Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

9/13/2017
02:30 PM
Kelly Sheridan
Kelly Sheridan
Quick Hits
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Businesses Fail to Properly Secure, Assess SSH: ISACA

Frequently used but underappreciated, Secure Shell is rarely secured, assessed, documented, or managed in a systematic way, researchers report.

Most businesses use the Secure Shell (SSH) technology, a cryptographic protocol designed to enable secure file transfers and remote communications. However, it's rare they appropriately secure, document, routinely assess, and manage SSH, as reported in a new ISACA paper released Tuesday.

SSH was developed as a secure alternative to telnet and rsh/rexec. It's primarily used to allow a remote command shell (for example, the Bourne shell or C shell) over a network connection. It also allows port-forwarding capability and implements SFTP to allow secure file transfer.

It's essential for security leaders to ensure SSH is securely deployed and monitor its usage so it continues to protect against man-in-the-middle attacks, isn't misused by privileged insiders, or any number of other troubles. However, ISACA points out several challenges in doing all this well.

For one, businesses are struggling to manage and track SSH cryptographic keys. SSH is natively supported by Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, and other service providers that offer virtual Linux hosts. Each SSH server has its own key to authenticate the device to clients and as SSH hosts increase on premise and in the cloud, complexities of key management will grow.

There is also a challenge in deciding who is responsible for SSH keys. Usually it's unclear who should handle tasks like managing key inventory and usage, a complexity that underscores the need to integrate controls and processes into broader control management, ISACA explains.

SSH is critical from a security perspective but generally invisible to the business; as a result, executives tend to overlook it. It's necessary for system administrators to operate, but how it's managed doesn't usually affect business processes. This can make it tough to ensure SSH gets executive attention and is addressed in risk management and audit planning.

Read more about SSH challenges and considerations by looking at the full report here.

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
How SolarWinds Busted Up Our Assumptions About Code Signing
Dr. Jethro Beekman, Technical Director,  3/3/2021
News
'ObliqueRAT' Now Hides Behind Images on Compromised Websites
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  3/2/2021
News
Attackers Turn Struggling Software Projects Into Trojan Horses
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/26/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-21510
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-08
Dell iDRAC8 versions prior to 2.75.100.75 contain a host header injection vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability by injecting arbitrary ‘Host’ header values to poison a web-cache or trigger redirections.
CVE-2020-27575
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-08
Maxum Rumpus 8.2.13 and 8.2.14 is affected by a command injection vulnerability. The web administration contains functionality in which administrators are able to manage users. The edit users form contains a parameter vulnerable to command injection due to insufficient validation.
CVE-2020-27576
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-08
Maxum Rumpus 8.2.13 and 8.2.14 is affected by cross-site scripting (XSS). Users are able to create folders in the web application. The folder name is insufficiently validated resulting in a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability.
CVE-2020-27838
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-08
A flaw was found in keycloak in versions prior to 13.0.0. The client registration endpoint allows fetching information about PUBLIC clients (like client secret) without authentication which could be an issue if the same PUBLIC client changed to CONFIDENTIAL later. The highest threat from this vulner...
CVE-2021-21503
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-08
PowerScale OneFS 8.1.2,8.2.2 and 9.1.0 contains an improper input sanitization issue in a command. The Compadmin user could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to potential privileges escalation.