Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

4/12/2016
08:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

How To Monetize Stolen Payment Card Data

The carding value chain not only relies on carders and buyers, but individuals who don't even know they're involved.

Bosses of the operations that turn stolen payment card data into cash have been known to take home as much as $1 million of profit in one year. One of the reasons they're so profitable: They scam and stiff thousands of the people who make the operation work.  

In a new report today, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Security Research outlined the process and the players in this value chain. To monetize stolen payment card data, organized criminals buy goods and then sell them for cash. According to HPE, in nearly all cases, card data was stolen from US accountholders, goods were bought in the US from online retailers in the US, and goods were shipped to Russia via intermediaries located in the US.

Beneath the bosses leading the operation are a network of administrators, "stuffers," and "drops," mostly managed via the Web. More specifically:  

  • Admins notify "stuffers" about what goods need to be purchased and, sometimes, what retailers they should be purchased from. Walmart, BestBuy, AT&T, Sprint, and Verizon were popular choices.
  • Stuffers, located in the US, buy goods online -- a wide variety of products ranging from electronics, to nutrition products, to toys, to rifle scopes. Stuffers are paid a 25- to 40% cut, depending upon the item.
  • The stuffers have the goods shipped to "drops," located in the US. 
  • Admins purchase labels from fraudulent shipping label services that forge labels for legitimate parcel delivery services like FedEx, UPS, and the US Postal Service.
  • Admins send the labels to drops.
  • Drops repackage goods with fraudulent labels and reship goods to Russia, using legitimate delivery services. The drops do not know that the items were bought illegally or that the shipping labels are fraudulent.

The drops were often "recruited" -- or, more accurately, scammed -- through social media advertising "work from home" opportunities that required no special skills but promised base salaries of as much as $2,500 per month.

However, the drops are almost never paid at all, according to the report. In fact, the admin's workflow software includes a system for tracking when drops sign up, quit, and become "dangerous" -- meaning they're expected to quit soon when they realize they are never going to see a dime for their reshipping efforts. Adding insult to injury, when drops sign up, they are convinced to submit a host of personal information -- including scans of government-issued IDs and proof of address -- as part of their "onboarding" process for the job.

From the report:

Recruiters find it more cost effective to recruit new drops from those looking for a "work from home" opportunity than to actually maintain and pay drops on an ongoing basis. This practice has the added benefit of isolating the most exposed part of the operation from the rest of the organization. Drops are exposed to very little if any of the true organization. ...

It's important to understand that drops are not a part of the organization; rather, they are as much a victim as others in the types of fraud schemes targeting human assets for exploitation.

Admins and stuffers, however, are key members of the organization. Admins manage the day-to-day technical functions of the Web interface through which business is conducted -- including taking orders for the products Russian buyers want, notifying stuffers about what those products are, connecting stuffers with drops, and tracking packages.

The operability and user interfaces of different re-shipper sites are so similar that researchers believe that these different operations must use the same software developers. 

     

Gain insight into the latest threats and emerging best practices for managing them. Attend the Security Track at Interop Las Vegas, May 2-6. Register now!

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/6/2020
Ripple20 Threatens Increasingly Connected Medical Devices
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/30/2020
DDoS Attacks Jump 542% from Q4 2019 to Q1 2020
Dark Reading Staff 6/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15570
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-06
The parse_report() function in whoopsie.c in Whoopsie through 0.2.69 mishandles memory allocation failures, which allows an attacker to cause a denial of service via a malformed crash file.
CVE-2020-15569
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-06
PlayerGeneric.cpp in MilkyTracker through 1.02.00 has a use-after-free in the PlayerGeneric destructor.
CVE-2020-7690
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-06
It's possible to inject JavaScript code via the html method.
CVE-2020-7691
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-06
It's possible to use <<script>script> in order to go over the filtering regex.
CVE-2020-15562
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-06
An issue was discovered in Roundcube Webmail before 1.2.11, 1.3.x before 1.3.14, and 1.4.x before 1.4.7. It allows XSS via a crafted HTML e-mail message, as demonstrated by a JavaScript payload in the xmlns (aka XML namespace) attribute of a HEAD element when an SVG element exists.