Threat Intelligence

12/6/2018
04:15 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Adobe Flash Zero-Day Spreads via Office Docs

Adobe has patched a zero-day in its Flash player after attackers leveraged the exploit in an active campaign.

An Adobe Flash zero-day was seen in the wild as part of an active campaign using the exploit in Microsoft Office documents. Adobe has since patched the vulnerability, CVE-2018-15982.

Gigamon's Applied Threat Research (ATR) team identified the active campaign, which uses malicious files to deliver the exploit. CVE-2018-15982 lets a Flash object execute code on a target machine and enables an attacker to gain command line access to the victim's system.

The document used in this campaign, "22.docx," was submitted by a Ukrainian IP address to VirusTotal. It appears to be an application for a Russian state healthcare clinic; the logo indicates it's a fake application for "Polyclinic No. 2," an adult outpatient clinic located in Moscow. Analysts compared the logo in the doc to the clinic's authentic logo.

The file contains seven pages of personal questions typical of an employment application, requesting the recipient's full name, birthdate, profession, company division, and level of skill.

"It's indicative of a targeted spear-phishing attack, presumably things the receiver would be familiar with," says Josh Carlson, vice president of threat research at Gigamon. The way the document is crafted suggests its recipients would recognize the clinic's name and logo. While this type of phishing lure appears to be highly targeted, ATR researchers point out the team has observed other similar spear-phishing attacks in which lures are unrelated to their recipients.

It's hard to tell for sure because ATR doesn't have specifics on the extent of this campaign or number of people affected. Carlson suggests this is either a highly targeted attack, in which the actor(s) has substantial knowledge of the victim's environment, or the actor is testing his tools.

A Closer Look at the Attack
The way this attack unfolds is simple: The document's header contains an Active X control, which renders when the file is opened and causes an exploitation of Flash within Office. The exploitation leads to the execution of a malicious command, which attempts to extract and execute a payload, researchers explain in a blog post on their discovery.

In this case, the Flash exploit is self-encapsulated within the document and supports 32- and 64-bit systems. The Flash file and shellcode stubs don't make use of remote inclusion, staging, obfuscation, or any kind of anti-analysis, researchers say. Both shellcode stubs execute the same command, which is consistent with an attack packaged as a RAR archive. Testing shows that opening the document within the archive is enough to run the exploit and payload.

(Image: Kaspars Grinvalds - stock.adobe.com)

(Image: Kaspars Grinvalds stock.adobe.com)

There isn't much that's unique about this campaign, Carlson says, but what's strange is it requires targets to take several steps to open the document and execute the command.

"It's unusual in that they have a zero-day in Flash, but they're requesting users to go through extra clicks and follow steps to leverage it," he explains.

Analysts have moderate to high confidence the payload is a variant of Scout malware, based on similarity in submission details, behavior, close time proximity, and file name matching the one expected by the exploit. The payload, a Windows executable file, is protected with VMProtect, which prevents reverse engineering and analysis. The payload collects system data, establishes persistence, and communicates with a remote server via HTTP post.

The techniques of this campaign are similar to those used by HackingTeam, an Italian offensive security company selling remote access-as-a-service and surveillance tools. When HackingTeam was breached in 2015, its internal data, including email and source code for backdoors and exploits, was publicly spread. Cyberattackers around the world began using HackingTeam's tools to launch operations. This could be the case here, but attribution is difficult, ATR says.

"There are similarities to HackingTeam, but in reality those tools have been reused by many copycats," Carlson says.

Flash Stays Alive… For Now
The death of Flash is a common topic in cybersecurity as efforts aim to remove Flash from Web browsers. Cybercriminals, however, will continue to use it. They're just finding new ways. Vectors like Microsoft Office can still load and execute Flash content, and exploits against zero-days that allow for command execution using popular enterprise software will prove valuable.

"As Flash is less used in browsers, the attackers are moving toward Office as an attack vector," Carlson explains. Flash is going to become less of an attack surface over time, but it still works, he says.

Related Content:

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
'PowerSnitch' Hacks Androids via Power Banks
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/8/2018
The Case for a Human Security Officer
Ira Winkler, CISSP, President, Secure Mentem,  12/5/2018
Windows 10 Security Questions Prove Easy for Attackers to Exploit
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  12/5/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
10 Best Practices That Could Reshape Your IT Security Department
This Dark Reading Tech Digest, explores ten best practices that could reshape IT security departments.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-8651
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-12
A cross site scripting vulnerability exists when Microsoft Dynamics NAV does not properly sanitize a specially crafted web request to an affected Dynamics NAV server, aka "Microsoft Dynamics NAV Cross Site Scripting Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Dynamics NAV.
CVE-2018-8652
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-12
A Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists when Windows Azure Pack does not properly sanitize user-provided input, aka "Windows Azure Pack Cross Site Scripting Vulnerability." This affects Windows Azure Pack Rollup 13.1.
CVE-2018-8617
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-12
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8583, CVE-2018-8...
CVE-2018-8618
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-12
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8583, CVE-2018-8...
CVE-2018-8619
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-12
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Internet Explorer VBScript execution policy does not properly restrict VBScript under specific conditions, aka "Internet Explorer Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This affects Internet Explorer 9, Internet Explorer 11, Internet Exp...