Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

9/1/2016
12:58 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Air-Gapped Systems Foiled Again, Via USB Drive

Researchers at Israel's Ben-Gurion University have come up with another novel way to extract data from air-gapped systems, at least theoretically.

Conventional wisdom has it that one of the best ways to protect a sensitive system from external attack is to air-gap it, or to physically and logically separate the system from the Internet and other computers.

The technique is very effective, but not foolproof, as researchers from Israel’s Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (BGU) showed yet again this week with a proof-of-concept exploit for extracting data from air-gapped systems via radio frequency transmissions.

This is at least the third similar exploit that BGU researchers have developed in recent years involving data theft from isolated systems. Last year, they showed how attackers could establish a covert bi-directional communication channel between two air-gapped computers by leveraging the integrated thermal sensors in the systems.

In 2014, they demonstrated a technique for getting an air-gapped computer to transmit sensitive data via radio signals to a nearby smartphone equipped with special software dubbed AirHopper.

The latest proof-of-concept too involves the use of controlled RF signals, but with a twist. In this case, the researchers have developed software dubbed USBee that is designed to generate RF electromagnetic emissions from a system’s USB data bus. In a technical paper, the researchers discuss how the RF signals can be modulated with arbitrary binary data, like passwords and encryption keys, and then sent to a nearby computer using a plugged-in USB drive as the transmitter.

The attack builds on previous research that shows how data can be extracted from an air-gapped computer using USB connectors with embedded RF transmitters in them, the researchers said in their paper. As one example, they pointed to an USB hardware implant dubbed COTTONMOUTH, developed by the National Security Agency for extracting data from disconnected systems.

Unlike the previously described methods however, USBee does not require any hardware modification. An ordinary unmodified USB stick that is plugged into a system running the USBee code, can be used as a transmitter to send data to a nearby computer at a rate of about 80 bytes per second. Tests have shown that a computer equipped with an RF antenna will be able to capture the signals from up to 30 feet away, the researchers said.

Significant as that is, the actual risk of attackers being able to leverage the method to steal data from air-gapped systems remains small. By far the biggest reason is that in order for the attack to work, the air-gapped system has to be infected with the USBee code first, which means having physical access to the system. Systems that are sensitive enough to be air-gapped are also unlikely to permit the use of USB drives on them, especially after the Stuxnet attacks of 2010, which were enabled via infected USB sticks.

“The whole chain-of-attack requires a motivated attacker with high skills,” says Mordechai Guri, head of R&D of the cybersecurity center at BGU and the lead author of the technical paper. “Developing the USBee malware itself is not the hardest part. Infecting the victim with [the] malware and then intercepting the transmitted data is the more challenging part in this attack,” he admits.

There are several well-documented examples of how isolated systems can be infected with malware like USBee, he says. But often, even after that, it is hard to download data from such systems without being noticed. The USBee exploit shows one way of how that can be accomplished without raising any red flags.

Assuming that an attacker is able to infect an air-gapped system with USBee, the data that can be stolen this way is significant. Guri pointed to examples like encryption keys, keyloggings, personal records, small files, usernames, and passwords.

One of the most effective countermeasures for dealing with a threat like this is to define areas around air-gapped systems where RF receivers are prohibited, the researchers said. Partition walls with proper insulation can also help to lower signal reception distance, they said.

Cris Thomas, strategist at Tenable Network Security, said that while there’s a chance that a high-level nation state actor might employ a tactic such as the one described by the BGU researchers, there are few real-world scenarios where such an attack would be useful.

“However, the fact that this technology exists, even in the lab, does mean that people who are in control of air-gapped systems need to make sure that the physical security controlling access to those systems is adequate,” he said.

Related stories:

 

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
97% of Americans Can't Ace a Basic Security Test
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  5/20/2019
How Security Vendors Can Address the Cybersecurity Talent Shortage
Rob Rashotte, VP of Global Training and Technical Field Enablement at Fortinet,  5/24/2019
TeamViewer Admits Breach from 2016
Dark Reading Staff 5/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-7068
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7069
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7070
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7071
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure.
CVE-2019-7072
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .