Threat Intelligence

9/18/2018
02:55 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Websites Attack Attempts Rose in Q2

New data shows hackers hit websites, on average, every 25 minutes.

New data shows attackers are trying to sneak past malware scanners on websites using stealthy hacks such as cryptojacking and malicious JavaScript.

Website security service provider SiteLock analyzed data from 6 million customer websites for the second quarter of 2018 and found that a website, on average, suffers 58 attack attempts per day – or one every 25 minutes – an increase of 16% since the first quarter of this year. That jump comes after a dip in attack attempts from the fourth quarter of 2017 (63 attempts each day) to Q1 of this year (50 per day).

Why the temporary dip? "Malware detection tools are getting better," says Jessica Ortega, a researcher with SiteLock. "Attackers had to step back and hone their skills a bit to find new and sneakier ways to get into websites."

The latest methods of choice are cryptojacking and JavaScript-based attacks, the data shows. Cryptojacking attacks doubled from Q1, while malicious JavaScript files rose 16%. The two go hand in hand, as well, SiteLock said in its report. "This new trend is not surprising because many cryptojacking scripts use JavaScript kits to deploy and collect the mined cryptocurrency. Because cryptojacking and JavaScript are often symptomless to the website owner, they are becoming a new favorite weapon of cybercriminals," the report said.

The two attacks are also leading the way so far in Q3, according to SiteLock's Ortega. "They're going to continue to grow," she says.

But that doesn't mean old-school website attack methods are fading away. "The old standbys – SEO and backdoor files – are not going anywhere. Nearly half of infected sites have one backdoor file on them," she says. "That's easy to deploy."

Some 1% of websites in Q2 were infected with malware, with the average infection requiring cleanup of 178 files – a decline of 28% from Q1 and 91% from Q2 2017.

According to SiteLock, 9% of websites had at least one vulnerability of either cross-site scripting (XSS), cross-site request forgery (CSRF), or SQL injection. That was a 3% increase over Q1. "Those represent the three most common vulns. It's totally possible that the sites have other types of vulns" as well, Ortega notes.

Social Malware
Websites that connect to one social media platform are two times more likely to be infected with malware, according to the study, and sites connected to three or more platforms are three times more likely to get infected.

"We know a lot of sites use plug-ins to connect to social media," Ortega says, and that often leaves websites vulnerable to social media-borne attacks and data stealing. SiteLock recommends performing due diligence before installing any social media or other plug-ins, confirming that they provide regular security updates and patches and study reviews of the apps.

And gone are the days when small website owners can rely on search engine providers alone to alert them and visitors of an infection on their sites. "Of 19.2 million infected sites, only 3 million got flagged by search engines," she says.

SiteLock recommends updating Web apps regularly, and deploying malware scanning and Web application firewalls.

Related Content:

Black Hat Europe returns to London Dec 3-6 2018  with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Crowdsourced vs. Traditional Pen Testing
Alex Haynes, Chief Information Security Officer, CDL,  3/19/2019
New Mirai Version Targets Business IoT Devices
Dark Reading Staff 3/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Reading Schneier's Friday Squid Blog again?
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
Organizations are responding to new threats with new processes for detecting and mitigating them. Here's a look at how the discipline of incident response is evolving.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-6149
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-18
An unquoted search path vulnerability was identified in Lenovo Dynamic Power Reduction Utility prior to version 2.2.2.0 that could allow a malicious user with local access to execute code with administrative privileges.
CVE-2018-15509
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-18
Five9 Agent Desktop Plus 10.0.70 has Incorrect Access Control (issue 2 of 2).
CVE-2018-20806
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-17
Phamm (aka PHP LDAP Virtual Hosting Manager) 0.6.8 allows XSS via the login page (the /public/main.php action parameter).
CVE-2019-5616
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-15
CircuitWerkes Sicon-8, a hardware device used for managing electrical devices, ships with a web-based front-end controller and implements an authentication mechanism in JavaScript that is run in the context of a user's web browser.
CVE-2018-17882
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-15
An Integer overflow vulnerability exists in the batchTransfer function of a smart contract implementation for CryptoBotsBattle (CBTB), an Ethereum token. This vulnerability could be used by an attacker to create an arbitrary amount of tokens for any user.