Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

1/9/2017
11:00 AM
Eyal Benishti
Eyal Benishti
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

The Limitations Of Phishing Education

Human nature means that education will only go so far. Technology needs to take up the slack.

In the past 12 months, millions of organizations, spanning all industries and sizes, became targets of cyberattacks. According to a recent report, 400,000 phishing sites were detected per month in 2016, and the Anti-Phishing Working Group concluded that phishing attacks reached an "all-time high" in the second quarter. Not only are attacks proliferating, but the perpetrators have evolved into professional cybercriminals with plenty of time and resources. For these reasons, it's unrealistic to entrust the workforce with the massive responsibility of stopping phishing.

While this many sound ironic coming from someone involved in phishing mitigation, I recognize that phishing education has proved beneficial only to a certain extent. The reality is that the imperfection of humans makes it all but impossible for us to teach everyone how to spot and avoid phishing — and if phishing efforts aren't detected and eliminated fast enough, someone eventually will click, and then it's game over.

When it comes to employee expectations, the digital-native millennial generation, now the largest workforce demographic, is perhaps the most careless when it comes to cybersecurity, opting for expedience over security. Other workforce demographics, such as Generation X and baby boomers, are forced to learn new "detective" skills for identifying and reporting suspicious emails, despite being unfamiliar with technically advanced processes.

Frankly, it's very hard to change behavior. In fact, it's proven that users, regardless of training and awareness, will still click on phishing links or download attachments because of a variety of factors, including curiosity, greediness, distraction, well-crafted impersonations, and/or simply failing to learn from past mistakes. For example:

  • A culture of distraction: People are easily distracted by their daily tasks, especially under stressful environments, making them likely to click on a malicious link or download a suspicious file. According to a study from Microsoft, people generally lose concentration after eight seconds, a shorter attention span than a goldfish. With an abundance of smart devices available, and an increasingly digital lifestyle, it's easy to see how so many stimuli could make it difficult to identify a suspicious email, particularly if the email intentionally includes multiple streams of media for the purpose of distracting the receiver.
  • Spearphishing can be almost undetectable: Some attacks are just so good that it's impossible to spot them by the naked eye. What happened to Snapchat and the Clinton campaign are two examples of how sophisticated phishing attacks can trick employees through highly targeted campaigns that impersonate internal executives or well-recognized vendors. Seagate also fell victim to a similar phishing scam, and its staff has since filed a lawsuit against the company after personal information was exposed. Phishing attacks have become so realistic that even the most cyber-aware recipient can be fooled into providing sensitive information. 
  • Curiosity is king:  Sometimes, curiosity is stronger than the sense of security, especially when it comes to an employer's computer. According to a recent study by FAU researchers in Germany, 56% of email recipients clicked on a link from an unknown sender despite knowing the risks. Why? Most reasoned that they were curious about the content of the photos or the identity of the sender. According FAU, curiosity and interest are natural human traits and, with the right timing and context, people will click on a link despite their security awareness.

Though employee training will always play a role in phishing mitigation, and it should, recent events prove it's not effective on its own. With increasingly clever and deceptive scams, matched with the massive amount of phishing emails sent daily, employees don't stand a chance in successfully defeating the phishing epidemic on their own.

Instead, organizations should turn to next-generation technologies to fill the gap and empower employees. While some argue encryption, multifactor authentication, and database security can be effective in deterring phishers, they're outdated techniques with risks and shortcomings. Today, forward-thinking organizations are implementing newer strategies to aid in phishing support such as sender reputation and email verification programs, including DomainKeys Identified Mail, Sender Policy Framework, and Domain Message Authentication & Reporting Conformance. They're not perfect, however. they won't identify suspicious links and attachments or stop a determined attacker who buys a domain and installs Domain Name System records to tell servers which IP address each domain is associated with.

In the future, the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning to identify phishing emails, learn from reported attacks, and create real-time signatures will help companies prepare for and prevent attacks that have been attempted around the world, without the need for human interaction.  

Related Content:

Eyal Benishti has spent more than a decade in the information security industry, with a focus on software R&D for startups and enterprises. Before establishing IRONSCALES, he served as security researcher and malware analyst at Radware, where he filed two patents in the ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
technicalaccademy
50%
50%
technicalaccademy,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/23/2017 | 1:36:35 AM
office
Thanks for sharing the limitations of phishing education.it is very helpful to me.once again thanks
News
A Startup With NSA Roots Wants Silently Disarming Cyberattacks on the Wire to Become the Norm
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  5/11/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Cybersecurity: What Is Truly Essential?
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  5/12/2021
Commentary
3 Cybersecurity Myths to Bust
Etay Maor, Sr. Director Security Strategy at Cato Networks,  5/11/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Google Maps is taking "interactive" to a whole new level!
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15279
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-18
An Improper Access Control vulnerability in the logging component of Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools for Windows versions prior to 6.6.23.320 allows a regular user to learn the scanning exclusion paths. This issue was discovered during external security research.
CVE-2021-3423
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-18
Uncontrolled Search Path Element vulnerability in the openssl component as used in Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security allows an attacker to load a third party DLL to elevate privileges. This issue affects Bitdefender GravityZone Business S...
CVE-2020-18194
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-17
Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in emlog v6.0.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by adding a crafted script as a link to a new blog post.
CVE-2020-18195
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-17
Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Pluck CMS v4.7.9 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code and delete a specific article via the component " /admin.php?action=page."
CVE-2020-18198
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-17
Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Pluck CMS v4.7.9 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code and delete specific images via the component " /admin.php?action=images."