrives.

Even worse is the fact that Dendroid is clever enough that it can hide in plain sight, packaging itself inside an application that appears to be a parental control tool. One area where this can really wreak havoc is with parental control apps that require several of the same privileges as the RAT, such as accessing GPS coordinates or checking installed apps. This allows Dendroid to sneak by defenses, even with manual inspection, while secretly requesting permissions to access a long list of questionable applications and actions including:

  • INTERNET
  • CAMERA
  • READ_SMS
  • WRITE_SMS
  • READ_CONTACTS
  • WAKE_LOCK
  • CALL_PHONE
  • RECORD_AUDIO

Dendroid is full of surprises to assist it in subverting traditional security tactics. In this screenshot, you can see how Dendroid authors use configurations and commands to further their efforts:

Notice the flag called “GPlayBypass,” which stands for “Google Play Bypass.” This functionality is designed to help the malware evade detection by Google Bouncer, a sandboxing tool through which almost every app has to run before it is allowed into the Google Play store. It’s just one of the many tools Dendroid wields in its quest to cause the greatest amount of harm to your Android device.

In the end, of course, it’s all about money for Dendroid. In this malware forum post from October 2013, the author advertises the sale of Dendroid source code for both the panel and the builder (including three months of support). He or she fondly notes in another section of the post that the project took “1.3 years to fully develop”:

Dendroid’s large variety of available commands shows the full threat potential that an infected phone can have. The emulator detection is simple, but it is likely to work in various analysis environments. Since the kit includes components to repackage existing apps, we can expect to see more of Dendroid in the future.

All in all, this is a very interesting piece of malware, and a difficult one to detect. Users of network forensics appliances should look for indications of the traffic patterns, which you can read about in greater detail in my full blog post, Dendroid under the hood.

Felix Leder leads mobile malware research at Blue Coat Systems Norway. He has been instrumental in developing a number of malware analysis solutions, including Cuckoo box, Norman's Malware Analyzer G2, and Blue Coat's MAA. After beginning his career in the mobile space with ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
_g3nuin3
50%
50%
_g3nuin3,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/28/2014 | 1:14:01 PM
based off Androrat
It should also be mentioned that a major portion of the code and its overall basis was actually taken from the open source project androrat. https://github.com/DesignativeDave/androrat
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
5/28/2014 | 2:19:47 PM
Re: based off Androrat
Thanks @_g3nuin3 Here is the live link to that 

 
Robert McDougal
50%
50%
Robert McDougal,
User Rank: Ninja
5/28/2014 | 4:58:08 PM
Re: based off Androrat
One thing I feel is prudent to mention here is that Google only scans apps on the Play store for Malware when they are first uploaded.  An existing app on your phone could be updated with this malware and through the course of a normal update you could be infected.  This was an issue with Chrome extensions a few months back and Google supposedly changed their scanning practice, but I never heard of a change to their Play store scanning practices.
FelixLeder
50%
50%
FelixLeder,
User Rank: Author
5/28/2014 | 5:16:46 PM
Re: based off Androrat
That's a very important point, Robert. Charlie Miller and Jon Oberheide did some research on bouncer: https://jon.oberheide.org/files/summercon12-bouncer.pdf Unfortunatley, we are seeing more and more malware using their findings. Fortunately, this can be used to scan for suspicious candidates.
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 10/23/2020
7 Tips for Choosing Security Metrics That Matter
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  10/19/2020
Russian Military Officers Unmasked, Indicted for High-Profile Cyberattack Campaigns
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  10/19/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-24847
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-23
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability is identified in FruityWifi through 2.4. Due to a lack of CSRF protection in page_config_adv.php, an unauthenticated attacker can lure the victim to visit his website by social engineering or another attack vector. Due to this issue, an unauthenticat...
CVE-2020-24848
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-23
FruityWifi through 2.4 has an unsafe Sudo configuration [(ALL : ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL]. This allows an attacker to perform a system-level (root) local privilege escalation, allowing an attacker to gain complete persistent access to the local system.
CVE-2020-5990
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-23
NVIDIA GeForce Experience, all versions prior to 3.20.5.70, contains a vulnerability in the ShadowPlay component which may lead to local privilege escalation, code execution, denial of service or information disclosure.
CVE-2020-25483
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-23
An arbitrary command execution vulnerability exists in the fopen() function of file writes of UCMS v1.4.8, where an attacker can gain access to the server.
CVE-2020-5977
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-23
NVIDIA GeForce Experience, all versions prior to 3.20.5.70, contains a vulnerability in NVIDIA Web Helper NodeJS Web Server in which an uncontrolled search path is used to load a node module, which may lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, and information disclosure.