Threat Intelligence

9/18/2018
02:55 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail

Websites Attack Attempts Rose in Q2

New data shows hackers hit websites, on average, every 25 minutes.



New data shows attackers are trying to sneak past malware scanners on websites using stealthy hacks such as cryptojacking and malicious JavaScript.

Website security service provider SiteLock analyzed data from 6 million customer websites for the second quarter of 2018 and found that a website, on average, suffers 58 attack attempts per day – or one every 25 minutes – an increase of 16% since the first quarter of this year. That jump comes after a dip in attack attempts from the fourth quarter of 2017 (63 attempts each day) to Q1 of this year (50 per day).

Why the temporary dip? "Malware detection tools are getting better," says Jessica Ortega, a researcher with SiteLock. "Attackers had to step back and hone their skills a bit to find new and sneakier ways to get into websites."

The latest methods of choice are cryptojacking and JavaScript-based attacks, the data shows. Cryptojacking attacks doubled from Q1, while malicious JavaScript files rose 16%. The two go hand in hand, as well, SiteLock said in its report. "This new trend is not surprising because many cryptojacking scripts use JavaScript kits to deploy and collect the mined cryptocurrency. Because cryptojacking and JavaScript are often symptomless to the website owner, they are becoming a new favorite weapon of cybercriminals," the report said.

The two attacks are also leading the way so far in Q3, according to SiteLock's Ortega. "They're going to continue to grow," she says.

But that doesn't mean old-school website attack methods are fading away. "The old standbys – SEO and backdoor files – are not going anywhere. Nearly half of infected sites have one backdoor file on them," she says. "That's easy to deploy."

Some 1% of websites in Q2 were infected with malware, with the average infection requiring cleanup of 178 files – a decline of 28% from Q1 and 91% from Q2 2017.

According to SiteLock, 9% of websites had at least one vulnerability of either cross-site scripting (XSS), cross-site request forgery (CSRF), or SQL injection. That was a 3% increase over Q1. "Those represent the three most common vulns. It's totally possible that the sites have other types of vulns" as well, Ortega notes.

Social Malware
Websites that connect to one social media platform are two times more likely to be infected with malware, according to the study, and sites connected to three or more platforms are three times more likely to get infected.

"We know a lot of sites use plug-ins to connect to social media," Ortega says, and that often leaves websites vulnerable to social media-borne attacks and data stealing. SiteLock recommends performing due diligence before installing any social media or other plug-ins, confirming that they provide regular security updates and patches and study reviews of the apps.

And gone are the days when small website owners can rely on search engine providers alone to alert them and visitors of an infection on their sites. "Of 19.2 million infected sites, only 3 million got flagged by search engines," she says.

SiteLock recommends updating Web apps regularly, and deploying malware scanning and Web application firewalls.

Related Content:

Black Hat Europe returns to London Dec 3-6 2018  with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
'PowerSnitch' Hacks Androids via Power Banks
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/8/2018
The Case for a Human Security Officer
Ira Winkler, CISSP, President, Secure Mentem,  12/5/2018
Windows 10 Security Questions Prove Easy for Attackers to Exploit
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  12/5/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
10 Best Practices That Could Reshape Your IT Security Department
This Dark Reading Tech Digest, explores ten best practices that could reshape IT security departments.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-8651
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-12
A cross site scripting vulnerability exists when Microsoft Dynamics NAV does not properly sanitize a specially crafted web request to an affected Dynamics NAV server, aka "Microsoft Dynamics NAV Cross Site Scripting Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Dynamics NAV.
CVE-2018-8652
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-12
A Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists when Windows Azure Pack does not properly sanitize user-provided input, aka "Windows Azure Pack Cross Site Scripting Vulnerability." This affects Windows Azure Pack Rollup 13.1.
CVE-2018-8617
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-12
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8583, CVE-2018-8...
CVE-2018-8618
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-12
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8583, CVE-2018-8...
CVE-2018-8619
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-12
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Internet Explorer VBScript execution policy does not properly restrict VBScript under specific conditions, aka "Internet Explorer Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This affects Internet Explorer 9, Internet Explorer 11, Internet Exp...