Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

At RSAC, SOC 'Sees' User Behaviors

Instruments at the RSA Security Operations Center give analysts insight into attendee behavior on an open network.

RSA CONFERENCE 2018 – San Francisco – At RSAC 2018 the SOC is a demonstration site. It has some hard limits — no visibility to the external IP interfaces being the most significant — but it has tremendous visibility into what happens on the wireless network that supports the tens of thousands of attendees using the open system. And that network visibility translates into great visibility into the behavior of network security professionals in the wild.

A team of network security specialists including Cisco's Jessica Bair staff the SOC, watching traffic of various sorts flow to and from the devices carried by attendees, exhibitors, and staff. Because the SOC isn't blocking any traffic, there's great interest in the monitoring, which happens courtesy of RSA NetWitness Packets; potentially malicious traffic is further given static analysis by Threat Grid.

One of the things visitors notice in the SOC fishbowl is a screen filled with a rolling list of partially obfuscated passwords. That's when they see two important things about conference attendees, one of them good, one of them not so much.

Almost all of the passwords are either strong or very strong. That's great, and shows that security professionals, at least, have acted on the need for stronger passwords.

The problem comes in the fact that the passwords can be seen to be strong; they're being sent in clear text. It's a sign of a lesson half-learned and indicative of problems likely to plague all levels of the computer-using population of companies.

And passwords aren't the only data being sent in the clear. Other examples of documents analysts have seen traversing the network include business plans, resumes, and information on competitors, according to one of the engineers staffing the SOC. 

While the passwords and documents traversing the network represent a significant security risk, Bair quickly points out that there is no threat of long-term information release; the hard disks from the monitoring and analysis appliances are crushed at the end of the conference.

Of course, the monitoring infrastructure established in the SOC sees more that just potentially embarrassing clear text documents. Malware and possible malware were identified and analyzed through Cisco's Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) Anywhere with its Threat Intelligence Cloud. Information on potential malware seen was communicated among all nodes of the security network and other security networks related to the RSA Conference infrastructure for more rapid identification and (potential) remediation.

Ultimately, Bair likened the activity of the SOC to the basic instruction given to fighting women and men of the U.S. Army. "You have to do three things: Shoot, move, and communicate. If you're not doing all three three, you're [redacted] dead."

In cybersecurity terms, the system must actively defend the organization's assets, be agile in shifting its activities to meet evolving threats, and share information and commands with other networks looking for malware and malicious behavior. With all three, an organization has a chance to practice effective behavior. Without the three, then sooner or later your organization is truly [redacted] dead.

Related content:

Interop ITX 2018

Join Dark Reading LIVE for a two-day Cybersecurity Crash Course at Interop ITX. Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the agenda here. Register with Promo Code DR200 and save $200.

Curtis Franklin Jr. is Senior Editor at Dark Reading. In this role he focuses on product and technology coverage for the publication. In addition he works on audio and video programming for Dark Reading and contributes to activities at Interop ITX, Black Hat, INsecurity, and ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Mobile Banking Malware Up 50% in First Half of 2019
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/17/2020
Active Directory Needs an Update: Here's Why
Raz Rafaeli, CEO and Co-Founder at Secret Double Octopus,  1/16/2020
New Attack Campaigns Suggest Emotet Threat Is Far From Over
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  1/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-5216
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
In Secure Headers (RubyGem secure_headers), a directive injection vulnerability is present in versions before 3.9.0, 5.2.0, and 6.3.0. If user-supplied input was passed into append/override_content_security_policy_directives, a newline could be injected leading to limited header injection. Upon seei...
CVE-2020-5217
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
In Secure Headers (RubyGem secure_headers), a directive injection vulnerability is present in versions before 3.8.0, 5.1.0, and 6.2.0. If user-supplied input was passed into append/override_content_security_policy_directives, a semicolon could be injected leading to directive injection. This could b...
CVE-2020-5223
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
In PrivateBin versions 1.2.0 before 1.2.2, and 1.3.0 before 1.3.2, a persistent XSS attack is possible. Under certain conditions, a user provided attachment file name can inject HTML leading to a persistent Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The vulnerability has been fixed in PrivateBin v1.3...
CVE-2019-20399
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
A timing vulnerability in the Scalar::check_overflow function in Parity libsecp256k1-rs before 0.3.1 potentially allows an attacker to leak information via a side-channel attack.
CVE-2020-7915
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An issue was discovered on Eaton 5P 850 devices. The Ubicacion SAI field allows XSS attacks by an administrator.