Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

11/27/2006
06:40 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Startup to Take Measure of Security

Errata will security-test and certify software and managed security services

David Maynor, a security researcher who used to work with SecureWorks, and Robert Graham, former chief scientist for ISS, have quietly launched a new security firm that tests and certifies the security of software, Dark Reading has learned.

The new Atlanta-based company, called Errata Security, plans to test all types of software products as well as managed security service offerings, both for the vendors and potential buyers of the products and services.

"We test for how much due diligence a vendor has put into security," says Maynor, CTO of the new startup. Graham is also president and CEO. "The earlier this kind of testing becomes involved in product development or the development of a service offering, the easier it is to fix the [security] mistakes as they happen, instead of after the fact."

Errata uses homegrown tools to provide security assessment scores and other information on just how secure a product is. "We alert our customers that if a hacker were auditing them for bugs, these are the things that stick out for them, the real problems," he says.

Errata isn't the first organization to offer security certification. ICSA Labs and The NSS Group have been security-testing and certifying products for some time, mainly using publicly available tools. (See EMC Gets Certification.) Most vendors use these services as stamps of approval for additional credibility in their security marketing.

But Errata says it will raise the bar with more stringent tests, using its own testing suites and custom-built exploits, for instance.

"We are also grading the products based on real-world scenarios," Maynor says. "When looking over some reports, the fact that a product stops 21 out of 25 randomly selected exploits might not mean much to a customer. [But] seeing that this product performs well or poorly in a scenario the customer can relate to -- like detecting machines infected with bots -- helps people understand better."

Thomas Ptacek, a researcher with Matasano Security, which helps vendors secure their products but doesn't provide certification, says he's skeptical of any certification processes. "The major labs claim they already do the kind of extensive testing that Errata will be doing. But they don't have anyone like Dave Maynor on staff," Ptacek says. "So the certifications we have today [with the major labs] are just very expensive stickers, available to anyone who ponies up the cash."

Trouble is, educated buyers ignore certifications, he says, and it's tough to explain to a mainstream buyer why existing certifications don't carry much weight. "Errata's trying to be an honest player in a crooked card game. That's a problem."

Maynor says he and Graham launched Errata because they felt there was a need for a trusted source of testing. "A lot of people are feeling that there really isn't a gold standard of testing."

Vendors that want to differentiate themselves may undergo such testing, but they are also understandably shy about any negative feedback published about their products, notes Mike Scher, general counsel and compliance architect for Nexum, an IT security VAR and MSSP, and former head of Neohapsis Labs.

Errata, meanwhile, analyzes binary code, not source code: "A lot of consulting companies [do] source-code analysis, but that doesn't really tell a nontechnical person how secure a product is," Maynor says.

Errata is offering different levels of testing -- fully automated, complete with a scoring system; a combination of automated testing and manual analysis; and a full security audit, which includes the first two levels of testing as well.

And in January, Errata will test and certify managed security service providers' services. "This is a departure from current security testing methods, where you will just run a list of known exploits past devices and give a score based on the number caught and missed," he says. "Our tests are more focused on real-world scenarios that are important to customers -- like can this MSSP service help me detect and shutdown an internal machine that has been infected with a rootkit and is spewing spam."

Errata hopes to provide a report card of how well MSSPs can protect their customers, including metrics to compare them with other MSSPs. "An example of the metrics we are looking for is the average response to critical activities like a host being compromised or detection of a denial-of-service attack," Maynor says. "This test will evaluate a MSSP total service, just not a particular product they are managing."

The company is so new that its Website is still under development but will be available soon, according to Errata officials.

— Kelly Jackson Higgins, Senior Editor, Dark Reading

  • IBM Internet Security Systems
  • SecureWorks Inc. Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    Sodinokibi Ransomware: Where Attackers' Money Goes
    Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  10/15/2019
    How to Think Like a Hacker
    Dr. Giovanni Vigna, Chief Technology Officer at Lastline,  10/10/2019
    7 SMB Security Tips That Will Keep Your Company Safe
    Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  10/11/2019
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon Contest
    Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
    Latest Comment: The old using of sock puppets for Shoulder Surfing technique. 
    Current Issue
    7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
    This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
    Flash Poll
    2019 Online Malware and Threats
    2019 Online Malware and Threats
    As cyberattacks become more frequent and more sophisticated, enterprise security teams are under unprecedented pressure to respond. Is your organization ready?
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2019-17672
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-17
    WordPress before 5.2.4 is vulnerable to a stored XSS attack to inject JavaScript into STYLE elements.
    CVE-2019-17673
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-17
    WordPress before 5.2.4 is vulnerable to poisoning of the cache of JSON GET requests because certain requests lack a Vary: Origin header.
    CVE-2019-17674
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-17
    WordPress before 5.2.4 is vulnerable to stored XSS (cross-site scripting) via the Customizer.
    CVE-2019-17675
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-17
    WordPress before 5.2.4 does not properly consider type confusion during validation of the referer in the admin pages, possibly leading to CSRF.
    CVE-2019-17676
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-17
    app/system/admin/admin/index.class.php in MetInfo 7.0.0beta allows a CSRF attack to add a user account via a doSaveSetup action to admin/index.php, as demonstrated by an admin/?n=admin&c=index&a=doSaveSetup URI.