Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

3/19/2019
04:25 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

DDoS Attack Size Drops 85% in Q4 2018

The sharp decline follows an FBI takedown of so-called "booter," or DDoS-for-hire, websites in December 2018.

The average distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack size shrunk 85% in the fourth quarter of 2018 following an FBI takedown of "booter," or DDoS-for-hire, websites, in December 2018, researchers report.

Late last year, United States authorities seized 15 popular domains as part of an international crackdown on booter sites. Cybercriminals can use booter websites (also known as "stresser" websites) to pay to launch DDoS attacks against specific targets and take them offline. Booter sites open the door for lesser-skilled attackers to launch devastating threats against victim websites.

About a year before the takedown, the FBI issued an advisory detailing how booter services can drive the scale and frequency of DDoS attacks. These services, advertised in Dark Web forums and marketplaces, can be used to legitimately test network resilience but also make it easy for cyberattackers to launch DDoS attacks against an existing network of infected devices.

The shutdown of prominent booter sites made a pronounced difference in DDoS attack trends for the fourth quarter of 2018, researchers report in Nexusguard's DDoS Threat Report 2018 Q4. During the most recent quarter, the number of DDoS attacks fell nearly 11% year-over-year, and the maximum attack size decreased nearly 24%. The biggest difference was in attack size, which dropped 85%.

Booter sites are the origin for many DDoS attacks as they make it "fairly simple" for amateur hackers to take down websites, explains Donny Chong, product director at Nexusguard. While the shutdown of booter sites had a positive effect on DDoS trends year-over-year, the growing prevalence of the "bit-and-piece" technique caused attacks to grow quarter-over-quarter.

The bit-and-piece tactic avoids detection by injecting small pieces of malicious code into legitimate traffic across hundreds of IP prefixes, Chong explains. By using small bits of junk, adversaries avoid sounding the alarms that large traffic spikes would set off. Between third and fourth quarters of 2018, this method caused the number of attacks, and the maximum and average attack sizes, to increase 36%, 49%, and 3.75%, respectively, Nexusguard researchers found.

Nexusguard noticed the bit-and-piece trend emerge in the third quarter, when it was the focus of its threat report. Unlike in a typical DDoS attack, in which an actor identifies and targets a particular IP address, bit-and-piece attacks are spread across multiple IP addresses on the same prefix. Diffused traffic can cause service providers to miss large-scale DDoS attacks in progress.

SSDP Amplification Attacks Ramp Up
SSDP amplification attacks are the most popular bit-and-piece attack vector and increased by 3,122% year-over-year and 91.2% quarter-over-quarter, Nexusguard reports. This type of attack, which made up 48.3% of DDoS attacks overall, is launched over UDP via Universal Plug and Play devices (printers, webcams, routers, and servers, for example).

In SSDP amplification attacks, adversaries first scan exploitable devices and use botnets to send UDP packets with a target's spoofed IP address to UDP Port 1900 of all vulnerable devices. Devices "respond massively," researchers explain, and the target is overwhelmed with replies.

Will cybercriminals leverage bit-and-piece attacks in lieu of DDoS attacks following the booter site shutdown? "It's going to be very dependent on who they are attacking," says Chong. In the world of DDoS, where attackers really study their targets, some attacks could be more effective. He calls it a "cat-and-mouse" game between cyberattackers and defenders: Even as criminals adopt SSDP and UDP attacks, targets will start to catch on to their patterns and block them.

Chong believes DDoS-for-hire websites are sure to make a comeback. "Definitely," he notes, adding that the decline in DDoS attack size is likely to reverse itself in the future. "These booters represent only a surface of the entire problem. [They're] payment gateways, the shopping carts by which you activate those botnets." Further, he explains, the growth of consumer Internet of Things contributes to the number of vulnerable devices exposed to cyberattacks.

Related Content:

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
The Problem with Proprietary Testing: NSS Labs vs. CrowdStrike
Brian Monkman, Executive Director at NetSecOPEN,  7/19/2019
How Attackers Infiltrate the Supply Chain & What to Do About It
Shay Nahari, Head of Red-Team Services at CyberArk,  7/16/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
The Linux Foundation ONOS 1.15.0 and ealier is affected by: Improper Input Validation. The impact is: The attacker can remotely execute any commands by sending malicious http request to the controller. The component is: Method runJavaCompiler in YangLiveCompilerManager.java. The attack vector is: ne...
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
Frog CMS 1.1 is affected by: Cross Site Scripting (XSS). The impact is: Cookie stealing, Alert pop-up on page, Redirecting to another phishing site, Executing browser exploits. The component is: Snippets.
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
Ilias 5.3 before 5.3.12; 5.2 before 5.2.21 is affected by: Cross Site Scripting (XSS) - CWE-79 Type 2: Stored XSS (or Persistent). The impact is: Execute code in the victim's browser. The component is: Assessment / TestQuestionPool. The attack vector is: Cloze Test Text gap (attacker) / Corrections ...
CVE-2019-9959
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
The JPXStream::init function in Poppler 0.78.0 and earlier doesn't check for negative values of stream length, leading to an Integer Overflow, thereby making it possible to allocate a large memory chunk on the heap, with a size controlled by an attacker, as demonstrated by pdftocairo.
CVE-2019-4236
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
A IBM Spectrum Protect 7.l client backup or archive operation running for an HP-UX VxFS object is silently skipping Access Control List (ACL) entries from backup or archive if there are more than twelve ACL entries associated with the object in total. As a result, it could allow a local attacker to ...