Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

News & Commentary

// // //
9/4/2019
02:07 PM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb

TrickBot Has Evolved to Become More Dangerous

TrickBot has been an active botnet since around October of 2016. It's well known as part of the threat landscape, and has been operated in the past by GOLD BLACKBURN.

TrickBot has been an active botnet since around October 2016. It's well known as part of the threat landscape, and has been operated in the past by GOLD BLACKBURN.

The trick to it is that it can manipulate web sessions by intercepting network traffic before it is rendered by a victim's browser. It fools you.

Secureworks, Inc. has found new activity by TrickBot that leaves mobile users in the US open to a new form of attack. They found that TrickBot is injecting code with different optimizations.

In their blog post about it, they say that, "In August 2019, the dynamic webinjects used by TrickBot were augmented to include the following US-based mobile carriers:

August 5: Verizon Wireless
August 12: T-Mobile
August 19: Sprint."

OK, TrickBot jumped on the three carriers. But what did it do to them? Secureworks saw that the injected code (that happened when the web sites of the above carriers were visited) caused an additional form field to be created which requests the user's account PIN code.

They note in the post that, "the legitimate server response is intercepted by TrickBot and proxied through a command and control (C2) server. This C2 server injects additional HTML and JavaScript into the page, which is then rendered in the victim's web browser." That's where the field for the PIN comes from.

The bot knows what to do with the PIN it snarfs too. TrickBot's record (rcrd) functionality is invoked at this point to create an additional HTTP request that contains the victim's username, password, and PIN. The request is transmitted to the TrickBot C2 server. These "recordings" are presented to TrickBot operators as they browse through infected hosts in their web panel.

Securework's take on this is that it "suggests an interest in perpetrating port-out or SIM swap fraud. This fraud allows an attacker to assume control of a victim's telephone number, including all inbound and outbound text and voice communications. The interception of short message service (SMS)-based authentication tokens or password resets is frequently used during account takeover (ATO) fraud."

The researchers also recommend that organizations use time-based one-time password (TOTP) multi-factor authentication (MFA) rather than SMS MFA when feasible. SMS MFA was the method the Social Security Administration had to scrap about a year ago because, as can be seen by the last paragraph and some advisories from CERT, it's easy to fraud.

Similarly, telephone numbers should not be used as password reset options on important accounts.

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Black Hat USA 2022 Attendee Report
Black Hat attendees are not sleeping well. Between concerns about attacks against cloud services, ransomware, and the growing risks to the global supply chain, these security pros have a lot to be worried about. Read our 2022 report to hear what they're concerned about now.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-35670
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-11
Adobe Acrobat Reader versions 22.001.20169 (and earlier), 20.005.30362 (and earlier) and 17.012.30249 (and earlier) are affected by a Use After Free vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass mitigations such as ASLR. Expl...
CVE-2022-35671
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-11
Adobe Acrobat Reader versions 22.001.20169 (and earlier), 20.005.30362 (and earlier) and 17.012.30249 (and earlier) are affected by an out-of-bounds read vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass mitigations such as ASLR....
CVE-2022-35673
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-11
Adobe FrameMaker versions 2019 Update 8 (and earlier) and 2020 Update 4 (and earlier) are affected by an out-of-bounds read vulnerability when parsing a crafted file, which could result in a read past the end of an allocated memory structure. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to execute ...
CVE-2022-35674
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-11
Adobe FrameMaker versions 2019 Update 8 (and earlier) and 2020 Update 4 (and earlier) are affected by an out-of-bounds read vulnerability when parsing a crafted file, which could result in a read past the end of an allocated memory structure. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to execute ...
CVE-2022-35675
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-11
Adobe FrameMaker versions 2019 Update 8 (and earlier) and 2020 Update 4 (and earlier) are affected by a Use After Free vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a mal...