Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

06:00 PM

Attackers Prefer Ransomware to Stealing Data

Financial data is still in demand, but ransomware becomes the most popular way to try to cash in from compromised companies, according to Trustwave.

For the first time, more cybersecurity incidents involved recovering from ransomware attacks rather than dealing with the fallout of stolen data — a sign that attackers are shifting their tactics, according to cybersecurity services firm Trustwave, which published its annual threat report today.

Ransomware accounted for 18% of the compromises investigated by Trustwave in 2019, up from only 4% the previous year, while attacks that targeted financial data accounted for 17% of breaches, up from 1% the previous year, according to the firm. The previous two most targeted data types — chip-and-pin information and user credentials — fell to 14% and 13%, respectively, of investigations in 2019, down from 25% and 21% of compromises in 2018.

For the attackers, ransomware ends up being simple and easy, says Karl Sigler, senior threat intelligence manager for Trustwave's SpiderLabs.

"This is the first time we have seen attackers make it their primary goal to infect customers' systems with ransomware," he says. "That's kind of interesting, considering that, as a trend, ransomware declined for a year or two. Now, instead, it has come back because it is so very easy to monetize."

The resurgence of ransomware is not the only trend highlighed in the "2020 Trustwave Global Security Report."

The report also shows the danger for companies that have not developed good detection procedures. The average company that detected a threat using internal systems did so in two days, improving significantly on the 11 days required in 2018. Yet if an outside group had to report the threat to the company, the attackers were able to work inside the company network for 86 days, an increase over the 55 days in 2018.

"When you can detect a compromise quickly and do it yourself, you can limit the amount of damage that is occurring," Sigler says. "The longer the attacker has a presence on your network, the more malware that is spread, the more malware they will spread to other systems."

Part of the reason for the move to ransomware and away from data theft is that exfiltrating and distilling data to a sellable form is difficult, Sigler says. Many ransomware programs do not even have the capability to extract data, and attackers fear that any attempt to copy data will result in detection, he says. 

"To infect systems with ransomware after you steal the data from the systems becomes a harder lift," Sigler says.

More than a third of attacks against the most targeted industries — travel and hospitality — consisted of ransomware attacks, according to Trustwave data.

While e-mail remains popular as a way to conduct fraud — nearly four of every 10 spam e-mails promoted phony pharmaceuticals, and business e-mail compromise (BEC) remains the most costly type of attack — malware-ladened spam also became more targeted, sending a smaller volume of e-mails to a smaller group of people. 

In 2019, only 28% of all e-mail was classified as spam, down from 87% in 2017, and only 0.2% of spam messages had a malicious attachment, down from 6% in 2018, Trustwave's report states. 

Point-of-sale compromises are no longer a favored target of attackers, Trustwave states. In 2019, only 5% of compromises attempted to steal card data from point-of-sale devices and software, a steep decline from the 31% of incidents in 2016.

The move toward ransomware and away from point of sale will likely continue this year, especially with many nations' economies shut down. With the sudden shift caused by the coronavirus pandemic and the move to remote work, predicting whether the trends from 2019 will continue is difficult, Sigler says. 

The attack surface area of most companies, however, has likely grown significantly, he says.

"You have a huge portion of the workforce who has never worked from home before, and that makes them vulnerable," he says. "Things like fake updates and fake packages will be a major concern, where previously security at the office could have caught them."

Related Content:

A listing of free products and services compiled for Dark Reading by Omdia analysts to help meet the challenges of COVID-19. 

Check out The Edge, Dark Reading's new section for features, threat data, and in-depth perspectives. Today's top story: "Learning From the Honeypot: A Researcher and a Duplicitous Docker Image."

Veteran technology journalist of more than 20 years. Former research engineer. Written for more than two dozen publications, including CNET News.com, Dark Reading, MIT's Technology Review, Popular Science, and Wired News. Five awards for journalism, including Best Deadline ... View Full Bio

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 10/23/2020
Modern Day Insider Threat: Network Bugs That Are Stealing Your Data
David Pearson, Principal Threat Researcher,  10/21/2020
Are You One COVID-19 Test Away From a Cybersecurity Disaster?
Alan Brill, Senior Managing Director, Cyber Risk Practice, Kroll,  10/21/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
libtac in pam_tacplus through 1.5.1 lacks a check for a failure of RAND_bytes()/RAND_pseudo_bytes(). This could lead to use of a non-random/predictable session_id.
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
An out-of-bounds read in the JavaScript Interpreter in Facebook Hermes prior to commit 8cb935cd3b2321c46aa6b7ed8454d95c75a7fca0 allows attackers to cause a denial of service attack or possible further memory corruption via crafted JavaScript. Note that this is only exploitable if the application usi...
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
Ruckus through is affected by remote command injection. An authenticated user can submit a query to the API (/service/v1/createUser endpoint), injecting arbitrary commands that will be executed as root user via web.py.
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
Ruckus vRioT through has an API backdoor that is hardcoded into validate_token.py. An unauthenticated attacker can interact with the service API by using a backdoor value as the Authorization header.
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
In the git-tag-annotation-action (open source GitHub Action) before version 1.0.1, an attacker can execute arbitrary (*) shell commands if they can control the value of [the `tag` input] or manage to alter the value of [the `GITHUB_REF` environment variable]. The problem has been patched in version ...