Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

11/12/2020
08:20 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Like the Energizer Bunny, Trickbot Goes On and On

Recent efforts to take down the virulent botnet have been largely -- but not entirely -- successful.

Operators of the Trickbot botnet that has infected more than 1 million systems worldwide with ransomware and other malware are providing a textbook example of just how difficult it can be to truly take out international cybercrime operations.

Weeks after US Cyber Command, Microsoft, and several others took coordinated action to extensively disrupt Trickbot activity, there are signs the botnet operators have still not fully given up yet.

Related Content:

Trickbot Tenacity Shows Infrastructure Resistant to Takedowns

The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence

New on The Edge: 9 New Tactics to Spread Security Awareness

Threat intelligence firm Intel 471 this week reported it had observed signs that a new version of Trickbot is being distributed via spam even as the operators of the malware have begun using a different tool known as BazarLoader to distribute Ryuk ransomware.

According to Intel 471, BazarLoader appears to have been developed by the same group behind Trickbot, sharing some of the same code and infrastructure as the latter. It's presently unclear whether Trickbot operators have switched completely to BazarLoader or if they would return to using the Trickbot botnet at a later date, the threat intelligence firm said in a report this week.

The Ryuk ransomware version that's being distributed in growing numbers has also been associated with Trickbot, Intel 471 said. Together, the data indicates that the group behind Trickbot is still successfully launching targeted ransomware attacks, though their original infrastructure appears to have been all but wiped out, Intel 471 said.

Kacey Clark, threat researcher at Digital Shadows, says Ryuk and Conti ransomware delivery has increased in recent weeks, as has threat groups who are purchasing access to Trickbot-infected machines to leverage in their own attacks. 

"Throughout the takedown efforts carried out by security practitioners, Trickbot operators have continuously attempted to spin up new [command-and-control] instances," Clark says. "[As a result], Trickbot operators still maintain access to non-US-based infrastructure, allowing them to continue their attacks."  

Trickbot and the group behind it have presented a persistent problem for defenders for several years. The malware first surfaced in 2016 as a banking Trojan and over the years has morphed into a sophisticated tool for delivering ransomware, cryptominers, and other banking Trojans. The operators of the malware itself have established what is believed to be a lucrative crimeware-as-a-service operation that, among other things, sells access to thousands of networks they have previously breached.

The group has been associated with a particularly sophisticated malware toolset called Anchor, which is designed for use against high-value targets. Last year, Trickbot operators are believed to have provided North Korea's Lazarus Group with access to Anchor in a first-of-its-kind collaboration between a cybercrime group and an advanced persistent threat actor. Earlier this year there were concerns about the group potentially targeting election infrastructure as well.

Coordinated Takedown Attempts
Between September and early November, US Cyber Command, Microsoft, and several others including the Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis Committee (FS-ISAC) took a series of steps to disrupt and break Trickbot activities. The efforts included disrupting the group's back-end servers and seizing numerous IP addresses associated with Trickbot command-and-control (C2) servers.

Mark Arena, CEO of Intel 471, says US Cyber Command, among other actions, likely breached the back end of Trickbot's infrastructure and used that to modify the configuration files that were sent to Trickbot infected systems.

"The tactics used by US Cyber Command appeared to be orientated toward cutting off the actors behind Trickbot from the systems they had infected," Arena says. It's likely that the action caused Trickbot operators to lose access to a "decent amount" of infected systems, he says.

Microsoft's focus, meanwhile, was on taking down Trickbot's control servers by contacting the respective hosting companies and ISPs using court orders.

The actions have considerably disrupted Trickbot operations but have not erased them completely. With each infrastructure hit, the group has kept devising ways to regain control of it. For instance, when Cyber Command initially succeeded in poisoning Trickbot configuration files, the group was able to restore working files on their C2 servers in 24 hours Intel 471 said. Similarly, when Microsoft began its takedown operations, Trickbot kept setting up new infrastructure in response.

For the moment, the substantial efforts to squelch Trickbot activity appear to have largely worked. At the very least, the actions have forced the threat actors to spend time devising new ways to respond.

"It's expected that they will invest greater efforts in redundancy, including globally distributed command-and-control servers and backup command-and-control methods that are resistant to takedowns," Arena says. "The only real long-term blow that we expect to be effective at halting Trickbot permanently would be arrests of the criminals behind Trickbot."  

Clark says the continued Trickbot activity shows how resilient and quick on their feet malware operators can be when pressured.

"As the takedown efforts forced a significant amount of Trickbot infrastructure offline, operators identified new C2 servers and leveraged out-of-band infrastructure to continue their campaign," she says. "Unfortunately, operations of this caliber are resilient and complex, making it very challenging to rid the malware from existence entirely."

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
What the FedEx Logo Taught Me About Cybersecurity
Matt Shea, Head of Federal @ MixMode,  6/4/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
A View From Inside a Deception
Sara Peters, Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/2/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-21554
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
Dell PowerEdge R640, R740, R740XD, R840, R940, R940xa, MX740c, MX840c, and, Dell Precision 7920 Rack Workstation BIOS contain a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in systems with Intel Optane DC Persistent Memory installed. A local malicious user with high privileges may potentially exploit t...
CVE-2021-21555
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
Dell PowerEdge R640, R740, R740XD, R840, R940, R940xa, MX740c, MX840c, and T640 Server BIOS contain a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in systems with NVDIMM-N installed. A local malicious user with high privileges may potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to a denial of Service, a...
CVE-2021-21556
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
Dell PowerEdge R640, R740, R740XD, R840, R940, R940xa, MX740c, MX840c, and T640 Server BIOS contain a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in systems with NVDIMM-N installed. A local malicious user with high privileges may potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to a denial of Service, ...
CVE-2021-21557
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
Dell PowerEdge Server BIOS and select Dell Precision Rack BIOS contain an out-of-bounds array access vulnerability. A local malicious user with high privileges may potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to a denial of service, arbitrary code execution, or information disclosure in System Ma...
CVE-2021-32682
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
elFinder is an open-source file manager for web, written in JavaScript using jQuery UI. Several vulnerabilities affect elFinder 2.1.58. These vulnerabilities can allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code and commands on the server hosting the elFinder PHP connector, even with minimal configuration...