Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

5/22/2019
07:15 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Alphabet's Chronicle Explores Code-Signing Abuse in the Wild

A new analysis highlights the prevalence of malware signed by certificate authorities and the problems with trust-based security.

Researchers with Chronicle, the cybersecurity company and Alphabet subsidiary, today published an analysis of its investigation into the trend of signed malware being exploited in the wild.

The process of cryptographically signing code was created to give the Windows operating system a means to distinguish good code from bad. Certificates are signed/issued by trusted certificate authorities (CAs), backed by a trusted parent CA. The purpose behind signing a Windows executable file was to mark the authenticity of code published on the Internet.

The problem is, this system is based on trust, and cybercriminals are taking advantage of it.

Malware authors buy these certificates, directly or through resellers. While a CA can revoke a certificate deemed untrustworthy — and more of them are — this remains the only way to cut down on abuse. The process creates a window during which malware has a trusted certificate.

To highlight the prevalence of this trend and problems with trust-based security, Chronicle researchers used VirusTotal, an online virus/malware scanner that analyzes suspicious files that a machine's antivirus tools may have missed. They limited this project to Windows PE Executable files, filtered out samples with fewer than 15 aggregate detections, and "aggressively" filtered out grayware files to determine the number of malware samples each CA was responsible for signing. When all was said and filtered, the researchers ended up with a total of 3,815 malware samples.

CAs that signed certificates of 100+ malware samples accounted for nearly 78% of signed malware uploaded to VirusTotal, Chronicle reports. Interestingly, there is a significant drop between CAs when considering malware samples signed. For example, COMODO RSA Code Signing CA, which has the most samples at 1,775, has almost 3.5 times the amount of Thawte SHA256 Code Signing CA, which has the next-highest number, at 509 signed malware samples. The numbers continue to fall from there: Thawte SHA256 has double the next-highest CA.

Researchers report CAs are combating the trend. More than 20% of malware samples had their certificates revoked at the time Chronicle's blog post published, a sign CAs are cracking down.

As Chronicle points out, attackers taking advantage of user trust is nothing new; however, it was believed to mostly be popular among nation-state attackers. Now, it appears the trend has grown to become a common practice among most cybercriminals armed with malware.

"The impact is amplified by the scope and scale of typical crimeware campaigns," the company reports. "Expect to see signed malware reported more frequently."

Related Content:

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 5/28/2020
Stay-at-Home Orders Coincide With Massive DNS Surge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/27/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Can you smell me now?
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11844
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
There is an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Micro Focus Service Management Automation (SMA) product affecting version 2018.05 to 2020.02. The vulnerability could be exploited to provide unauthorized access to the Container Deployment Foundation.
CVE-2020-6937
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
A Denial of Service vulnerability in MuleSoft Mule CE/EE 3.8.x, 3.9.x, and 4.x released before April 7, 2020, could allow remote attackers to submit data which can lead to resource exhaustion.
CVE-2020-7648
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.72.2 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads for users who have access to Snyk's internal network by appending the URL with a fragment identifier and a whitelisted path e.g. `#package.json`
CVE-2020-7650
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker after 4.72.0 including and before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads to users with access to Snyk's internal network of any files ending in the following extensions: yaml, yml or json.
CVE-2020-7654
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Information Exposure. It logs private keys if logging level is set to DEBUG.