Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

12/10/2018
06:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

'Highly Active' Seedworm Group Hits IT Services, Governments

Since September, the cyber espionage actors have targeted more than 130 victims in 30 organizations including NGOs, oil and gas, and telecom businesses.

Cyber espionage group Seedworm has been on a tear recently, extending its  targets to the telecom, IT services, and oil and gas industries.

According to new research from Symantec's DeepSight Managed Adversary and Threat Intelligence (MATI) team, Seedworm - aka MuddyWater - is constantly evolving, as well as relying on publicly available tools to launch hundreds of successful attacks. Seedworm has been in operation since at least 2017, with its most recent activity occurring this month. Recent attacks aimed to collect data on targets mostly in the Middle East, Europe, and North America.

In September, the researchers found evidence of Seedworm and the APT28 (Fancy Bear, Swallowtail) espionage group on a machine located in the Brazil-based embassy of an oil-producing country. Two active groups on one computer was a red flag: at first, principal cyber intelligence analyst Jonathan Wrolstad thought they might be the same one. As it turned out, it was two attack groups operating independently inside the embassy's network.

"Because this victim was an embassy, it was likely to receive interest from a lot of cyber espionage groups," Wrolstad explains. "We assess it was just a coincidence that these two groups were on the same victim at exactly the same time."

The team continued looking into Seedworm and discovered new intelligence on the group, which he says likely operates out of the Middle East. Targets typically include embassies and government agencies within countries in the region; however, lately attackers have been adding oil and gas firms, telecom companies, and IT services to their list of victims.

Of the 131 victims the attackers targeted from mid-Sept. to late Nov. 2018, 39% were in Pakistan, 14% in Turkey, 8% in Russia, and 5% in Saudi Arabia. One-quarter were telecommunications firms, 16% were government agency IT services, and 14% were in oil and gas production.

While there is no definitive reason why Seedworm is focused on telecommunications and IT services, Wrolstad speculates they could be interested in gaining access to customers of those firms. That said, targets in the oil and gas industry point to added financial motivation.

Changing Tools and Techniques

Seedworm values speed and agility over operational security, a trait that helped researchers uncover more details on their operations, Wrolstad explains. They regularly adopt new tactics and techniques to stay hidden and consistently improve their operations over time.

Analysts could pinpoint the group's entryway and subsequent activity, which include new variants of their so-called Powermud backdoor, a new backdoor (Powermuddy), and custom tools to steal passwords, create reverse shells, escalate privilege, and use Windows' cabinet creation tool.

"Powermud is a tool they've been using since at least early 2017, and they've been updating it the entire time," says Wrolstad. Both Powermud and Powermuddy are PowerShell-based tools, and Powermuddy is not an evolution of the earlier tool but a new one altogether, he says.

Seedworm began using its new backdoor earlier this summer, which he expects they created to continue evading detection. Neither backdoor is more effective than the other, however, he adds.

Powermud is controlled from behind a proxy network to conceal its command-and-control location. After they use Powermud or Powermuddy to compromise a machine, attackers deploy a tool to steal passwords saved in browsers and email accounts – a sign they're after email, social media, and chat access.

But, of course, it's not all they're after. Open source tools LaZagne and Crackmapexec help them snag Windows authorization credentials, researchers report, and Seedworm uses unmodified versions of these tools in addition to custom versions that aren't used by any other threat group. Publicly available tools let Seedworm's actors quickly update operations using others' code.

"They're using tools that are different from what we might have seen in the past," says Al Cooley, Symantec director of product management. "All of these are typical of a group as they evolve and try to stay effective."

Unlike threat groups that write new malware for each operation, Seedworm uses minimal effort to adapt and evolve while staying effective, says Wrolstad. "They are very agile and quick to adapt, and also very successful," he adds, pointing to the 130 successful compromises.

Comfortable in the Spotlight

It's common for nation-states to pay attention to press so they know what security researchers know about them, says Wrolstad, but Seedworm seems to like attention more than most.

"One thing that's interesting about this group is they do seem very aware of the research that goes on surrounding their activities," he explains. For example, one of their software tools has a command called "muddy," alluding to MuddyWater, a name other vendors use for Seedworm.

"There's evidence of [Seedworm] following the people who write on them so they can discover how those people are counseling organizations to protect themselves," says Cooley.

Related Content:

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
How Attackers Infiltrate the Supply Chain & What to Do About It
Shay Nahari, Head of Red-Team Services at CyberArk,  7/16/2019
US Mayors Commit to Just Saying No to Ransomware
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/16/2019
The Problem with Proprietary Testing: NSS Labs vs. CrowdStrike
Brian Monkman, Executive Director at NetSecOPEN,  7/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-12551
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
In SweetScape 010 Editor 9.0.1, improper validation of arguments in the internal implementation of the Memcpy function (provided by the scripting engine) allows an attacker to overwrite arbitrary memory, which could lead to code execution.
CVE-2019-12552
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
In SweetScape 010 Editor 9.0.1, an integer overflow during the initialization of variables could allow an attacker to cause a denial of service.
CVE-2019-3414
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
All versions up to V1.19.20.02 of ZTE OTCP product are impacted by XSS vulnerability. Due to XSS, when an attacker invokes the security management to obtain the resources of the specified operation code owned by a user, the malicious script code could be transmitted in the parameter. If the front en...
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
tcpdump.org tcpdump 4.9.2 is affected by: CWE-126: Buffer Over-read. The impact is: May expose Saved Frame Pointer, Return Address etc. on stack. The component is: line 234: "ND_PRINT((ndo, "%s", buf));", in function named "print_prefix", in "print-hncp.c". Th...
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
aubio 0.4.8 and earlier is affected by: null pointer. The impact is: crash. The component is: filterbank. The attack vector is: pass invalid arguments to new_aubio_filterbank. The fixed version is: after commit eda95c9c22b4f0b466ae94c4708765eaae6e709e.