Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

09:00 AM
Connect Directly

As Businesses Go Remote, Hackers Find New Security Gaps

Improper access control, information disclosure, and SSRF are among the most impactful, and most awarded, security flaws found this year.

Organizations are rethinking vulnerability disclosure programs to match a mostly remote staff and increasingly cloud-based infrastructure. As hackers take aim at new targets, they're finding more improper access control, information disclosure, and server-side request forgery flaws.

Related Content:

Vulnerability Disclosure Programs See Signups & Payouts Surge

2020 State of Cybersecurity Operations and Incident Response

The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence

Awards to white-hat hackers for improper access control jumped 134% year over year to reach just over $4 million, HackerOne reports in its new list of most impactful and most-awarded vulnerabilities of 2020. Information disclosure rewards increased 63% to reach $3.52 million. Companies spent nearly $3 million mitigating server-side request forgery (SSRF) this year — a 103% change from the year prior, researchers report.

"We've had quite a few of our programs that have expanded scope to include their remote access infrastructure and freshly migrated cloud applications," says HackerOne co-founder and CTO Alex Rice in an interview with Dark Reading. 

Most organizations with vulnerability disclosure programs focus on their core applications, not the tools their employees use to access them, Rice explains. Remote access infrastructure is historically out of scope for most. "Post-COVID, there's a lot more scrutiny on that," he notes.

Businesses have been forced to quickly move core applications, which previously required employees to use a VPN or be on-premises for access, to cloud environments or remotely accessible environments. Many have authorized hackers to hunt for bugs in things like their VPN infrastructure or zero-trust environments, and researchers are finding their ways around.

The organizations soon learned their enterprise applications that hadn't been "Internet battle-hardened" over the years now provide attackers with multiple routes in, Rice continues.

"If you've opened up more remote access infrastructure, or you made applications remotely accessible that weren't previously remotely accessible, and you haven't done deep security diligence into it, there's probably things you're missing," he adds. 

Improper access and information disclosure vulnerabilities can potentially expose sensitive data such as personally identifiable information. While they range in severity, these types of flaws could cause serious damage, and they're common because they're hard to find with automated tools.

The increase in SSRF vulnerabilities is a trend HackerOne noticed last year but has increased, Rice says. It's a trend somewhat related to the pandemic but more broadly driven by the broad migration to cloud environments.

"These vulnerabilities aren't very exploitable in on-prem or local environments but have massive impacts when redeployed to shared multitenant cloud environments. … We're seeing the impact of them spike pretty dramatically," he says.

As researchers explain in a blog post, SSRF bugs were previously "fairly benign" because they only enabled internal network scanning and sometimes access to internal admin panels. Now, the growth of cloud architecture and unprotected endpoints has made them more critical. 

"Theoretically, those vulnerabilities also always existed, they just weren't remotely accessible … so that is brand-new attack surface that's been exposed to our community and also largely attributed to COVID-19," Rice explains. Many applications that have been moved to the cloud previously would have not been moved to the cloud this quickly, or ever, he points out.

SQL injection, historically one of the most common vulnerability types, has been decreasing year over year, HackerOne reports. Rice attributes the change to modern security methods and frameworks. SQL injection tends to happen when businesses don't monitor which apps are mapped to a database and how they interface. Now, more teams are proactive about this and many public cloud environments are protected by default.

"We're seeing new applications that are being developed … are being developed with this top of mind, both from the people building the applications but also the cloud providers providing modern database frameworks that make it much harder to use these kinds of vulnerabilities," says Rice.

The pandemic has, unfortunately, increased the amount of time it takes organizations to address these bugs once they're discovered. The time to remediate vulnerabilities is 15% to 18% slower than it was in March, Rice points out, noting that security teams are struggling with fewer resources and work-from-home environments. 

These, combined with an increase in vulnerabilities, is slowing down remediation times — a big concern for severe bugs. The median remediation time for critical vulnerabilities had trended down to about 16.5 days in March; now, it's trending back up to 19.6 days, or an 18% increase.

Even companies normally quick to remediate are feeling the effects. The top 25% of HackerOne programs slowed from 4.5 days to remediation in March to 5.2 days in October. The drop, while small, is still meaningful because at that level of performance, point increases are hard to come by. "Those days add up when it's a race," Rice says.

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Cyberattacks Are Tailored to Employees ... Why Isn't Security Training?
Tim Sadler, CEO and co-founder of Tessian,  6/17/2021
7 Powerful Cybersecurity Skills the Energy Sector Needs Most
Pam Baker, Contributing Writer,  6/22/2021
Microsoft Disrupts Large-Scale BEC Campaign Across Web Services
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/15/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
A cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Catfish CMS 4.9.90 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload entered into the "announcement_gonggao" parameter.
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in GetSimpleCMS <= 3.3.15 in admin/changedata.php via the redirect_url parameter and the headers_sent function.
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
Cross Site Scriptiong (XSS) vulnerability in GetSimpleCMS <=3.3.15 via the timezone parameter to settings.php.
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in GetSimpleCMS <=3.3.15 via the (1) sitename, (2) username, and (3) email parameters to /admin/setup.php
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
Report portal is an open source reporting and analysis framework. Starting from version 3.1.0 of the service-api XML parsing was introduced. Unfortunately the XML parser was not configured properly to prevent XML external entity (XXE) attacks. This allows a user to import a specifically-crafted XML ...