Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

10/2/2020
10:15 AM
Jai Vijayan
Jai Vijayan
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

3 Months for the Cybercrime Books

From July through September, US law enforcement handed down major indictments or sanctions against foreign threat groups at least six times.
Previous
1 of 7
Next

Related Content:

The No Good, Very Bad Week for Iran's Nation-State Hacking Ops

The Threat from the Internet—and What Your Organization Can Do About It

New on The Edge: What Legal Language Should I Look Out for When Selecting Cyber Insurance?

In a somewhat unusual flurry of activity this summer, the US government indicted or sanctioned multiple cyber threat actors and groups thought to be working on behalf of foreign governments.

In announcing charges, US officials rarely minced words, describing the countries in which the individuals and groups were operating from as sponsors of cyber-enabled crime and espionage. A majority of the legal actions involved threat groups and actors working out of — and allegedly on behalf of — Iran and China, two countries at loggerheads with the US on various geopolitical issues. Two other countries that the US has openly accused of sponsoring cybercrime and espionage are Russia and North Korea.

In the past, such indictments and sanctions have done little to slow down the activity of cybercriminals operating with impunity in countries with no extradition agreements with the US or hostile to US interests. Even so, by naming and charging individual operatives and groups within these countries, US law enforcement is demonstrating its ability to attribute attacks, says Austin Berglas, global head of professional services at BlueVoyant.

"The US Department of Justice, law enforcement, and intelligence community are no doubt under a lot of pressure to 'do something' about the constant barrage of cyberattacks from our foreign adversaries," says Berglas, former head of cyber for the FBI in NYC.

The practice of obtaining "name and shame" indictments, where individuals are charged even though there's only a very slim chance of them ever being brought to justice, is nothing new, he says.

"The intent behind these efforts is for the US to showcase their very powerful capability to identify the actual human being behind the keyboard, and not just attributing an attack to a certain nation-state," Berglas says.

But in order for these charges and announcements to serve as significant deterrents, it is imperative the US supports these indictments with whatever political or economic sanctions or penalties are deemed appropriate, he adds.

The following are six indictments or sanctions the US government announced this summer against foreign-based cyberattackers and groups.

 

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Previous
1 of 7
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 10/23/2020
Modern Day Insider Threat: Network Bugs That Are Stealing Your Data
David Pearson, Principal Threat Researcher,  10/21/2020
Are You One COVID-19 Test Away From a Cybersecurity Disaster?
Alan Brill, Senior Managing Director, Cyber Risk Practice, Kroll,  10/21/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-21269
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-27
checkpath in OpenRC through 0.42.1 might allow local users to take ownership of arbitrary files because a non-terminal path component can be a symlink.
CVE-2020-27743
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
libtac in pam_tacplus through 1.5.1 lacks a check for a failure of RAND_bytes()/RAND_pseudo_bytes(). This could lead to use of a non-random/predictable session_id.
CVE-2020-1915
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
An out-of-bounds read in the JavaScript Interpreter in Facebook Hermes prior to commit 8cb935cd3b2321c46aa6b7ed8454d95c75a7fca0 allows attackers to cause a denial of service attack or possible further memory corruption via crafted JavaScript. Note that this is only exploitable if the application usi...
CVE-2020-26878
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
Ruckus through 1.5.1.0.21 is affected by remote command injection. An authenticated user can submit a query to the API (/service/v1/createUser endpoint), injecting arbitrary commands that will be executed as root user via web.py.
CVE-2020-26879
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
Ruckus vRioT through 1.5.1.0.21 has an API backdoor that is hardcoded into validate_token.py. An unauthenticated attacker can interact with the service API by using a backdoor value as the Authorization header.