Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

12/12/2019
05:15 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Android App Analysis Uncovers Seasonal Shopping Risk

Researchers scanned 4,200 Android apps and found many exhibit malicious behavior or have a dangerous level of permissions.

Be careful what you download: A recent analysis of 4,200 Android applications reveals how attackers leverage mobile apps to defraud users, especially during the holiday shopping season.

Barracuda Networks researchers analyzed more than 4,200 holiday-related Android apps, such as shopping apps, themed games, and Santa video chats. Seven exhibited malicious behavior, such as replacing the app with a version downloaded from the Internet via a C2 server. Thirty-five contained adware, while 165 had "excessive or dangerous combination of permissions."

Senior security researcher Jonathan Tanner says he was surprised by the nature of some holiday apps. When searching for Black Friday and Cyber Monday apps, researchers saw many described as "aggregate shopping apps" where users can browse a variety of retail websites.

"I would presume that for some of these sites … the app would require you to enter your account credentials for the specific site, so users would be offering all of their various shopping credentials to a single app that undoubtedly has far less security around protecting this data than the actual shopping sites," says Tanner of the potential risk. Even if the apps are safe from a malware perspective, there is a risk of credentials leaking from a number of sites in one app.

Many of the apps laced with adware seemed to be related to DIY gift projects, which Tanner notes is surprising given the range of apps downloaded. On the surface, many – like those advertising coupons and deals – seem more likely to leverage suspicious ad networks.

Tanner warned of apps requesting more permissions than they need, a risk that merits close attention from users. At least half of the apps that required dangerous permissions asked for access to the phone, camera, microphone, location, and text messages. The only apps that should access the phone or texts are apps that specifically work with these features, such as robocalling, he notes. The camera and microphone have more legitimate use cases, but based on the types of apps researchers scanned, very few should have needed either, he points out.

"There isn't a direct line between benign permissions and dangerous ones as they are dependent on what the app is supposed to do compared to how much risk they introduce," Tanner says. A shopping app designed to scan barcodes will need access to the camera, for example, so granting permission is appropriate but not guaranteed to be safe. A quarter of apps analyzed could read contacts, which is suspicious if it doesn't support collaboration or sharing.

"The mobile-first market is growing rapidly, and the majority of users still haven't made the connection that they're carrying a computer in their pocket – one which has the same risks as any computer," Tanner says. Raising awareness that the same precautions are necessary is key.

"The main behavior attackers take advantage of during the holidays is users letting their guards down," he says. Users looking for holiday sales in their email may not think twice when a deal seems too good to be true or let their guard down when scrutinizing mobile apps they install. In stores, many don't consider point-of-sale devices they share their credit cards with.

Mobile phone owners should be careful to check the reputation of every app they download, researchers advise: Look for user reviews, be aware of permissions granted, and consider whether they're necessary. A shopping or gifting app shouldn't require the ability to write text messages, for example.

Users should also enable parental controls to prevent app installs by children, be careful to check the senders of suspicious messages before clicking them, and shop directly from retail websites rather than using aggregate shopping apps.

Related Content:

Check out The Edge, Dark Reading's new section for features, threat data, and in-depth perspectives. Today's top story: "The Next Security Silicon Valley: Coming to a City Near You?"

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Stop Defending Everything
Kevin Kurzawa, Senior Information Security Auditor,  2/12/2020
Small Business Security: 5 Tips on How and Where to Start
Mike Puglia, Chief Strategy Officer at Kaseya,  2/13/2020
5 Common Errors That Allow Attackers to Go Undetected
Matt Middleton-Leal, General Manager and Chief Security Strategist, Netwrix,  2/12/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-20477
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-19
PyYAML 5.1 through 5.1.2 has insufficient restrictions on the load and load_all functions because of a class deserialization issue, e.g., Popen is a class in the subprocess module. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-18342.
CVE-2019-20478
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-19
In ruamel.yaml through 0.16.7, the load method allows remote code execution if the application calls this method with an untrusted argument. In other words, this issue affects developers who are unaware of the need to use methods such as safe_load in these use cases.
CVE-2011-2054
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-19
A vulnerability in the Cisco ASA that could allow a remote attacker to successfully authenticate using the Cisco AnyConnect VPN client if the Secondary Authentication type is LDAP and the password is left blank, providing the primary credentials are correct. The vulnerabilities is due to improper in...
CVE-2015-0749
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-19
A vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack on the affected software. The vulnerabilities is due to improper input validation of certain parameters passed to the affected software. An attacker ...
CVE-2015-9543
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-19
An issue was discovered in OpenStack Nova before 18.2.4, 19.x before 19.1.0, and 20.x before 20.1.0. It can leak consoleauth tokens into log files. An attacker with read access to the service's logs may obtain tokens used for console access. All Nova setups using novncproxy are affected. This is rel...