Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

2/7/2019
01:30 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Security Bugs in Video Chat Tools Enable Remote Attackers

Lifesize is issuing a hotfix to address vulnerabilities in its enterprise collaboration devices, which could give hackers a gateway into target organizations.

Newly discovered security bugs in Lifesize videoconferencing products can be remotely exploited, giving attackers the ability to spy on a target organization or attack other devices.

Trustwave SpiderLabs security researcher Simon Kenin found the remote OS command injection vulnerabilities, which affect Lifesize Team, Lifesize Room, Lifesize Passport, and Lifesize Networker. Lifesize has a range of major clients – eBay, PayPal, and Netflix among them.

Exploitation of these flaws can give adversaries access to the products' firmware. Kenin called the bug "trivial," but it requires some hard-to-get information: Remote hackers will need the firmware code for their target devices, which can only be downloaded from the Lifesize website with a valid serial number for the specific product in mind. But firmware code isn't necessary for attackers with physical device access, says Trustwave threat intelligence manager Karl Sigler.

These bugs affect the Lifesize support page, where users can troubleshoot issues and send log files for their devices. Attackers must log in to the support interface, which often isn't difficult because many owners fail to change the default credentials that ship with Lifesize products.

"The vulnerability itself is in how they implement PHP in the Web interface to the devices," Sigler explains in an interview with Dark Reading. "Unfortunately, the PHP code is pretty poor in how it's implemented ... you can basically execute any command you want on the device using that interface."

It's a "classic programming error," Kenin wrote in a blog post on the findings. User input is passed without any sanitization to the PHP shell_exec function, which executes system commands as the Web server user. With no limit on the type of code that can be passed, attackers who know how to pass arguments to a PHP page can launch any commands they want.

With this vulnerability alone, intruders could gain a foothold on the network and execute commands on the target device to probe other machines on the network. But they also could achieve full persistence on the device with an unpatched privilege escalation bug, which was discovered in 2016 and affects the same pool of devices, Sigler says. The duo would give someone full control of the appliance, access to media, as well as access to other devices.

A Patch is En Route
Trustwave contacted Lifesize in November to begin the disclosure process, did not receive a response, and then re-established contact last month. Lifesize initially said it would not be releasing a patch because the affected devices were legacy and had end-of-life and end-of-sale dates.

It has since changed its position and will be offering a patch. In the meantime, customers using Lifesize 220 systems should contact support for a hotfix. There is no evidence the bugs have been exploited in the wild, says Sigler, and Trustwave promptly reached out to Lifesize so it could create a patch before someone takes advantage of the flaw.

"If we can find it, criminals can, too," he notes.

For companies that decide to abandon support for their legacy systems, Sigler urges making customers aware at least one year ahead of time so they can pursue upgrade or replacement options. They should also make upgrade options available so users understand the risk they're taking on by continuing to use legacy products. 

Trustwave is holding off on its release of the proof-of-concept for these vulnerabilities so users can apply the hotfix. Researcher plan to publish the PoC on Feb. 21, 2019. "At that time, we will release the PoC code to provide users, administrators, and network security professionals with the technical details and tools to validate whether they are still vulnerable," Sigler says.

Related Content:

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop agenda here.

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15208
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
CVE-2020-15209
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
CVE-2020-15210
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
CVE-2020-15211
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
CVE-2020-15212
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...