Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

CSI/FBI: Violations, Losses Down

Security violations are down, but latest CSI/FBI research shows bigger losses elsewhere

If you think your company has actually experienced fewer security violations in the last year than it did the year before, and lost less money as a result, you're not crazy. In fact, according to a new report that will be issued tomorrow by the FBI and the Computer Security Institute, you may even be normal.

In their 11th annual poll of large enterprises, the CSI and the FBI report that 52 percent of organizations experienced unauthorized use of their computer systems in the last 12 month, down from 56 percent last year and 53 percent the year before. The percentage of respondents who say that there was no unauthorized use of their organization's computer systems increased from 31 percent last year to an all-time high of 38 percent this year.

The percentage of companies reporting six or more violations was also down to its lowest level in the survey's history with about 24 percent.

It's not all good news, however. Some categories of violations showed an increase in costs. Losses from laptop or mobile hardware theft, for example, grew from $19,562 per respondent in 2005 to $30,057 in 2006. Losses from telecommunication fraud rose from $2,750 last year to $12,377 this year. And the cost of Website defacement grew from $1,494 to $1,806.

Overall, though, the cost of security violations dropped in the past year, as it did the year before, according to the survey. "Taking the last two years together, there was a decline in average losses of $358,297, a two-year decline of over 68 percent," the report states. The CSI and the FBI attribute the decrease to the decline in reported incidents as well as dramatic increases in security investment by small and medium-sized firms.

In several cases, losses per incident also decreased in the last year, according to the survey. The cost of unauthorized access to information dropped from $303,234 in 2005 to $85,261 in 2006. The cost of viruses dropped from $179,781 to $69,125. And the costs of denial-of-service attacks dropped from $56,672 to $20,872.

Despite the relative dropoff in the frequency and costs of security incidents, enterprises continue to report ongoing threats. The majority of companies reported at least one security violation in the last 12 months. Most of the data losses come from outside the organization: Only 29 percent of respondents said that insider attacks accounted for more than 40 percent of their losses. Virus attacks and unauthorized access of systems are the two greatest sources of financial loss, according to the report.

What are IT departments doing about the violations? Some 98 percent have deployed firewalls, and 97 percent are using antivirus software. Seventy-nine percent have installed anti-spyware software, and 69 percent are using intrusion detection systems. Sixty-three percent are encrypting data in transit.

However, there are some "hot technologies" that still have not been deployed by a majority of enterprises. End-point security software, for example, has been deployed in only 31 percent of enterprises. Only 32 percent of respondents have installed wireless security products, and only 39 percent are using application firewalls. Sixty-one percent of respondents said they do no outsourcing of the security function.

What's at the top of the priority list? Seventy-three percent of respondents cited "data protection" as one of the most critical issues for the next two years. Sixty-three percent cited policy and regulatory compliance (such as SOX and HIPAA); 58 percent put identity theft and leakage of private information at the top of their lists (respondents were allowed more than one answer). Interestingly, fewer than 10 percent cited Web attacks, physical security, or end-point security as a top priority.

Despite the relative decline in incidence and losses due to security violations, the CSI and the FBI don't expect those losses to be eliminated anytime soon. "Regardless of measures an organization may take to protect its systems using technical computer security measures such as the use of passwords, biometrics, antivirus software and the like, there will be risks of financial loss that still remain," the report states.

— Tim Wilson, Site Editor, Dark Reading

  • Computer Security Institute (CSI)
  • Federal Bureau of Investigation

    Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

     

    Recommended Reading:

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
    Dark Reading Staff 5/27/2020
    10 iOS Security Tips to Lock Down Your iPhone
    Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  5/22/2020
    How an Industry Consortium Can Reinvent Security Solution Testing
    Henry Harrison, Co-founder & Chief Technology Officer, Garrison,  5/21/2020
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon Contest
    Current Issue
    How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
    This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
    Flash Poll
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2020-10737
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-27
    A race condition was found in the mkhomedir tool shipped with the oddjob package in versions before 0.34.5 and 0.34.6 wherein, during the home creation, mkhomedir copies the /etc/skel directory into the newly created home and changes its ownership to the home's user without properly checking the hom...
    CVE-2020-13622
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-27
    JerryScript 2.2.0 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure) because a property key query for a Proxy object returns unintended data.
    CVE-2020-13623
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-27
    JerryScript 2.2.0 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (stack consumption) via a proxy operation.
    CVE-2020-13616
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-26
    The boost ASIO wrapper in net/asio.cpp in Pichi before 1.3.0 lacks TLS hostname verification.
    CVE-2020-13614
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-26
    An issue was discovered in ssl.c in Axel before 2.17.8. The TLS implementation lacks hostname verification.