Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

'Analog Hackers' Overlooked, Undetected

Many enterprises secure electronic access points but fail to see their own front doors as vulnerable

They can pose as copier repairmen, IT consultants, or fire marshals. They can steal a passcard, pick the lock, or simply walk in with a group of employees. They can borrow a password written on a Post-It, make a copy of a key, or simply plug into a network jack in an empty conference room.

They have two things in common: They've been on your network, and you probably never knew it.

"Analog hackers," sometimes called "physical hackers" or "social engineers," are among the industry's most subtly dangerous, yet least known, threats to IT security. At least, we think they are: Despite extensive research, we were unable to find any definitive industry research that shows the extent of the threat, or how fast it might be growing.

"There's a whole community built around it, yet you hardly ever see any real discussion about it anywhere," says Leonard Gallion, a physical security consultant, who also serves as IT manager for a Dallas-based nonprofit organization. "I'm not sure there is any data about it."

That's one of the reasons why physical hacking is so attractive to attackers -- it's potentially highly lucrative, yet frequently overlooked, says Steve Stasiukonis, vice president and founder of Secure Network Technologies, a penetration testing firm that specializes in social engineering and physical security.

"There are three kinds of hackers: the electronic kind that creates problems on the network, usually from another country; the script kiddie, who's just doing it for fun; and the white-collar criminal," says Stasiukonis. "If I was going to make a life as a white-collar criminal, I wouldn't do it electronically. I'd walk in the front door or the back door. It's easier, the money's better, and there's no firewall log to trace you back to." (See Social Engineering, the Shoppers' Way.)

Unlike house burglars, who prefer to work when no one is home, physical hackers usually operate in the middle of the day, taking advantage of slipshod door locks and gullible employees. "We had one job recently where we posed as IT consultants, and one of the staffers actually gave us her username and password, then helped us navigate the system so we could find what we were looking for," Stasiukonis says.

Physical attackers often use social engineering techniques such as impersonation to gain entry into a site, noted Jim Stickley, CTO at penetration testing company TraceSecurity, in a recent conference presentation. Typically, the attackers will work in pairs: one to keep employees engaged and one who finds excuses to wander around the building unescorted, he said.

Some of the common disguises used by physical attackers are IT consultants or technicians; copier, air conditioning, or other repair services; exterminators; or even fire marshals on a supposed safety check, Stickley said.

Gallion, who specializes in doors, locks, and physical entry systems, says that once they're inside, analog hackers can often find their way through locked server room doors, even if those doors are protected by an electronic smart card or token.

"A lockpick doesn't know whether there's an electronic ID system or not," Gallion says. "If the lock is poor, or there is a way to block the door open, you can sometimes get in with just a few office supplies or a credit card." Many companies buy expensive doors and locks but fail to recognize badly-hung doors or access panels in the floors or ceilings that allow attackers to go right over them, he says.

In his presentation, Stickley said that he has found a wealth of sensitive information, including user identities and passwords, by simply dumpster-diving on unshredded company trash. "Shred, shred, shred," he said.

Once inside a corporate building, attackers can usually collect more data or do greater damage than they could via electronic means, experts say. A visit to the data center, for example, could yield non-encrypted backup tapes that contain a whole host of information that might not be available online, Gallion observes. And, if they use lockpicks or other non-damaging methods of entry, an analog hacker might get in and out of a physical location without anyone knowing that a break-in had occurred, he says.

Stasiukonis agrees. "I think one reason you don't hear about it more is that [physical hackers] don't leave a trail, if they do it right," he says. "It happens to some companies and they never find out about it."

So what can companies do about it? There are some technological solutions to the physical hacking problem, such as better doors, surveillance cameras, and alarm systems, Gallion observes. "A lot of analog hackers will be deterred if they know there's video surveillance on the other side of the door," he says. "It's just like in the world of electronic hacking: You can't just put up a firewall and forget it. You need multiple systems if you want to ensure security." (See Separate Physical, Electronic Security.)

But in the end, it is employee training that works best, Stasiukonis says. "Fixing machines is easy," he says. "Fixing people is hard." Employees should be trained to watch for visitors who behave suspiciously and challenge strangers whom they have not seen before.

"Physical security has to be a collective effort, or it won't work," Stasiukonis says. "You can't leave it up to half a dozen guys in IT."

— Tim Wilson, Site Editor, Dark Reading

  • Secure Network Technologies Inc.
  • TraceSecurity Inc.

    Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
    Commentary
    Ransomware Is Not the Problem
    Adam Shostack, Consultant, Entrepreneur, Technologist, Game Designer,  6/9/2021
    Edge-DRsplash-11-edge-ask-the-experts
    How Can I Test the Security of My Home-Office Employees' Routers?
    John Bock, Senior Research Scientist,  6/7/2021
    News
    New Ransomware Group Claiming Connection to REvil Gang Surfaces
    Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  6/10/2021
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon
    Current Issue
    The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
    In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
    Flash Poll
    How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
    How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
    Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2021-20733
    PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
    Improper authorization in handler for custom URL scheme vulnerability in ????????? (asken diet) for Android versions from v.3.0.0 to v.4.2.x allows a remote attacker to lead a user to access an arbitrary website via the vulnerable App.
    CVE-2021-20734
    PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
    Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Welcart e-Commerce versions prior to 2.2.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
    CVE-2021-20735
    PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
    Cross-site scripting vulnerability in ETUNA EC-CUBE plugins (Delivery slip number plugin (3.0 series) 1.0.10 and earlier, Delivery slip number csv bulk registration plugin (3.0 series) 1.0.8 and earlier, and Delivery slip number mail plugin (3.0 series) 1.0.8 and earlier) allows remote attackers to ...
    CVE-2021-20736
    PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
    NoSQL injection vulnerability in GROWI versions prior to v4.2.20 allows a remote attacker to obtain and/or alter the information stored in the database via unspecified vectors.
    CVE-2021-20737
    PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
    Improper authentication vulnerability in GROWI versions prior to v4.2.20 allows a remote attacker to view the unauthorized pages without access privileges via unspecified vectors.