Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

News & Commentary

9/4/2019
02:07 PM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
50%
50%

TrickBot Has Evolved to Become More Dangerous

TrickBot has been an active botnet since around October of 2016. It's well known as part of the threat landscape, and has been operated in the past by GOLD BLACKBURN.

TrickBot has been an active botnet since around October 2016. It's well known as part of the threat landscape, and has been operated in the past by GOLD BLACKBURN.

The trick to it is that it can manipulate web sessions by intercepting network traffic before it is rendered by a victim's browser. It fools you.

Secureworks, Inc. has found new activity by TrickBot that leaves mobile users in the US open to a new form of attack. They found that TrickBot is injecting code with different optimizations.

In their blog post about it, they say that, "In August 2019, the dynamic webinjects used by TrickBot were augmented to include the following US-based mobile carriers:

August 5: Verizon Wireless
August 12: T-Mobile
August 19: Sprint."

OK, TrickBot jumped on the three carriers. But what did it do to them? Secureworks saw that the injected code (that happened when the web sites of the above carriers were visited) caused an additional form field to be created which requests the user's account PIN code.

They note in the post that, "the legitimate server response is intercepted by TrickBot and proxied through a command and control (C2) server. This C2 server injects additional HTML and JavaScript into the page, which is then rendered in the victim's web browser." That's where the field for the PIN comes from.

The bot knows what to do with the PIN it snarfs too. TrickBot's record (rcrd) functionality is invoked at this point to create an additional HTTP request that contains the victim's username, password, and PIN. The request is transmitted to the TrickBot C2 server. These "recordings" are presented to TrickBot operators as they browse through infected hosts in their web panel.

Securework's take on this is that it "suggests an interest in perpetrating port-out or SIM swap fraud. This fraud allows an attacker to assume control of a victim's telephone number, including all inbound and outbound text and voice communications. The interception of short message service (SMS)-based authentication tokens or password resets is frequently used during account takeover (ATO) fraud."

The researchers also recommend that organizations use time-based one-time password (TOTP) multi-factor authentication (MFA) rather than SMS MFA when feasible. SMS MFA was the method the Social Security Administration had to scrap about a year ago because, as can be seen by the last paragraph and some advisories from CERT, it's easy to fraud.

Similarly, telephone numbers should not be used as password reset options on important accounts.

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
News
Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
Commentary
Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-16632
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
A XSS Vulnerability in /uploads/dede/action_search.php in DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 allows an authenticated user to execute remote arbitrary code via the keyword parameter.
CVE-2021-32073
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows a remote attacker to send a malicious request to to the web manager allowing remote code execution.
CVE-2021-33033
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
The Linux kernel before 5.11.14 has a use-after-free in cipso_v4_genopt in net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c because the CIPSO and CALIPSO refcounting for the DOI definitions is mishandled, aka CID-ad5d07f4a9cd. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
CVE-2021-33034
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
In the Linux kernel before 5.12.4, net/bluetooth/hci_event.c has a use-after-free when destroying an hci_chan, aka CID-5c4c8c954409. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
CVE-2019-25044
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
The block subsystem in the Linux kernel before 5.2 has a use-after-free that can lead to arbitrary code execution in the kernel context and privilege escalation, aka CID-c3e2219216c9. This is related to blk_mq_free_rqs and blk_cleanup_queue.