Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

7/31/2018
03:50 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Hundreds of Registry Keys Exposed to Microsoft COM Hijacking

Experts believe there could be thousands more in the wild.

Microsoft Component Object Model (COM) hijacking is an old type of cyberattack getting a new spin as attackers find stealthy ways to maintain persistence and evade detection.

The Microsoft COM is a system integrated into Windows to facilitate interaction between software components through the operating system. COM is managed in the Windows registry, which contains keys that reference Phantom COM objects. These objects could refer to files that no longer exist on the hard drive and include old applications or obsolete programs.

Even if files are gone, registry keys will continue to refer to them. If an attacker hijacks a phantom COM object ID of a trusted application and instead uses it for a malicious file, he can load and execute the file onto the OS. So long as the COM object ID (CLSID) has been registered as a legitimate object, the malicious file will appear legitimate and bypass security tools.

Security tools often miss COM hijacking because hundreds of CLSIDs are available and are all connected to common Windows processes, such as explorer.exe, chrome.exe, svchost, and iexplore. New ones appear each day, making it tough for systems to keep up.

COM hijacking is now gaining popularity as attackers seek new ways to maintain persistence without autorun entries, which are easy to map, explains Cyberbit research director Meir Brown, in a new report on the attack vector. Researchers found hundreds of registry keys are vulnerable to COM hijacking, far more than was first believed.

"We knew COM hijacking was used for persistence and have seen some of this used for injection, but didn't know the scale of this phenomenon – how many entries there are in the registry which are vulnerable to COM hijacking," Meir explains. The tactic is commonly referred to as a persistence mechanism, but it's also one of the most effective ways to achieve stealth.

Hunting Registry Keys Online
Researchers ran a proof-of-concept experiment in which they put themselves in the attackers' shoes and sought out Phantom COM objects to take over. They mapped registry keys that failed to find and load a file, and tried to use those keys to load a fake dynamic link library (DLL).

The trial was a "troubling" success, says Brown, as researchers were able to load and run their DLL within the context of valid applications. The Windows machine loaded all of their objects without any side effects.

As they hunted for keys online, researchers found multiple samples using these keys in the wild. Hundreds of keys are vulnerable to COM hijacking and Phantom COM objects loading, they concluded. The process is easy for attackers to implement and doesn't require them to leverage code injection, a technique more frequently picked up by detection platforms.

COM hijacking is considered dangerous because it runs using legitimate user privileges, doesn't require reboot, and does reveal suspicious activity to the target, Meir says. It's gaining popularity; organizations should be aware and monitor the registry.

Researchers believe the scope of this issue goes far beyond the hundreds of potential vulnerabilities they found and could potentially reach into the thousands. Further, while COM hijacking is used in the wild, it remains less common than registry run key and injection tactics.

Related Content:

 

 

 

Black Hat USA returns to Las Vegas with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
seanmajece
50%
50%
seanmajece,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/2/2018 | 5:44:48 AM
My opinion
In my opinion, it will be better for users to use IOS these adys.
Zero-Factor Authentication: Owning Our Data
Nick Selby, Chief Security Officer at Paxos Trust Company,  2/19/2020
44% of Security Threats Start in the Cloud
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/19/2020
Ransomware Damage Hit $11.5B in 2019
Dark Reading Staff 2/20/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-7914
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
btif/src/btif_dm.c in Android before 5.1 does not properly enforce the temporary nature of a Bluetooth pairing, which allows user-assisted remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via crafted Bluetooth packets after the tapping of a crafted NFC tag.
CVE-2016-4606
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
Curl before 7.49.1 in Apple OS X before macOS Sierra prior to 10.12 allows remote or local attackers to execute arbitrary code, gain sensitive information, cause denial-of-service conditions, bypass security restrictions, and perform unauthorized actions. This may aid in other attacks.
CVE-2020-5243
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
uap-core before 0.7.3 is vulnerable to a denial of service attack when processing crafted User-Agent strings. Some regexes are vulnerable to regular expression denial of service (REDoS) due to overlapping capture groups. This allows remote attackers to overload a server by setting the User-Agent hea...
CVE-2019-14688
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-20
Trend Micro has repackaged installers for several Trend Micro products that were found to utilize a version of an install package that had a DLL hijack vulnerability that could be exploited during a new product installation. The vulnerability was found to ONLY be exploitable during an initial produc...
CVE-2019-19694
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-20
The Trend Micro Security 2019 (15.0.0.1163 and below) consumer family of products is vulnerable to a denial of service (DoS) attack in which a malicious actor could manipulate a key file at a certain time during the system startup process to disable the product's malware protection functions or the ...