Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

8/6/2019
05:30 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Mimecast Rejected Over 67 Billion Emails. Here's What It Learned

New research warns that security pros must guard against updates to older malware and more manipulative social-engineering techniques.

New research released today from Mimecast has found that the bad threat actors are modifying old exploits as well as changing their attack techniques in which they link to documents or landing pages on well-known cloud platforms using URLs that otherwise would appear to be legitimate.

The report, "Mimecast's Threat Intelligence Report, Black Hat Edition 2019," leverages the processing of some 160 billion emails during the period of April 2019 to June 2019. During this time, Mimecast rejected more than 67 billion of those emails and based its subsequent analysis on rejections classified as spam, opportunistic and targeted attacks, and impersonation detections.

"We have seen a marked increase in malware links," says Josh Douglas, Mimecast's vice president of threat intelligence. "We also found that nearly 30% of the impersonation attacks were targeted at the management and consulting sectors and biotechnology."

Peter Firstbrook, a research vice president who covers security at Gartner, says he doesn't worry too much about attachments and links. That's because most vendors are good at detecting them, and most organizations have endpoint protection and secure Web gateways that serve to backstop email security, he explains. However, he say he's very concerned about impersonation attacks, mainly business email compromises (BECs).

"The BEC-type attacks are the most interesting and difficult to detect," Firstbrook says. "There is no payload or URL to detect. It's typically just a person-to-person email from a legitimate account. Users trust email not knowing or understanding that email is not an authentication method. Companies are losing real money to these types of attacks, and few legacy solutions adequately protect them. Even newer solutions are still evolving their techniques to detect these threats."

Mimecast's Douglas says security managers should respond with the following: a layered security strategy, advanced targeted threat protection, and better user awareness training.

The Mimecast report also identifies professional education, which includes private educational companies, colleges, institutes, and training providers, as the most targeted industry. Mimecast believes this is because of higher education's inherent conflict with being open institutions of higher learning. Attackers prey on students who may not have the highest security awareness, plus numerous institutions conduct federal government research, so the attackers are after intellectual property and classified research.

Other highly targeted sectors include software and software-as-a-service (SaaS), which were hit with a number of attacks during this past quarter using Adwind and QRat. Similar to Adwind, QRat is a Trojan that targets Java-based platforms and uses Java Archive (.JAR) attachments in the malicious emails. IT resellers were also hit with a large number of Adwind attacks during the quarter, as well as a mixture of other Trojan downloaders.

The report also found Emotet to be another of the more active campaigns. What started as a banking Trojan in 2014 has evolved and now appears to download secondary malware. This may be because the threat actors behind Emotet have adapted it into a packing and delivery service for other threat actors, the report states, basically using it as a downloader-as-a-service for other malware.

Related Content:

Steve Zurier has more than 30 years of journalism and publishing experience, most of the last 24 of which were spent covering networking and security technology. Steve is based in Columbia, Md. View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
random2127z
100%
0%
random2127z,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/6/2019 | 9:30:04 AM
Typo
Hey DR, 

 

Just a quick heads up, but in the text of the article it says 67 billions instead of milllions like in the title, which is what I am assuming is what was meant. 

 

Best,

Drew
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/14/2020
Omdia Research Launches Page on Dark Reading
Tim Wilson, Editor in Chief, Dark Reading 7/9/2020
Why Cybersecurity's Silence Matters to Black Lives
Tiffany Ricks, CEO, HacWare,  7/8/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-1448
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Word software when it fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1446, CVE-2020-1447.
CVE-2020-1449
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Project software when the software fails to check the source markup of a file, aka 'Microsoft Project Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'.
CVE-2020-1450
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
A cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists when Microsoft SharePoint Server does not properly sanitize a specially crafted web request to an affected SharePoint server, aka 'Microsoft Office SharePoint XSS Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1451, CVE-2020-1456.
CVE-2020-1451
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
A cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists when Microsoft SharePoint Server does not properly sanitize a specially crafted web request to an affected SharePoint server, aka 'Microsoft Office SharePoint XSS Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1450, CVE-2020-1456.
CVE-2020-1454
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
This vulnerability is caused when SharePoint Server does not properly sanitize a specially crafted request to an affected SharePoint server.An authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted request to an affected SharePoint server, aka 'Microsoft SharePoint Re...