Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

11/9/2015
02:15 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

6 Critical SAP HANA Vulns Can't Be Fixed With Patches

Onapsis releases 21 SAP HANA security advisories, including some Trexnet vulnerabilities that require upgrades and reconfigurations.

Researchers at Onapsis today released an unprecedented 21 security advisories for all SAP HANA-based applications, including eight critical vulnerabilities, six of which cannot be fixed by simple patches.

Collectively, the critical vulnerabilities can be exploited remotely and enable attackers to execute code, move files, delete data, completely compromise the system, access and manage business-relevant data and processes, and render all SAP systems unavailable.

SAP HANA is the in-memory processing technology that powers some of the biggest big-data analytics projects, as well as SAP's other business products, including customer relationship management (CRM), enterprise resource planning (ERP), and product lifecycle management (PLM) systems.

Onapsis CTO Juan Pablo Perez-Etchegoyen says most enterprises are "not just running one SAP product. Typically, they're running the whole suite. ... What happens if one of these systems goes down, when you have so many processes going to this system?"

The impact of an SAP outage or compromise will vary by company and by what SAP applications they use, says Etchegoyen, but one Onapsis customer told him last year that a SAP outage could cost its company $22 million per minute.

Six of the critical vulnerabilities of gravest concern are due to a configuration problem, and therefore cannot be fixed just by patching, he says. They affect the TREXnet protocol, used by the HANA Database's TREX servers -- NameServer, Preprocessor, IndexServer, StatisticsServer, WebDispatcher, XSEngine, or CompileServer -- to communicate with one another. If the TREXnet communication is not secured with authentication, attackers can exploit a variety of vulnerabilities by sending specially crafted packets to these TREX server ports. Those vulnerabilities are:

  • Trexnet remote file write -- override relevant info and render system unavailable due to corrupted data
  • Trexnet remote directory deletion -- delete info and render system unavailable
  • Trexnet remote file deletion -- delete data, affect integrity, and potentially render system unavailable
  • Trexnet file move -- relocate info stored in system so it's easy to access; it could also potentially render the system unavailable due to a non-integral file system
  • Trexnet remote command execution -- completely compromise the system and would be able to access and manage any business-relevant information or processes, execute commands with admin privileges
  • Trexnet remote Python execution -- completely compromise the system and would be able to access and manage any business-relevant information or processes; executing arbitrary Python modules in SAP HANA with admin privileges

To close those holes, users need to upgrade to the latest version of the software and reconfigure their settings to enable strong authentication and encryption measures on TREXnet.

There are another two critical vulnerabilities in the HANA Database due to incorrect calculation of buffer size:

  • HTTP remote code execution. By sending specially crafted HTTP packets to SAP HANA XSServer, a remote, unauthenticated attacker could completely compromise the system, access and manage business-relevant information and processes. This could be achieved remotely and potentially through the Internet, affecting on-premise and cloud-based HANA solutions.
  • SQL remote code execution. By sending specially crafted packets to SQL interfaces, attackers could compromise the platform, executing arbitrary code or performing a denial of service attack, completely compromise system, access and manage business-relevant information and processes.

In addition to the critical ones, Onapsis' release also contains six high-severity and seven medium-severity vulnerabilities.

Exacerbating the problem is the fact that while many of businesses' core processes run on SAP systems, information security teams have very little visibility into these systems and how they're secured, according to Etchegoyen. 

"We still have these two teams separated," says Etchegoyen. "That's something we're trying to evangelize. They need to have more communication between those two teams."

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
SanjayK204
50%
50%
SanjayK204,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/31/2018 | 2:32:44 AM
appreciate
H,

 

Thanks for the tip, appreciate it. Your article definitely helped me to understand the core concepts.
I'm most excited about the details your article touch based! I assume it doesn't come out of the box, it sounds like you are saying we'd need to write in the handlers ourselves.
Is there any other articles you would recommend to understand this better?

 

In the HANA migration guide, it is stated to run some consistency checks in FICO (see verbiage below).

I have run these, but I really don't know what I'm looking for - are we running just to make sure they run, running to validate numbers on the reports? Thoughts & guidance are appreciated. Thank you!

3.8 FI/CO: Performing Additional Consistency Checks

To ensure that the source system is consistent, user of Financial Accounting (FI) and Controlling (CO) need to perform some preparatory activities, among others additional consistency checks.

3.2 Product-Specific Preparations of the System Copy Guide, which is mentioned in Further Documentation [page 6].Caution Make sure that no customer data is changed in the meantime. Proceed as follows:

Procedure

1. FI: Run job SAPF190 to perform an additional consistency check. Choose AccountingFinancial AccountingGeneral ledgerPeriodic ProcessingClosingCheck/count. Then choose for○ classic FI: Reconciliation○ new general ledger: Reconciliation (New)

2. FI: You can further check consistency by running the jobs listed below:

○ RFUMSV00 (tax on sales/purchases)

○ RAGITT01 (asset history sheet)

○ RAZUGA01 (asset acquisitions)

○ RAABGA01 (fixed asset retirements)

3. CO: Run the report group 1SIP

 




Appreciate your effort for making such useful blogs and helping the community.  

 

Thanks a heaps,

Irene Hynes

 
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-6852
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
A CWE-200: Information Exposure vulnerability exists in Modicon Controllers (M340 CPUs, M340 communication modules, Premium CPUs, Premium communication modules, Quantum CPUs, Quantum communication modules - see security notification for specific versions), which could cause the disclosure of FTP har...
CVE-2019-6853
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
A CWE-79: Failure to Preserve Web Page Structure vulnerability exists in Andover Continuum (models 9680, 5740 and 5720, bCX4040, bCX9640, 9900, 9940, 9924 and 9702) , which could enable a successful Cross-site Scripting (XSS attack) when using the products web server.
CVE-2013-2092
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in Dolibarr ERP/CRM 3.3.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML in functions.lib.php.
CVE-2013-2093
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
Dolibarr ERP/CRM 3.3.1 does not properly validate user input in viewimage.php and barcode.lib.php which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands.
CVE-2015-3166
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
The snprintf implementation in PostgreSQL before 9.0.20, 9.1.x before 9.1.16, 9.2.x before 9.2.11, 9.3.x before 9.3.7, and 9.4.x before 9.4.2 does not properly handle system-call errors, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive information or have other unspecified impact via unknown vectors, as d...