Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

1/6/2017
04:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Cyber Deterrence Should Be Key Focus For Trump Administration, Task Force Says

Time for US to strengthen consequences for cyberattacks, CSIS says in recommendations to incoming administration.

A Washington think tank, in an apparent rebuke of the Obama administrtion, issued a set of recommendations for the Trump Administration Thursday, advising against overeliance on the private sector to fix national sector cybersecurity challenges and against assumptions the government will work as a single entity to execute on security initiatives. 

The set of recommendations comes from the Center for Strategic and International Studies and highlights some things the new government should avoid if it wants to make more progress on cybersecurity than the previous administration. 

The recommendations are contained in a document titled “From Awareness to Action: A Cybersecurity Agenda for the 45th President” that Senator Sheldon Whitehouse [D-RI] and House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Michael McCaul [R-TX] released publicly at a press conference Thursday.

The recent election showed the need for the President-elect and his national security team to address the scope and the severity of the cyber threat the country faces, Whitehouse said in releasing the report. The CSIS recommendations offer ways the government and private sector can collaborate on bolstering national cybersecurity, he said.

The CSIS’ latest guidance for the Trump Administration builds on the advice it offered to the Obama transition team in 2009. One big emphasis is on measures the government should take to create meaningful consequences for foreign actors and criminals that attack US interests in cyberspace.

Since the last set of recommendations to the Obama Administration, the US has experienced an “immense” number of incidents involving cyber espionage, cybercrime and, more recently, attempts at political coercion via cyber attacks, the report said. The US will need to make greater use of threats to impose sanctions and pursue criminal charges against foreign threat actors that indulge in such activity, the CSIS said.

The use of such threats has resulted in China ratcheting back its commercial espionage activity in recent times and there’s no reason why they won’t work against other adversaries as well.

The report also recommends measures that would raise costs for attackers via proportionate responses. Recommended measures include actions that would make it harder for attackers to monetize stolen data and create uncertainty about the value of stolen credentials. In addition to calls for more punitive legal measures, the CSIS recommendations suggest the need for retaliatory measure for paralyzing the network infrastructures used by adversaries to launch cyber attacks.

Other recommendations include creating better ways to disrupt botnets, passing measures that make it easier for organizations to share incident data freely without fear of legal repercussions, and establishing standards and principals around IoT security.

Some of the language in the CSIS recommendations suggests disappointment over the pace of change on the cybersecurity front in recent years.

The Obama White House’s inherent belief that private industry would “spontaneously generate” solutions that would mitigate the need for government action was a mistake, CSIS said. Apparent concerns that the government would be seen as overbearing resulted in “hesitation, even timidity” in executive actions on cybersecurity.

A tendency by the government to bring in high-profile business executives to government and expecting them to run government like a corporate entity also contributed to a lack of progress, the CSIS said.

Related stories:

 

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/2/2020
Ripple20 Threatens Increasingly Connected Medical Devices
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/30/2020
DDoS Attacks Jump 542% from Q4 2019 to Q1 2020
Dark Reading Staff 6/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-9498
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
Apache Guacamole 1.1.0 and older may mishandle pointers involved inprocessing data received via RDP static virtual channels. If a userconnects to a malicious or compromised RDP server, a series ofspecially-crafted PDUs could result in memory corruption, possiblyallowing arbitrary code to be executed...
CVE-2020-3282
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition, Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service, and Cisco Unity Connection could allow an unauthenticated, remote attack...
CVE-2020-5909
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, when users run the command displayed in NGINX Controller user interface (UI) to fetch the agent installer, the server TLS certificate is not verified.
CVE-2020-5910
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the Neural Autonomic Transport System (NATS) messaging services in use by the NGINX Controller do not require any form of authentication, so any successful connection would be authorized.
CVE-2020-5911
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the NGINX Controller installer starts the download of Kubernetes packages from an HTTP URL On Debian/Ubuntu system.