Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

2/22/2019
10:30 AM
Brandon Levene
Brandon Levene
Commentary
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

To Mitigate Advanced Threats, Put People Ahead of Tech

Preventative technologies are only part of the picture and often come at the expense of the humans behind them.

Companies spend millions on security technology designed to prevent cyberattacks, yet they are still plagued by costly breaches and network intrusions.

Indeed, the number of attacks are on the rise, taking longer to address than ever before. It's estimated that the average cost of a data breach in 2018 was up 6.4% over the previous year to $3.86 million. This is why companies cannot afford to simply rely on preventative technologies, which often lull them into a false sense of security.

Such a heightened focus on prevention also comes at the sacrifice of the security team. This is why CISOs should invest in hiring people who can provide the critical thinking that technology can't.

People First, Tech Second
Security teams understand they need to think like hackers. And they understand that it's not computers attacking their companies. Rather, it's the people behind them — people with real-life experience and intuition.

But that doesn't necessarily hold true elsewhere in the organization. One place I often see an over-reliance on technology versus human expertise is among the data science team. It's common for a data science team to operate in a vacuum, without security expertise. For example, static meta data is frequently used to efficiently find and retrieve data. Data scientists may try to cluster malware based on import hashes without taking into account that they are representative of a layer of anti-analysis protection, rather than the malware itself. Working on a faulty premise without the right expertise will garner flawed results.

It pays to invest in talent, too. A recent study from Kaspersky Lab revealed that large companies that rely on external security resources pay up to three times more to recover from a cyberattack than businesses with in-house expertise. Teams without enough people also become overwhelmed more easily. This can lead to general apathy and even burnout.

After all, protecting an organization is a stressful job. So it's imperative that security teams have enough human resources to support the company’s security strategy and keep their organizations safe from attack.

When Prevention Fails, Visibility Is Key
Let's say you have the resources in place. Now let's talk about network visibility. In a survey I conducted last year in a private social media group for security pros, 67% of the 87 security analysts, researchers, and leaders said they did not have enough visibility into their organizations' technical assets in order to identify potential compromises. Being able to see a real-time view of what's happening in the network, verify an attack is happening, gather evidence, and actively investigate is of paramount importance to a holistic security strategy.

For example, a security team might see an exfiltration attempt but may be unable to detect the hacker's attempt to log back into the system. Visibility ensures they can see what is happening in the network, on the endpoints, and in between the endpoints. It also allows teams to triage and investigate new and unusual occurrences. Relying on alerts that say "this was blocked" without a way to see what may not have been blocked leaves an organization with blind spots.

To ensure visibility, enterprises can take the following steps:

  1. Enable logging and store logs in a consumable way.
  2. Understand where to have visibility and how best to take advantage of it.
  3. Know what data the devices on your network can provide so that you can understand what you can see and know where you’re exposed.
  4. Once you have identified the data you have access to, store it for as long as you can.

The key to mitigating advanced threats is a combination of visibility and speed, which ultimately comes down to investing in security experts. This can take many forms, including cultivating expertise from within. While there are seemingly endless opportunities for experienced personnel, consider upskilling entry-level team members, too, so as to create a pipeline of talent that will rise to the top.

If companies prioritize investing in humans first, then focus on visibility, detection, and prevention (in that order), they will be well-equipped for a successful security strategy.  

Related Content:

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop agenda here.

Brandon Levene leads Applied Intelligence for Chronicle (VirusTotal). Prior to Chronicle, he was a founding member of threat organizations at Salesforce.com and Palo Alto Networks. View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RDP Bug Takes New Approach to Host Compromise
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/18/2019
The Problem with Proprietary Testing: NSS Labs vs. CrowdStrike
Brian Monkman, Executive Director at NetSecOPEN,  7/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-12162
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-23
Upwork Time Tracker 5.2.2.716 doesn't verify the SHA256 hash of the downloaded program update before running it, which could lead to code execution or local privilege escalation by replacing the original update.exe.
CVE-2018-18669
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-23
GNUBOARD5 5.3.1.9 has XSS that allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the "board title contents" parameter, aka the adm/board_form_update.php bo_subject parameter.
CVE-2019-10101
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-23
Jsish 2.4.84 2.0484 is affected by: Reachable Assertion. The impact is: denial of service. The component is: function Jsi_ValueArrayIndex (jsiValue.c:366). The attack vector is: executing crafted javascript code. The fixed version is: after commit 738ead193aff380a7e3d7ffb8e11e446f76867f3.
CVE-2019-9815
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-23
If hyperthreading is not disabled, a timing attack vulnerability exists, similar to previous Spectre attacks. Apple has shipped macOS 10.14.5 with an option to disable hyperthreading in applications running untrusted code in a thread through a new sysctl. Firefox now makes use of it on the main thre...
CVE-2019-9816
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-23
A possible vulnerability exists where type confusion can occur when manipulating JavaScript objects in object groups, allowing for the bypassing of security checks within these groups. *Note: this vulnerability has only been demonstrated with UnboxedObjects, which are disabled by default on all supp...