Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

10/28/2016
05:30 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

And Now A PREDATOR To Fight DNS Domain Abuse

Researchers at Princeton and elsewhere demo a new tool for spotting people registering domains for malicious purposes.

Security researchers at Princeton University, Google, and three other organizations have developed a software tool designed to let domain name registration companies detect and block people attempting to register domains intended for malicious purposes.

The researchers provided details of the new Proactive Recognition and Elimination of Domain Abuse at Time-Of-Registration (PREDATOR) in a technical paper presented at the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security this week.

They described the tool as an evolution of existing domain reputation systems that work by first observing domain use and then assigning a reputation score to it based on type of content hosted and other factors.

The goal with PREDATOR is to equip security professional and domain registrars with the ability to do such reputation scoring before the actual domain registration takes place by observing and evaluating so-called time-of-registration features.

"The intuition has always been that the way that malicious actors use online resources somehow differs fundamentally from the way legitimate actors use them," Nick Feamster, acting director of Princeton’s Center for Information Technology Policy said in a statement announcing PREDATOR.

"We were looking for those signals: what is it about a domain name that makes it automatically identifiable as a bad domain name?"

Early evaluations of the tool using registration logs of .com and .net domains over a five-month period showed it to achieve a 70% detection rate and a false-positive rate of 0.35%, the researchers claimed in the paper. The results suggest the tool offers an effective and early first line of defense against DNS domain misuse, they noted. “It predicts malicious domains when they are registered, which is typically days or weeks earlier than existing DNS blacklists.”

Researchers from the University of California, Santa Barbara, the University of California, Berkeley, Google, the International Computer Science Institute and Princeton University contributed to PREDATOR.

The work on PREDATOR builds on previous research focused on evaluating DNS preregistration data to predict future DNS traffic, says Feamster in comments to Dark Reading. He pointed to a patent that Verisign filed in 2012 as one example of previous work in this area.

The idea is to make it harder for threat actors to register websites for sending spam, for launching phishing and denial-of-service campaigns and other malicious activities. Cybercriminals routinely register thousands of domains on a daily basis for such purposes.

The Anti-Phishing Work Group for instance counted nearly 630,500 sites being used for phishing alone between Q1 and Q3 last year, with the US hosting the most number of such sites.

Others have worked to fight domain name abuse in different ways. Recently, researchers at Georgia Tech for instance demonstrated a method for spotting attackers hiding behind reputable domains or hijacking domains previously associated with malicious uses. Last year, internet pioneer Paul Vixie proposed introducing a short waiting period between when a domain is registered and when it goes live, to deter abuse.

Current blacklisting tools only allow for after-the-fact action. So criminals are able to launch new domains to support their activities almost as quickly as old ones are taken down. “If we can identify in advance that a DNS domain name is going to be used for malicious purposes we could prevent it from being registered,” Feamster says.

People registering domain names with malicious intent often exhibit certain behaviors, he says. For example, someone planning on using domain names in an attack campaign might register hundreds and even thousands of domains over a very small window of time. Similarly, it is not unusual for such domains to have names that are not necessarily human readable or names that are minor variations of a single name, he says.

By detecting such patterns and blocking automatic domain registration until vetting takes place, registrars can make it much harder for malicious actors to abuse DNS domains, Feamster says.

The hope is to be able to make the technology commercially available eventually, he adds.

Related stories:

 

 

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
TimTonne
50%
50%
TimTonne,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/21/2017 | 6:55:30 AM
achja
nnn
bradprat
50%
50%
bradprat,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/14/2017 | 7:52:16 PM
Re: Bollywood story
It is no longer safe
juliazz
50%
50%
juliazz,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/26/2017 | 7:06:34 AM
here
I get a DNs abuse and its not funny at all... Thx for the post
Benefiter
50%
50%
Benefiter,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/2/2016 | 4:55:52 PM
Re: here I got the tips!
It's actually a cool and useful piece of information. I am glad that you shared this helpful information with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thank you for sharing.
tomysong
50%
50%
tomysong,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/2/2016 | 2:16:43 PM
here
I don't even know how I stopped up right here, but I believed this submit used to be good. I do not recognize who you might be however certainly you're going to a famous blogger in the event you aren't already. Cheers!
amiee
50%
50%
amiee,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/1/2016 | 6:45:21 PM
here I got the tips!
Its like you learn my mind! You seem to understand a lot about this, like you wrote the e-book in it or something. I believe that you could do with some percent to pressure the message house a bit, but instead of that, this is great blog. A fantastic read. I'll certainly be back.
jalair105
50%
50%
jalair105,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/31/2016 | 9:31:47 AM
Food for thought
Interesting name for this process. Have any safeguards been thought of before a "Government or Political NGO" decides that the "malicious actors" with an alternative viewpoint should not be on the web.
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
News
Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
Commentary
Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-32089
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** An issue was discovered on Zebra (formerly Motorola Solutions) Fixed RFID Reader FX9500 devices. An unauthenticated attacker can upload arbitrary files to the filesystem that can then be accessed through the web interface. This can lead to information disclosure and c...
CVE-2020-24586
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that received fragments be cleared from memory after (re)connecting to a network. Under the right circumstances, when another device sends fragmented frames encrypted us...
CVE-2020-24587
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that all fragments of a frame are encrypted under the same key. An adversary can abuse this to decrypt selected fragments when another device sends fragmented frames and...
CVE-2020-24588
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that the A-MSDU flag in the plaintext QoS header field is authenticated. Against devices that support receiving non-SSP A-MSDU frames (which is mandatory as part of 802....
CVE-2020-26139
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
An issue was discovered in the kernel in NetBSD 7.1. An Access Point (AP) forwards EAPOL frames to other clients even though the sender has not yet successfully authenticated to the AP. This might be abused in projected Wi-Fi networks to launch denial-of-service attacks against connected clients and...