Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

4/5/2019
03:15 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Phishing Campaign Targeting Verizon Mobile Users

Lookout Phishing AI, which discovered the attack, says it has been going on since late November.

Verizon is warning customers about a phishing campaign that is going specifically after mobile users.

Mobile devices have emerged as an effective attack vector, according to Jeremy Richards, principal security researcher at Lookout Phishing AI, which discovered the phishing kit. 

"Since many mobile devices lack traditional security, I expect we will continue to see these attacks increase alongside mobile device usage," Richards wrote in a blog post earlier this week. "These attacks, when opened on a desktop, clearly look like a poorly made phishing domain, but on a mobile device, they look legitimate."

When users open the phishing email on a mobile device, it looks like it's from Verizon customer support, according to Richards. The campaign has, in fact, been going on since late November; to date, the attackers have registered some 51 Verizon customer phishing domains. Verizon has been made aware of the issue, Richards wrote, and has been suspending the domains.

Aaron Higbee, chief technology officer and co-founder at Cofense, says while it's true that mobile phishing attacks are on the rise, he believes the attack Lookout reported largely focuses on consumer-side attacks.

"Most organizations keep devices up-to-date with [mobile device management]," Higbee says. "This kind of report gets people worried about mobile phishing threats ... but mobile devices are more secure than desktop computers. These are mostly consumer fraud attacks, like an IRS scam for a Social Security number or a Netflix account. They are not primarily going after corporate credentials and business data."

In an interview with Dark Reading, Lookout's Richards disputes that notion, insisting that access to a user's mobile Verizon account can become very valuable to an attacker.

"We see this as a crime of opportunity," Richards says. "The attacker will assess who the user is. If it's just a Netflix account, that's one thing. But if the user is a CEO or CFO, they can monetize it much differently. Once they have access to a mobile phone account, the attackers can use the stolen credentials to launch business email compromises, fraudulent wire transfers, and ransomware."

The Media Trust reports that mobile attacks are most certainly on the rise. For example, they report a 46% increase in mobile attacks (59% are mobile phishing) from just February to March alone.

"There's no question that mobile attacks have increased significantly," says Usman Rahim, digital security and operations manager at The Media Trust. "Companies may have a policy restricting the use of personal phones on the job, but there's really no way to restrict it."

Lookout's Richards says user education has become paramount. His top tip: If a browser asks for your password, assume you are getting tricked. Best to bookmark a site and use that as a login.

"Users should also be suspicious of emails that drive a sense of urgency, that ask the user to bypass standard procedures and common sense," he adds.

Related Content:

 

 

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop agenda here.

Steve Zurier has more than 30 years of journalism and publishing experience, most of the last 24 of which were spent covering networking and security technology. Steve is based in Columbia, Md. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
lisarboutte
50%
50%
lisarboutte,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/8/2019 | 6:36:04 AM
Great
Wooow its greeaat)
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-6852
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
A CWE-200: Information Exposure vulnerability exists in Modicon Controllers (M340 CPUs, M340 communication modules, Premium CPUs, Premium communication modules, Quantum CPUs, Quantum communication modules - see security notification for specific versions), which could cause the disclosure of FTP har...
CVE-2019-6853
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
A CWE-79: Failure to Preserve Web Page Structure vulnerability exists in Andover Continuum (models 9680, 5740 and 5720, bCX4040, bCX9640, 9900, 9940, 9924 and 9702) , which could enable a successful Cross-site Scripting (XSS attack) when using the products web server.
CVE-2013-2092
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in Dolibarr ERP/CRM 3.3.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML in functions.lib.php.
CVE-2013-2093
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
Dolibarr ERP/CRM 3.3.1 does not properly validate user input in viewimage.php and barcode.lib.php which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands.
CVE-2015-3166
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
The snprintf implementation in PostgreSQL before 9.0.20, 9.1.x before 9.1.16, 9.2.x before 9.2.11, 9.3.x before 9.3.7, and 9.4.x before 9.4.2 does not properly handle system-call errors, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive information or have other unspecified impact via unknown vectors, as d...