Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

6/27/2016
04:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Cerber Strikes With Office 365 Zero-Day Attacks

Ransomware variant continues its success through chameleon-like reinvention.

Variants of Cerber ransomware are pivoting yet again, this time targeting Office 365 email users with a zero-day attack that security experts say likely impacted millions of business users last week. According to a new report from cloud security provider Avanan today, Cerber changed up its attack M.O., shifting gears to utilize a zero-day attack that bypasses Office 365's built-in security tools and hammering Office 365 email users with a phishing campaign.

While Avanan couldn't measure the infection rate, it said that the campaign hit approximately 57 percent of organizations that it services that use Office 365. It said that the attack was detected by customers using Check Point's SandBlast Zero-Day Protection on the Avanan platform, with most traditional antiviruses not detecting the cloud email attack when it was initially found.

 “Many users of cloud email programs believe they 'outsourced' everything to Microsoft or Google, including security,” explains Gil Friedrich, CEO of Avanan. “The reality is that hackers first make sure their malware bypasses major cloud email providers' security measures, and so most new malware goes through cloud email programs undetected."

Like many successful ransomware variants, Cerber has maintained its high infection rates through constant reinvention and innovation. First cropping up at the end of February this year, Cerber initially made headway distributed through malvertising that was driven by the Magnituted and Nuclear exploit kits' use of Flash zero-day exploits, according to Trend Micro and FireEye researchers.  

By May, Cerber was seen delivered frequently by Dridex in spam campaigns that were seeking to drop the malware via malicious Microsoft Office documents taking advantage of macro vulnerability exploits, according to FireEye. And earlier this month, researchers with Invincea warned that Cerber was utilizing a polymorphic "hash factory" technique to change payloads on the fly as often as every 15 seconds in order to evade signature-based detection.

"When we tried to duplicate the download for this variant, we noticed that the hash we received from the payload delivery server had a different hash than the one in the event above. When we downloaded it a third time, there was yet another hash," wrote Pat Belcher with Invincea about their findings. "Fifteen seconds later, there was another, and then another. In all we downloaded over 40 uniquely hashed Cerber payloads – all with different hashes. It appeared we were dealing with a server-side malware factory."

Among all of the derivations, one unique factor seems to be threaded through all of the Cerber attacks.  The ransomware is designed to deliver its ransom demand via a spoken voice note that plays when a victim tries to open a file.

Related Content:

 

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-23534
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Upgrade.php of gopeak masterlab 2.1.5, via the 'source' parameter.
CVE-2021-27330
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
Triconsole Datepicker Calendar <3.77 is affected by cross-site scripting (XSS) in calendar_form.php. Attackers can read authentication cookies that are still active, which can be used to perform further attacks such as reading browser history, directory listings, and file contents.
CVE-2021-3124
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) in form field in robust.systems product Custom Global Variables v 1.0.5 allows a remote attacker to inject arbitrary code via the vars[0][name] field.
CVE-2021-21064
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
Magento UPWARD-php version 1.1.4 (and earlier) is affected by a Path traversal vulnerability in Magento UPWARD Connector version 1.1.2 (and earlier) due to the upload feature. An attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to upload a malicious YAML file that can contain instructions which...
CVE-2021-21065
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
Adobe Bridge version 11.0 (and earlier) is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability when parsing TTF files that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.