Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

8/28/2020
01:05 PM
50%
50%

TA542 Returns With Emotet: What's Different Now

Researchers report the TA542 threat group has made code changes to its malware and started targeting new locations with Emotet.

TA542, a threat group known for distributing Emotet malware, returned this summer following a hiatus that spanned from Feb. 7 through July 17. Now back, its email campaigns are the most rampant by message volume, which is roughly the same as it was before its break.

Proofpoint researchers watching TA542 say aside from some new techniques and incremental changes, the group has made "surprisingly minimal change" in its tactics or tooling considering the length of time it was gone.

Related Content:

Microsoft: Emotet Attack Shut Down an Entire Business Network

Emotet Return Brings New Tactics & Evasion Techniques

Significant updates include the distribution of the Qbot affiliate "partner01," replacing The Trick as the primary malware payload delivered by Emotet. Researchers also noticed a change in the Emotet sending module, which can now deliver benign attachments in addition to malicious ones. Emails usually have a malicious URL or attachment; they sometimes, but rarely, include both.

Smaller changes were seen in the emails themselves, where researchers noticed a "significant volume" of thread hijacking and language localization. TA542 continues to leverage generic lures, as well as news-related bait related to COVID-19 and other topics. Similar to before the break, TA542 uses Word attachments with macros, PDF attachments, and URLs linking to Word files.

The group continues to target a core set of regions, including Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada. Now researchers see attackers expanding to test new geographies, such as Indonesia, the Philippines, Sweden, and India. 

"Whether they iterate and change their tactics or continue in the same manner, Emotet remains a highly dangerous threat," researchers state. 

Read the full analysis here.

 

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Wes_Spencer1
50%
50%
Wes_Spencer1,
User Rank: Author
9/1/2020 | 9:01:19 AM
Agreed!
We've seen a huge (and growing) number of Emotet campaigns also associated with qbot. Seems there's no end in sight. 
News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "The truth behind Stonehenge...."
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-27886
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
rakibtg Docker Dashboard before 2021-02-28 allows command injection in backend/utilities/terminal.js via shell metacharacters in the command parameter of an API request. NOTE: this is NOT a Docker, Inc. product.
CVE-2016-8153
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8154
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8155
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8156
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.