Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

6/12/2019
10:30 AM
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
100%
0%

Predicting Vulnerability Weaponization

Advances in data science are making it possible to shift vulnerability management from a reactive to a proactive discipline.

Keeping pace with the endless deluge of security vulnerabilities has become one of the truly Sisyphean tasks for enterprise IT and security teams. Every operating system, device, and application is a potential source of vulnerabilities. This can include the traditional laptops and servers that power an organization but also extends to virtual machines, cloud-based assets, Internet of Things, mobile devices, and the list goes on.

To make matters worse, the rate at which new vulnerabilities are being discovered has accelerated. A quick check of the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) shows that historically the industry would expect to see around 5,000 to 7,000 common vulnerabilities and exposures (CVEs) released each year. However, in 2017 that number spiked to 14,649, continued to climb to 16,515 in 2018, and shows no signs of slowing down. These numbers are likely underrepresenting the total number of vulnerabilities in the real world given that many platforms are not covered by CVE Numbering Authorities (typically, these are vendors or researchers that focus on specific products).

Weaponization Is the Key
However, not every vulnerability becomes weaponized (abused by an exploit or malware). In fact, most don't. Of the more than 120,000 total vulnerabilities tracked by the NVD, fewer than 24,000 have been weaponized. As a result, many organizations are turning to analytics and risk-based vulnerability management to prioritize those that are weaponized and have the highest impact.

Even this approach is somewhat reactive in that it relies on the attackers making the first move in the wild. New innovations are starting to change this equation. By applying data science and machine learning to vulnerabilities, researchers are increasingly able to predict which vulnerabilities will be weaponized even before threats are seen in the wild.

Let's take a look at how it works.

The Art and Science of Predicting Weaponization
Needless to say, the details underlying predictive models of weaponization can get quite complex. However, we can understand the basic logic behind them without diving into the specific algorithms and analysis.

First, it's important to curate the right data set. Simply having large amounts of data is not enough — we also need to have broad context around a vulnerability. For example, we will want to know a variety of details underlying a vulnerability such as the traits that contributed to its risk score, the underlying weakness that led to the vulnerability itself, how it would be abused in the context of an attack, the types of assets that it is likely to affect, and more.

For instance, Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) scores rely on a variety of base metrics to rate a vulnerability. Likewise, Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) data provides insight into the underlying weakness of a vulnerability, and Common Platform Enumeration (CPE) gives similar insight into the platform. Each of these perspectives can be highly predictive in their own right but become far more powerful as we learn to correlate across them. 

Exploitability and Impact
CVSS scores are built on a few base metrics that provide insight into the difficulty of exploiting a vulnerability and the impact that an exploit would have on a target. Obviously, from an attacker's perspective, the fewer constraints on an exploit and the higher the impact, the better. For example, a vulnerability that can be exploited remotely over a network is more valuable than one that requires the attacker to be on the local network or that requires user interaction in order to execute. 

Likewise, low attack complexity can greatly increase the chances that a vulnerability will be weaponized. Low complexity typically means that the attack simply works without that attacker needing to perform additional steps such as collecting local information. Privileges also play an important role. Many exploits will simply maintain the privileges of the targeted user or application.

However, vulnerabilities that can escalate the attacker's privileges to an admin or system level become highly strategic for an attacker. Identifying low-complexity attacks that either have remote code execution or privilege escalation is often a good start to predicting if a vulnerability will be weaponized.

Feeding the AI Engine
With a data set established, we need analytical models to gain predictive insights. By looking at historical weaponization trends, we can train algorithms to look across diverse types of data and identify the combination of traits that best predicts which vulnerabilities will be weaponized by attackers in the wild. Just as importantly, this approach can predict the speed at which a given vulnerability is likely to be weaponized. 

The end goal of this analysis is to allow security and IT teams to prioritize patching the few vulnerabilities that will actually become threats. Put another way, the goal is to find needles in the haystack before they even become needles.

Ultimately, predictive models should not be considered a perfect answer on their own. They can, however, help make vulnerability management a much more proactive discipline, where instead of constantly playing to catch up to attackers, defenders gain a first-mover advantage.

Related Content:

Dr. Srinivas Mukkamala is co-founder and CEO of RiskSense and a former advisor to the U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. Intelligence Community. He is an expert on malware analytics, breach exposure management, web application security, and enterprise risk reduction. Dr. ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
tdsan
50%
50%
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
6/29/2019 | 3:22:22 PM
Logical review of the analytics process
With a data set established, we need analytical models to gain predictive insights. By looking at historical weaponization trends, we can train algorithms to look across diverse types of data and identify the combination of traits that best predicts which vulnerabilities will be weaponized by attackers in the wild. Just as importantly, this approach can predict the speed at which a given vulnerability is likely to be weaponized.
  •  Traits and vulnerabilities - Couldn't we start with the threats that actually succeeded. Then take that information and categorize it using the risk score from CVE or others. take that information and create a relationship database (i.e SharedDB or No-SQL columnar DB) where big data comes into play to establish or identify those relationships, this will help the end-user determine the number of similarities between the variants or possible vulnerabilities that exist
  • Locations - identify where the code is coming from by associating the geographic regions, with the code, actors and success levels, this allows for those models (again Big Data) to start narrowing down the attacks to specific regions based on the type of attack, its function, success rate and locale (determine the type of attack and method of attack based on their success rate and design).
  • Finally, use ML to look at the attack vectors from a historical standpoint, the results from BigData can now inject its findings into the ML DB and from those relationshps, we can determine based on risk score if something else will occur as part of the variants evolution (most systems build on itself).

ML Concepts

 

Big Data
alpana.b
50%
50%
alpana.b,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/20/2019 | 6:42:52 AM
Automated Testing
Can there be a solution as Automated Testing? Or a testing that can run 24/7  and immediately identify existing or newly created vulnerabilities? At least for DDoS testing, I know there is such product available - this product doesn't need any maintenance window, for enterprises its a business as usual and testing report is handed over to security team to tackle issues with vendor. https://mazebolt.com/ddos-radar 

Do you see any such product for other security areas which can emerge as new technology?
dmddd
50%
50%
dmddd,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/13/2019 | 11:32:09 PM
Reference
Death Srinivas, Thanks for the interesting article. Would you mind sharing the reference of the underlying research paper? Best regards, David
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-6852
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
A CWE-200: Information Exposure vulnerability exists in Modicon Controllers (M340 CPUs, M340 communication modules, Premium CPUs, Premium communication modules, Quantum CPUs, Quantum communication modules - see security notification for specific versions), which could cause the disclosure of FTP har...
CVE-2019-6853
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
A CWE-79: Failure to Preserve Web Page Structure vulnerability exists in Andover Continuum (models 9680, 5740 and 5720, bCX4040, bCX9640, 9900, 9940, 9924 and 9702) , which could enable a successful Cross-site Scripting (XSS attack) when using the products web server.
CVE-2013-2092
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in Dolibarr ERP/CRM 3.3.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML in functions.lib.php.
CVE-2013-2093
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
Dolibarr ERP/CRM 3.3.1 does not properly validate user input in viewimage.php and barcode.lib.php which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands.
CVE-2015-3166
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
The snprintf implementation in PostgreSQL before 9.0.20, 9.1.x before 9.1.16, 9.2.x before 9.2.11, 9.3.x before 9.3.7, and 9.4.x before 9.4.2 does not properly handle system-call errors, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive information or have other unspecified impact via unknown vectors, as d...