Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

2/26/2018
04:30 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Adobe Flash Vulnerability Reappears in Malicious Word Files

CVE-2018-4878, a Flash zero-day patched earlier this month, has resurfaced in another campaign as attackers capitalize on the bug.

An Adobe Flash vulnerability CVE-2018-4878 patched earlier this month is being exploited in a new phishing campaign leveraging malicious Microsoft Word documents.

This critical vulnerability is a use-after-free bug that enables remote code execution, according to Adobe. It was first spotted in targeted attacks against primarily South Korean victims. In early February, the South Korea Computer Emergency Response Team (KrCERT/CC) issued an advisory on CVE-2018-4878 in Flash Payer ActiveX 28.0.0.137 and earlier versions.

Successful exploitation of the vulnerability could let an attacker assume control over an affected system. The first wave of attacks, delivered via malicious Excel documents, were attributed to the North Korean-based APT group ScarCruft. Some researchers say that group likely purchased the exploit given their overall lack of sophistication and access to cryptocurrency.

Adobe addressed CVE-2018-4878 in Flash version 28.0.0.161, released on February 6. Shortly after, Morphisec researchers spotted the vulnerability being exploited in the latest attack campaign.

After analyzing the first targeted attack, the team set up Yara rules to identify any usage of de-obfuscated attack files, explains Michael Gorelik, Morphisec CTO and vice president of R&D. On February 22, they noticed matching files appear in the wild and started an investigation.

They discovered the new campaign is very similar to the first one, save for a few changes the attackers made to evade static defenses. All malicious documents showed a low detection ratio on VirusTotal, and all next-stage artifacts were downloaded from a newly registered domain.

This campaign, which targeted about 1,000 people, was larger than the first but still aimed for specific victims. Its targets are scattered; victims' email addresses range from website owners to post offices. Most can be used as attack distributors to larger populations, says Gorelik. Unlike the earlier campaign, these targets were distributed between Europe and the US.

"The attackers did care less about staying undetected and had a very short campaign which was carefully designed, since they did know that other solutions will update their signatures within one to three days," he says.

Attackers slightly altered the malicious files by changing the encryption algorithm, though the shellcode was visible, he continues. They also used Word documents to deliver the exploit, which helped them succeed since the last campaign used compromised Excel files.

Emails used in the campaign included short links to a malicious website. Because the links were created with Google URL Shortener, analysts could view the click rate and mail host used. They learned victims opened these links through Outlook, Gmail, and Aruba.it, an Italian web host.

Gorelik doesn't think the attackers behind the first campaign are responsible for this one. Characteristics of the attack indicate this was done by cybercriminals and not a nation-state.

"This is the work of cybercriminal groups," he explains. "This is obvious based on the targets scattering, target count, the use of known obfuscation and evasion techniques without additional innovative approach." Further, the fact that the attack was executed only two days after domain registration is a sign of criminal activity. Domains for targeted attacks are usually compromised further in advance.

"It looks like very different actors are behind it, and they are using the de-obfuscated variants of published PoCs, and de-obfuscated samples which do not support 64-bit code execution," he explains. He expects other attackers will continue to take advantage of this exploit.

"We anticipated that this Flash exploit will be used in malspam campaigns very soon," he says, adding that he predicts the same exploit will be used in drive-by attacks in the near future. "The vulnerability is very stable and easy to exploit and bypasses all existing security mechanisms."

Related Content:

 

 

 

Black Hat Asia returns to Singapore with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier solutions and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
markgrogan
50%
50%
markgrogan,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/16/2018 | 11:22:01 PM
Competition is key
People take for granted the existing standards that we have simply because there are few other competitors for such file formats. Honestly speaking, there need to be more players in the market, simply so that people will have alternatives. And after all, competition in the market will propel innovation and not to mention give better price rates to customers everywhere. That's got to be good for everyone somehow!
Sodinokibi Ransomware: Where Attackers' Money Goes
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  10/15/2019
Data Privacy Protections for the Most Vulnerable -- Children
Dimitri Sirota, Founder & CEO of BigID,  10/17/2019
7 SMB Security Tips That Will Keep Your Company Safe
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  10/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: The old using of sock puppets for Shoulder Surfing technique. 
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
2019 Online Malware and Threats
2019 Online Malware and Threats
As cyberattacks become more frequent and more sophisticated, enterprise security teams are under unprecedented pressure to respond. Is your organization ready?
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-17513
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-18
An issue was discovered in Ratpack before 1.7.5. Due to a misuse of the Netty library class DefaultHttpHeaders, there is no validation that headers lack HTTP control characters. Thus, if untrusted data is used to construct HTTP headers with Ratpack, HTTP Response Splitting can occur.
CVE-2019-8216
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-17
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions , 2019.012.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30148 and earlier, 2017.011.30148 and earlier, 2015.006.30503 and earlier, and 2015.006.30503 and earlier have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure .
CVE-2019-8217
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-17
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions , 2019.012.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30148 and earlier, 2017.011.30148 and earlier, 2015.006.30503 and earlier, and 2015.006.30503 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-8218
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-17
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions , 2019.012.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30148 and earlier, 2017.011.30148 and earlier, 2015.006.30503 and earlier, and 2015.006.30503 and earlier have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure .
CVE-2019-8219
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-17
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions , 2019.012.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30148 and earlier, 2017.011.30148 and earlier, 2015.006.30503 and earlier, and 2015.006.30503 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .