Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

4/23/2019
07:00 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

1 in 4 Workers Are Aware Of Security Guidelines but Ignore Them

Even more are knowingly connecting to unsecure networks and sharing confidential information through collaboration platforms, according to Symphony Communication Services.

An alarming percentage of workers are consciously avoiding IT guidelines for security, according to a new report from Symphony Communication Services.

The report, released this morning, is based on a survey of 1,569 respondents from the US and UK who use collaboration tools at work. It found that 24% of those surveyed are aware of IT security guidelines yet are not following them. Another 27% knowingly connect to an unsecure network. And 25% share confidential information through collaboration platforms, including Skype, Slack, and Microsoft Teams.  

While the numbers may at first appear alarming, there's another way to look at them, says Frank Dickson, a research vice president at IDC who covers security.

"What I see is a large percentage of workers who view security as an impediment," Dickson says. "When security gets in the way of workers getting their jobs done, people will go around security. Companies need to provide better tools so people can be more effective."

Jonathan Christensen, Symphony's chief experience officer, says that's what Symphony was hoping to find out in doing the survey.

"The classic trade-off is that the more the security, the more clunky and cumbersome the product becomes," Christensen says. "We believe that companies don't have to make that trade-off."

When security pros look for collaboration tools, they should ask vendors whether they offer end-to-end encryption and can administer the keys locally, he says.

"Remember that in a collaboration tool, all the information transmitted is business-critical," Christensen says. "It can be everything from financial data, HR information, and customer account information, so you want to protect it end-to-end."

Survey respondents were also overly optimistic about the security capabilities of collaboration products, Christensen says. For example, 93% say they have confidence their communications and data shared over messaging and collaboration tools are adequately secured by their companies and are safe from hackers. In addition, 84% say they are at least somewhat confident their collaboration providers do not have access to their messages.  

Symphony also found a generational shift in security attitudes between Baby Boomers and Millennials.

For example, the survey found that Millennials are:

  • 2x more likely to share confidential information over messaging/collaboration apps.
  • 3x more likely to download sensitive info or intellectual property from their companies.
  • 2x more likely to talk badly about the boss over chat.
  • 3x more likely to share company credit card or password information.
  • 2x more likely to gossip about co-workers.
  • 2x more likely to download a communications app not approved by IT.

Meanwhile, Baby Boomers are:

  • 2x as likely to have never engaged in any of 10 risky security behaviors.
  • 2x as likely to never discuss non-work matters over collaboration tools.
  • 2x more skeptical than Millennials that vendors couldn't view their chats.

"Millennials grew up with social media and apps like Snapchat and are used to widely sharing information," Christensen says. "They take those attitudes into the workplace."

IDC's Dickson agrees that the contrast between generations offers some of the more interesting data from the report.

"The generations have had different experiences with computers,"Dickson says. "Most Baby Boomers have had the experience of a computer crashing and losing data, as well as being phished or hit with a virus. The Millennials are used to sharing. Computers and networks also work better and are more stable today, so not as many of them know what it's liked to experience a computer crash."

Related Content:

 

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop agenda here.

Steve Zurier has more than 30 years of journalism and publishing experience, most of the last 24 of which were spent covering networking and security technology. Steve is based in Columbia, Md. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
JayG460
50%
50%
JayG460,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/23/2019 | 11:06:57 AM
Microsoft Teams?
I find it interesting to mention a product that would have necesssarily been licensed by the company initially.  Teams isn't available as a stand-alone offering like the other two software's mentioned.  As such the company should be in full control of the restrictions around the offering.
97% of Americans Can't Ace a Basic Security Test
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  5/20/2019
How Security Vendors Can Address the Cybersecurity Talent Shortage
Rob Rashotte, VP of Global Training and Technical Field Enablement at Fortinet,  5/24/2019
TeamViewer Admits Breach from 2016
Dark Reading Staff 5/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-7068
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7069
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7070
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7071
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure.
CVE-2019-7072
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .