Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

1/10/2008
06:00 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Spammers Abuse Online Storage, File-Sharing Services

Microsoft's Windows Live SkyDrive Beta and other freebie services ripe for spammers

Spammers love free hosting, so it's no surprise that they continue to hammer free online storage and file-sharing services -- these sites are attractive to spammers because they have legitimate URLs and are typically immune to blacklisting.

Microsoft's Windows Live SkyDrive Beta was the latest such service to be victimized by spammers. Earlier this week, McAfee Avert Labs captured thousands of spam messages that contained links to SkyDrive. The links redirected you to an online pharmacy service. McAfee estimates that the spammers uploaded tens of thousands of files to the site.

Spammers are always looking for cheap and easy ways to distribute their unwanted traffic. "Any free Web host will be vulnerable to this in theory," says Richi Jennings, an independent consultant who specializes in spam and email technology. "Blogspot, for example. And spammers have used Geocities for years. I've seen them use Google's Picasa free hosting, too."

Jennings says spammers use these sites as a redirector to their own Websites. "They're just using it as a redirector to wherever their 'spamvertised' Website is at the moment," Jennings says. "Because that might change if their host kicks them off."

Botnets are a popular means of spewing spam, he says, but even with fast-flux Domain Name Services (DNS), bot availability isn't always a given since client machines are often turned on and off. (See On the Trail of 'Fast Flux' Botnets and Attackers Hide in Fast Flux.) "So spammers keep coming back to this idea of [abusing] free Web hosting," he says. "There is little oversight by 'real' humans, so the time taken to remove abusive pages is long," and they send their spam runs out efficiently, he says.

SkyDrive, for instance, is susceptible because it doesn't do a malware scan, and it's also still in beta, so it's still a bit of a work in progress, according to McAfee researchers. Fee-based services such as Amazon's S3 and Nirvanix are less attractive to spammers because they aren't free. But freebies like SkyDrive, Rapidshare.com, and Filefactory.com have been abused by spammers, says Dave Marcus, security research and communications manager for McAfee's Avert Labs.

Marcus adds that online storage and file-sharing sites that encrypt files make it tough for filters to scan them for spam.

The good news is that the SkyDrive spam run stopped early Tuesday morning, either because it had drawn unwanted attention, or because Microsoft had shut it down, Marcus says. Microsoft had not responded to press inquires at the time of this posting.

The spam payload was a "welcome" HTML file with a redirector that takes the victim to an online pharmacy. McAfee researchers have also seen this redirect technique being used on Blogspot spam blogs (sblogs).

Online storage and file-sharing services should scan any uploads and apply strong spam content filtering to "what's being pushed out," Marcus says.

The latest spam run wasn't the first for SkyDrive. McAfee researchers had previously detected some small-scale spam runs last fall. "Another interesting point is the number of times we trapped each url was interestingly low for such a big campaign, I’d therefore estimate they had tens of thousands of files uploaded," a McAfee researcher wrote in the Avert Labs blog. "I’m sure it won’t be too long before it’s used to host other unwelcome content types I’d like to see more of these online file storage offerings malware scanning downloads too." [sic]

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

  • Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT)
  • McAfee Inc. (NYSE: MFE)
  • Nirvanix Inc.

    Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio
     

    Recommended Reading:

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
    Dark Reading Staff 5/28/2020
    Stay-at-Home Orders Coincide With Massive DNS Surge
    Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/27/2020
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon Contest
    Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
    Latest Comment: Can you smell me now?
    Current Issue
    How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
    This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
    Flash Poll
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2020-11844
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    There is an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Micro Focus Service Management Automation (SMA) product affecting version 2018.05 to 2020.02. The vulnerability could be exploited to provide unauthorized access to the Container Deployment Foundation.
    CVE-2020-6937
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    A Denial of Service vulnerability in MuleSoft Mule CE/EE 3.8.x, 3.9.x, and 4.x released before April 7, 2020, could allow remote attackers to submit data which can lead to resource exhaustion.
    CVE-2020-7648
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    All versions of snyk-broker before 4.72.2 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads for users who have access to Snyk's internal network by appending the URL with a fragment identifier and a whitelisted path e.g. `#package.json`
    CVE-2020-7650
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    All versions of snyk-broker after 4.72.0 including and before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads to users with access to Snyk's internal network of any files ending in the following extensions: yaml, yml or json.
    CVE-2020-7654
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    All versions of snyk-broker before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Information Exposure. It logs private keys if logging level is set to DEBUG.